There is an even more interesting question which you haven't considered.
And that is how they chose to resurrect Malthus in the 1970s when he had already been de-bunked?
One of those who did exactly that was the Russian scientist V Vernadsky who was well-known in the period before WWII. The Russians would have been well-aware of what Vernadsky thought about Malthus.
What you may not realise is that the original Malthus thesis of 1799 was based on an earlier work by Venetian Giammaria Ortes who wrote on the subject in 1790.
It speaks to the deliberate use of harmful psy-ops over centuries being re-deployed at intervals. It didn't all start in either 1972 or 1799.
[BTW - I write on my substack about the baleful influence of Venetians on Western thought, especially via British scientists of all kinds (political and physical) since at least the C17th. Most famous being Sir Isaac Newton]
ill take your word for it. when i began my journey, i thought all those who spoke of the freemasons and this having begun more than 100 years ago as, um, slightly without a paddle, but now i'm essentially 99% sure of the trajectory to around 1890s, and working to cement the path back to 1844.
one of the essays i work on atm relate to how monism is a tool of control, and how Paul Carus essentially spliced Spinoza's 'experiences' into the prevailing track leading to systems theory (adaptive management). that in essence takes us back to 1677.
bigdanov's empiriomonism then fully integrates spinoza, as he makes the type of monism arbitrary - essentially, integrating spinoza's 'mode'.
and while this particular essay relates to hegelian dialectics, the universal moral framework - later developed by hermann cohen - essentially is founded on kant's categorical imperative, with 'the greeks' having been fused into layers of governance, ethics, and equilibrium.
a while back i read a book, forget its title, but it relates to 'the books the elite read' - and it was chock full of socrates, plato, aristotle. didn't think much of it at the time, but years later it makes complete sense.
The Venetians were not keen on Kepler - because of his Pythagorean ideas about planets orbiting in harmony. So they backed Galileo in order to discredit him.
They also pulled Sir Francis Bacon into their thinking.
Bacon begins the belief in the bogus concept of the 'scientific method'.
After Kepler died, Leibniz picks up his baton on harmony.
Venetians defo wanted him out of the picture. They sent their man, the Abbe Antonio Conti, to London in 1715 to intervene and make sure that Sir Isaac Newton won the argument with Leibniz.
What appeals to me about the Venetian explanation is that it provides both a motive and a method.
The motive is explained by the fact that these are predators. They want access to resources (human and non-human) and at scale - hence the desire for empire and great trading companies.
The method is explained by the use of psy-ops (at scale) to subdue populations.
Science and pseudo-science (eg Malthus) is v useful at getting into people's heads.
The problem for us is that we haven't appreciated the scale at which these evil entities operate. Or the lengths to which they are prepared to go.
Brilliant job digging all this out from behind those carefully arranged facades. Lots of high-sounding rhetoric just to say, "We're taking over the world and shaping it to serve our needs and you will do as we say - if we decide to let you live." A pretty grim but amazingly evil 'shell game'. Thanks for laying out your discoveries. Now we must unwind it. Finding out their ideas about 'health' are false helps open the door to seeing all their other mistakes. Big help, thanks!
It’s just so breathtakingly deceitful. In Albert pikes morals and dogme is says wet level 33 that they will take charge through being intellectually superior, and that they are those who balance the inequilibrium. It’s just too coincidental given Pike wrote the book in 1871
thesis+truth, antithesis= lie, synthesis- twisting perception of reality. even and eventually to the point of delusion. they do it in religion, in schooling, in politics. in marketing, especially.
There’s no difference between th tories and labour - it’s just a matter of which SDGs to implement in which order
Both parties deserve to be completely bulldozed for their lies and betrayal of their voters and this mornings election results are showing people are waking up.
@esc
There is an even more interesting question which you haven't considered.
And that is how they chose to resurrect Malthus in the 1970s when he had already been de-bunked?
One of those who did exactly that was the Russian scientist V Vernadsky who was well-known in the period before WWII. The Russians would have been well-aware of what Vernadsky thought about Malthus.
What you may not realise is that the original Malthus thesis of 1799 was based on an earlier work by Venetian Giammaria Ortes who wrote on the subject in 1790.
It speaks to the deliberate use of harmful psy-ops over centuries being re-deployed at intervals. It didn't all start in either 1972 or 1799.
[BTW - I write on my substack about the baleful influence of Venetians on Western thought, especially via British scientists of all kinds (political and physical) since at least the C17th. Most famous being Sir Isaac Newton]
ill take your word for it. when i began my journey, i thought all those who spoke of the freemasons and this having begun more than 100 years ago as, um, slightly without a paddle, but now i'm essentially 99% sure of the trajectory to around 1890s, and working to cement the path back to 1844.
one of the essays i work on atm relate to how monism is a tool of control, and how Paul Carus essentially spliced Spinoza's 'experiences' into the prevailing track leading to systems theory (adaptive management). that in essence takes us back to 1677.
bigdanov's empiriomonism then fully integrates spinoza, as he makes the type of monism arbitrary - essentially, integrating spinoza's 'mode'.
and while this particular essay relates to hegelian dialectics, the universal moral framework - later developed by hermann cohen - essentially is founded on kant's categorical imperative, with 'the greeks' having been fused into layers of governance, ethics, and equilibrium.
a while back i read a book, forget its title, but it relates to 'the books the elite read' - and it was chock full of socrates, plato, aristotle. didn't think much of it at the time, but years later it makes complete sense.
I have tracked it to earlier than that.
The Venetians were not keen on Kepler - because of his Pythagorean ideas about planets orbiting in harmony. So they backed Galileo in order to discredit him.
They also pulled Sir Francis Bacon into their thinking.
Bacon begins the belief in the bogus concept of the 'scientific method'.
After Kepler died, Leibniz picks up his baton on harmony.
Venetians defo wanted him out of the picture. They sent their man, the Abbe Antonio Conti, to London in 1715 to intervene and make sure that Sir Isaac Newton won the argument with Leibniz.
I write about it all in this article https://lucywyatt.substack.com/p/science-and-the-quest-for-harmony
What appeals to me about the Venetian explanation is that it provides both a motive and a method.
The motive is explained by the fact that these are predators. They want access to resources (human and non-human) and at scale - hence the desire for empire and great trading companies.
The method is explained by the use of psy-ops (at scale) to subdue populations.
Science and pseudo-science (eg Malthus) is v useful at getting into people's heads.
The problem for us is that we haven't appreciated the scale at which these evil entities operate. Or the lengths to which they are prepared to go.
Brilliant job digging all this out from behind those carefully arranged facades. Lots of high-sounding rhetoric just to say, "We're taking over the world and shaping it to serve our needs and you will do as we say - if we decide to let you live." A pretty grim but amazingly evil 'shell game'. Thanks for laying out your discoveries. Now we must unwind it. Finding out their ideas about 'health' are false helps open the door to seeing all their other mistakes. Big help, thanks!
It’s just so breathtakingly deceitful. In Albert pikes morals and dogme is says wet level 33 that they will take charge through being intellectually superior, and that they are those who balance the inequilibrium. It’s just too coincidental given Pike wrote the book in 1871
thesis+truth, antithesis= lie, synthesis- twisting perception of reality. even and eventually to the point of delusion. they do it in religion, in schooling, in politics. in marketing, especially.
The Conservatives are complicit in this greenwashing.
https://unlimitedhangout.com/2024/11/investigative-reports/get-ready-for-the-republican-carbon-market/
There’s no difference between th tories and labour - it’s just a matter of which SDGs to implement in which order
Both parties deserve to be completely bulldozed for their lies and betrayal of their voters and this mornings election results are showing people are waking up.
genius! eureka!