Mission: Zero Independence

Jun 16, 2023

I decided to move this across next, as something very significant has just appeared, which could do with this as supportive evidence.

Not that it’s required, I suppose, given the absurd scam that is the ‘Covid Inquiry’ currently taking place.

The point here is that when something in its title is declared ‘independent’, you can rest assured that it a) isn’t independent whatsoever, and b) almost certainly is on the hard left of the political spectrum.

This is no exception. None of the ‘researchers’ are independent. They all expressly work for the government, or their job is in a ‘sustainable’ sector already.

As if a ‘Net Zero’ acolyte would ever disagree with the verdict of this report.

On the 13th of January, 2023, the independent review of the UK's Net Zero was released in its final form. Thing is - it doesn’t appear terrible independent as far as I can tell.

Acknowledgements are here. A whole range of people contributed. Let's go through them, because I've failed to find anyone who could possibly claim they were 'independent'. They're either government lackeys, or they're 'sustainable' hacks.

A few examples - Sally Heard is the Head of the International Net Zero Hub.
Henna Deal is in the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero.
Jack Taylor is a Net Zero Strategy Advisor.
Joanna Carew is a Biomass Team Leader in the Climate Division of the Department of Energy.
And Massimiliano Verri is an Economic Advisor with Net Zero Skills Strategy in the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero.