In Nazi Germany in 1942, the Verein Berliner Kaufleute und Industrieller and the Wirtschafts-Hochschule Berlin published a 229-page book called Europäische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft — European Economic Community.
ICYMI, a re-post of a note from Escape Key that is particularly illuminating in this connection. Quoting verbatim:
"The system they construct is context-agnostic.
Replace the 'ethical' SDGs with racial purity, and you're in Nazi Germany. Replace with 'duty towards the collective' and you're in the Soviet Union. Replace it with 'Silly Hat Thursdays', and . . .
• The NGFS would produce silly hat scenarios.
• The Basel Committee would translate them into capital requirements for hat-deficient entities.
• ISO would publish a hat management system standard.
• FATF would grey-list jurisdictions with insufficient hat compliance.
• CBAM would levy charges on imports from countries with low hat-wearing rates.
• CBDC payment at the coffee shop would clear, conditional on hat verification.
And it would feel normal. Because the ethic would have been endorsed by the Vatican, the Crown, and the scientific consensus. The IPCC equivalent would have published hat-necessity projections. The SDG equivalent would include Universal Hat Access as Goal 18. The MSM would explain why hat resistance is rooted in privilege. The platforms would flag hat-scepticism as misinformation.
And anyone who said 'this is insane, it's just hats' would be told they were a hat-denier threatening public safety.
Should a system which can enforce something that obviously silly with identical efficiency even be allowed to exist?"
I spent hours reading your research and going sideways, leading from one rabbit hole to another. Fascinating how it all morphed into the monstrous machine it is today. Thx for sharing your expertise.
The German National Socialists appeared to articulate a structural counterpoint to the stranglehold of the City of London on European commerce and potentially at least, European unity based on economic co-operation. ESC you do indeed construct incredibly detailed and valuable analysis. I note that two key figures are referenced, French Foreign Minister Robert Schuman and French economist and diplomat Jean Monnet. A small detail, but one step in which one wonders how it fits exactly into the described operational framework outlined going forward? Quote: "It is not known whether either (Schuman and Monnet) were directly aware of the 1942 plan written by nine Nazi-era authors, a detailed economic plan later adopted in the Treaty of Rome in 1957." "The system the Nazi leaders laid out in detail mirrors what was later adopted in the Treaty of Rome in 1957." However, you omit 'The Schuman Declaration' of May 9, 1950, which seems a seminal step and leaves a temporal void. It proposed the creation of a European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), which was established by the Treaty of Paris in 1951. 'Building on the success of the ECSC, the six member states (France, West Germany, Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg) sought to expand their cooperation to other economic sectors. This led to the signing of the Treaty of Rome on March 25, 1957, which established the European Economic Community (EEC) and the European Atomic Energy Community (EURATOM)'. The History of the European Common Market June 27, 2024. https://historianmaniac.blogspot.com/2024/06/the-history-of-european-common-market.html
They’ve been planning for centuries. My hunch is that the French ‘revolution’ was their first big win and since then, they’ve been infiltrating and leading every diabolical agenda globally. They have pretty much control of everything now but I am confident that God will soon intervene.
ICYMI, a re-post of a note from Escape Key that is particularly illuminating in this connection. Quoting verbatim:
"The system they construct is context-agnostic.
Replace the 'ethical' SDGs with racial purity, and you're in Nazi Germany. Replace with 'duty towards the collective' and you're in the Soviet Union. Replace it with 'Silly Hat Thursdays', and . . .
• The NGFS would produce silly hat scenarios.
• The Basel Committee would translate them into capital requirements for hat-deficient entities.
• ISO would publish a hat management system standard.
• FATF would grey-list jurisdictions with insufficient hat compliance.
• CBAM would levy charges on imports from countries with low hat-wearing rates.
• CBDC payment at the coffee shop would clear, conditional on hat verification.
And it would feel normal. Because the ethic would have been endorsed by the Vatican, the Crown, and the scientific consensus. The IPCC equivalent would have published hat-necessity projections. The SDG equivalent would include Universal Hat Access as Goal 18. The MSM would explain why hat resistance is rooted in privilege. The platforms would flag hat-scepticism as misinformation.
And anyone who said 'this is insane, it's just hats' would be told they were a hat-denier threatening public safety.
Should a system which can enforce something that obviously silly with identical efficiency even be allowed to exist?"
Escape Key's answer, at least, should be obvious.
Omg dude. Nailed it.
I spent hours reading your research and going sideways, leading from one rabbit hole to another. Fascinating how it all morphed into the monstrous machine it is today. Thx for sharing your expertise.
The German National Socialists appeared to articulate a structural counterpoint to the stranglehold of the City of London on European commerce and potentially at least, European unity based on economic co-operation. ESC you do indeed construct incredibly detailed and valuable analysis. I note that two key figures are referenced, French Foreign Minister Robert Schuman and French economist and diplomat Jean Monnet. A small detail, but one step in which one wonders how it fits exactly into the described operational framework outlined going forward? Quote: "It is not known whether either (Schuman and Monnet) were directly aware of the 1942 plan written by nine Nazi-era authors, a detailed economic plan later adopted in the Treaty of Rome in 1957." "The system the Nazi leaders laid out in detail mirrors what was later adopted in the Treaty of Rome in 1957." However, you omit 'The Schuman Declaration' of May 9, 1950, which seems a seminal step and leaves a temporal void. It proposed the creation of a European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), which was established by the Treaty of Paris in 1951. 'Building on the success of the ECSC, the six member states (France, West Germany, Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg) sought to expand their cooperation to other economic sectors. This led to the signing of the Treaty of Rome on March 25, 1957, which established the European Economic Community (EEC) and the European Atomic Energy Community (EURATOM)'. The History of the European Common Market June 27, 2024. https://historianmaniac.blogspot.com/2024/06/the-history-of-european-common-market.html
Brilliant research again.
Wolf in sheep's clothing.
They’ve been planning for centuries. My hunch is that the French ‘revolution’ was their first big win and since then, they’ve been infiltrating and leading every diabolical agenda globally. They have pretty much control of everything now but I am confident that God will soon intervene.
Clothing apparel for the French "revolution" included "the Phrygian cap", which was also the symbol of the most recent Paris Olympics.
Huh! Not surprising. Those pesky freemasons.
Impressive work. Needs to be archived like the previous ones as references.
Done. Release coming.