Sometimes I wonder if the whole setup of humanity is just to find out if we will ever join together in a world-wide 'White Hat Ride' to crush these freedom-smashing, murdering 'entities' once and for all. Riding together, joining minds and hearts en masse - aware at last of our 'Controller's' true nature and intent and therefore riding together to end their miserable wet dream of robotizing all of us into their obedient slaves - or killing us if we object. No amount of technical 'brilliance' can ever compare with the true freedom to become what Creation hoped we would Free Will ourselves to be. That is/was the obvious Intention- and this unfolding horror show of 'ethics' such as, "climate change", "sustainability", "esg", "dei", "equity", etc. - ad nauseam - is the transparent cover for a PTB grab for "full spectrum dominance" over all of us without end. There must come a stirring from deep within - and among us all - to boldly stand and reach for the sword of deepest Truth - a truth that naturally dwells in the hearts of all people of honor and good faith. A broad-based firm refusal to accept this odious 'Plan' and a relentless determination to put it to an end.
Would society accept its own demise, what possible advertisement could make even the lowest of humans give up free will. Yes, I know it happens every day and as the destruction of the middle class continues and the invasion of all western countries continues etc. they will use this misery to sell us a new form of slavery, AI & Technocracy under the guise of, it's good for you. It would be nice if the realizers could be left alone to exist as a separate society, but they can never leave well enough alone and would hunt us down. I, to be selfish, am happy I am older and got to at least understand and enjoy the bit of fake freedom I lived through. Just plain terrifying.
A "moral justification for centralised power and rigid social stratification," is a misunderstanding of how morals actually work.
Morals come from communities, from healthy cooperation and competition inside of communities. When our societies communities are rich, varied, and power is distributed through the natural hierarchies of different communities, morality is enriched throughout.
When one self-labelled "central community" enforces it's moral values on other communities, it destroys them and doing so degrades the overall morality of individual communities and their ability to participate in and contribute to a higher moral value.
To your health, Tracy
Founder: Healthicine, the Arts and Sciences of Health and Healthiness
It isn't, no, because it's carefully planned and managed.
'Science' becomes an imperative, through conversion to ethics (Collegium International).
This ethic then is converted into an arts direction by the WAAS, fused into general culture by UNESCO, and global citizen education where it becomes morality - also UNESCO.
Hermann Cohen then tell you about religion - he considers that little but a tool of moral imprinting morality, which explains Laudato Si and Laudate Deum.
Then we have Ken Wilber's integral theory, which relates to 'rights versus responsibilities'. Clare Graves and Marc Gafni in effect work on the first-person side of that particular scam.
And Wilber, Jonathan Haidt and Richard Shweder tells you about moral foundations - ie, hierarchical ethics, where 'cosmic ethics' reigns supreme above planetary ethics and humanitarian.
They have spent a fortune of time, creating this entire instrument of brainwashing, which explains why absolutely everyone is in complete sync; through business (CSR/ESG) to education (global citizen), to religion (Laudato Si/Laudate Deum), to governance (United Nations; Gordon Brown's investigation into 'Rights and Responsibilities' in 2020).
And as for rights versus responsibilities, Leo Swidler (collaborator with Hans Kung on the latter's A Global Ethic from 1993) stated in 1995 that these were the 'middle layer' leading to the top layer of 'global ethics', where the foundation is essentially collectivism. And Hans Kung was a senior theologian at the Second Vatican where catholocism was finally corrupted, with Swidler launching the Global Dialogue Initiative in 1978, which investigated... a global ethic.
I can carry on here. All of this has been long time in the planning, ensuring that every aspect of society, with every organisation, every agency eventually corrupted for its long term use to align with all of this.
A can even point to Paul Carus's role, chairing the 1893 Parliament of the World's Religions being the spwning side of much of this - with Carus launching the Interfaith movement in those days; the same which the Huxleys collaborated on, after which Teilhard's aligned ideology (where his most famous book has a foreword by Julian Huxley) was fused into the Second Vatican by Henri le Lubac. And as for Kung's 'A Global Ethic' - that was launched at the centenerary event; at the 1993 Parliament of the World's Religions.
The level of planning and precision of execution is frankly staggering. We are dealing with exceptionally brilliant people here, and they don't misunderstand how anything works. No, they rather corrupt the very meaning of every word, every term, every phrase, every paragraph, every chapter, every book and every author.
May I crop this reply as a screen shot & with your permission, post it on X please? The strategic overview is what so many people need to understand & our Education System (& Academia) has so many in Stockholm Syndrome defending the very mechanisms of their enslavement to this. Lauding it with the approval of their own conscience.
Fantastic article btw - shared. With your inclusion of the metaphysics & philosophy being negated, our work’s converging. This, in practise, attempts to deal the final deal blow to Natural Law, upon which popular sovereignty & self governance are predicated.
This is why Harari et al are so brazen in proclaiming ‘Free Will is gone’. Without popular sovereignty & self governance there is no self determination, no free will - only compliance with collectivist adaptive systems of control, with 24/7 real time tracking of that compliance & consequences regarding access to whatever systems you’re reliant on, if you don’t comply.
You know, as dark as the idea is, I can understand why men would envision it. I hate to say this, because I am a kind man who loves us all (most at least), but I just do not like us. Fallen? Understatement of all eternity. We downright suck. Haven’t we learned that yet? I can see someone deciding that the perpetual project to perfect the human soul is a lost cause, and that it is only through total mastery of the material that we can transform this into anything other than a nightmare headed toward its own destruction. I don’t want to live in the world you described, but I also don’t want to live in this one. This world has never been kind to me. I hope you’ll forgive me if I’m not on the barricades to defend it. I’m reminded of The Terminator 2 when Sarah watches her son playing with the robot. She concludes that, in the end, he’s better than all the biological drunks and assholes that preceded the robot in that paternal role. Maybe that’s all wrong. But I don’t want to be saved from what’s coming only to be re-imprisoned in what was.
Sometimes I wonder if the whole setup of humanity is just to find out if we will ever join together in a world-wide 'White Hat Ride' to crush these freedom-smashing, murdering 'entities' once and for all. Riding together, joining minds and hearts en masse - aware at last of our 'Controller's' true nature and intent and therefore riding together to end their miserable wet dream of robotizing all of us into their obedient slaves - or killing us if we object. No amount of technical 'brilliance' can ever compare with the true freedom to become what Creation hoped we would Free Will ourselves to be. That is/was the obvious Intention- and this unfolding horror show of 'ethics' such as, "climate change", "sustainability", "esg", "dei", "equity", etc. - ad nauseam - is the transparent cover for a PTB grab for "full spectrum dominance" over all of us without end. There must come a stirring from deep within - and among us all - to boldly stand and reach for the sword of deepest Truth - a truth that naturally dwells in the hearts of all people of honor and good faith. A broad-based firm refusal to accept this odious 'Plan' and a relentless determination to put it to an end.
Would society accept its own demise, what possible advertisement could make even the lowest of humans give up free will. Yes, I know it happens every day and as the destruction of the middle class continues and the invasion of all western countries continues etc. they will use this misery to sell us a new form of slavery, AI & Technocracy under the guise of, it's good for you. It would be nice if the realizers could be left alone to exist as a separate society, but they can never leave well enough alone and would hunt us down. I, to be selfish, am happy I am older and got to at least understand and enjoy the bit of fake freedom I lived through. Just plain terrifying.
A "moral justification for centralised power and rigid social stratification," is a misunderstanding of how morals actually work.
Morals come from communities, from healthy cooperation and competition inside of communities. When our societies communities are rich, varied, and power is distributed through the natural hierarchies of different communities, morality is enriched throughout.
When one self-labelled "central community" enforces it's moral values on other communities, it destroys them and doing so degrades the overall morality of individual communities and their ability to participate in and contribute to a higher moral value.
To your health, Tracy
Founder: Healthicine, the Arts and Sciences of Health and Healthiness
It isn't, no, because it's carefully planned and managed.
'Science' becomes an imperative, through conversion to ethics (Collegium International).
This ethic then is converted into an arts direction by the WAAS, fused into general culture by UNESCO, and global citizen education where it becomes morality - also UNESCO.
Hermann Cohen then tell you about religion - he considers that little but a tool of moral imprinting morality, which explains Laudato Si and Laudate Deum.
Then we have Ken Wilber's integral theory, which relates to 'rights versus responsibilities'. Clare Graves and Marc Gafni in effect work on the first-person side of that particular scam.
And Wilber, Jonathan Haidt and Richard Shweder tells you about moral foundations - ie, hierarchical ethics, where 'cosmic ethics' reigns supreme above planetary ethics and humanitarian.
They have spent a fortune of time, creating this entire instrument of brainwashing, which explains why absolutely everyone is in complete sync; through business (CSR/ESG) to education (global citizen), to religion (Laudato Si/Laudate Deum), to governance (United Nations; Gordon Brown's investigation into 'Rights and Responsibilities' in 2020).
And as for rights versus responsibilities, Leo Swidler (collaborator with Hans Kung on the latter's A Global Ethic from 1993) stated in 1995 that these were the 'middle layer' leading to the top layer of 'global ethics', where the foundation is essentially collectivism. And Hans Kung was a senior theologian at the Second Vatican where catholocism was finally corrupted, with Swidler launching the Global Dialogue Initiative in 1978, which investigated... a global ethic.
I can carry on here. All of this has been long time in the planning, ensuring that every aspect of society, with every organisation, every agency eventually corrupted for its long term use to align with all of this.
A can even point to Paul Carus's role, chairing the 1893 Parliament of the World's Religions being the spwning side of much of this - with Carus launching the Interfaith movement in those days; the same which the Huxleys collaborated on, after which Teilhard's aligned ideology (where his most famous book has a foreword by Julian Huxley) was fused into the Second Vatican by Henri le Lubac. And as for Kung's 'A Global Ethic' - that was launched at the centenerary event; at the 1993 Parliament of the World's Religions.
The level of planning and precision of execution is frankly staggering. We are dealing with exceptionally brilliant people here, and they don't misunderstand how anything works. No, they rather corrupt the very meaning of every word, every term, every phrase, every paragraph, every chapter, every book and every author.
They leave nothing to chance.
May I crop this reply as a screen shot & with your permission, post it on X please? The strategic overview is what so many people need to understand & our Education System (& Academia) has so many in Stockholm Syndrome defending the very mechanisms of their enslavement to this. Lauding it with the approval of their own conscience.
do as you please, well, within limits of course :)
Fantastic article btw - shared. With your inclusion of the metaphysics & philosophy being negated, our work’s converging. This, in practise, attempts to deal the final deal blow to Natural Law, upon which popular sovereignty & self governance are predicated.
This is why Harari et al are so brazen in proclaiming ‘Free Will is gone’. Without popular sovereignty & self governance there is no self determination, no free will - only compliance with collectivist adaptive systems of control, with 24/7 real time tracking of that compliance & consequences regarding access to whatever systems you’re reliant on, if you don’t comply.
You know, as dark as the idea is, I can understand why men would envision it. I hate to say this, because I am a kind man who loves us all (most at least), but I just do not like us. Fallen? Understatement of all eternity. We downright suck. Haven’t we learned that yet? I can see someone deciding that the perpetual project to perfect the human soul is a lost cause, and that it is only through total mastery of the material that we can transform this into anything other than a nightmare headed toward its own destruction. I don’t want to live in the world you described, but I also don’t want to live in this one. This world has never been kind to me. I hope you’ll forgive me if I’m not on the barricades to defend it. I’m reminded of The Terminator 2 when Sarah watches her son playing with the robot. She concludes that, in the end, he’s better than all the biological drunks and assholes that preceded the robot in that paternal role. Maybe that’s all wrong. But I don’t want to be saved from what’s coming only to be re-imprisoned in what was.