A well described system which makes no allowance for change or dissent. Therefore, the only future outside of slavery is to be out of this system. A small group of non-believers working together. No one is going to change this system from inside of it or outside of it. A different group uninfected by this system. Save your kids and the future apart from it..
that's not a long term strategy. you *have* to fight, i fear. it's just a matter of whether you choose to delay. that's not advocacy of violence of course, do not misinterpret what i say.
It is more than an information war when one is fired for refusing to be raped (having something that you do not want stuck into you by a needle) or being drafted to go kill people in their home whom you have no grievance with or be killed yourself or just being refused a license to work and live. One does have to fight but inside their system which you have described so fully and so well, it is nearly impossible which is not to say do not try.
Thank you ESC for this new article, which admirably complements the previous one. I'm taking this opportunity to finish a text on "the algorithmic Leviathan," already inspired by "Ethica" and the comments.
I even tried to go further, without any pretension, by showing how ethical monism, and dualism, have entered a phase of transcendence through functional absorption, where everything becomes an adjustment variable, influenced by the system and the "algorithmic Leviathan," our new demon.
It's still a bit vague as formulated, but I'm working on it ^^
Thanks for writing this, it clarifies so much. Building on your first essay, you’ve perfectly mapped the internalisation process. Makes one wonder about our collective conscience's firmware updates, dosn't it? Very sharp.
I appreciate your ongoing representation of the mindset that both maps, defines and weights its 'accepted or internalised reality' as well as adapting within or being shaped and driven BY such judgements.
Self-reinforcing feedback loops can be seen as integral workability of life as workability—not just survival. I see this as psycho -physical or Spiritual—Commune-ication as a whole in all its 'parts'
But a self-imaged self-reinforcing feedback loop runs a negatively or segregatively defined sense of self relative to the 'Othered'.
That the assignment;'self' is used to represent existence and also invested image of judged existence is a level confusion—principally of projecting or assigning the creative (mind or intention) to the body (world). Hence mapping out or explicating judgements as means to set outcomes, as a developmental learning process for a consciousness construct of invested perception-response - a world gained at expense of awareness of Soul—where Soul represents awareness of existence as a Whole - not constructs of attempts to unify or regain a conflicted, split or fragmented Humpty Dumpty - such as 'all the king’s horses and all the king’s men' are driven to impose on a 'chaos' that is predicated and protected BY such judgements as the mind is phished by - and thus vested in as self-existence at odds with what now must be called 'denied or discarded reality'.
Judgement as set OVER and APART from (Self-Existence) posits a 'stake' of emotion-backed identity in variants of "I WANT IT THUS!"
This is readily observable in our ordinary moment or situation by the emotional react arising from a failed expectation. We don't recognise our internalised alignment in such programming without feedback, but the dissonance of such feedback is the basis for the 'learning development' of defences and controls of evasion, denial and redefining or redistributing of awareness of dissonance as a masking defence aligned in controls set against fear or threat of risk.
All the above is considered without a key fact; the maintaining of such a set of mind set is the willingness to share it - not in the sense of a truly shared father, nature or source, but in the sense of mutually agreed definitions running for the most part tacit or internalised as a basis for a separate self set over and against the Othered that it is driven both to Get Rid of (as dissonance) AND to gain possession and control over (power struggle).
Discernment within the living cannot be attained by the refining of ingenuity of intellectualised effort. As it is integrally 'Given' as the 'field of knowing' or Commune-ication - aka exchange of value. This has in effect been discarded or overmasked by a learning goal that generates its own curriculum of rules and filters as terms and conditions for withholding and withdrawing love, such as to operate 'conditional love' framed to 'special conditions' that cannot be maintained - hence such 'love' reveals the hate that it was made to mask over and mask out. Dissonance -an alarm for a state of leaning out of true - becomes a basis for guilting manipulations or 'control' that goes around and comes around as the currency of evasion and denial of 'blame-sacrifice' by diversion to the 'Othered'.
Responsibility for consciousness is in what we accept and internalise by giving forth in thought, word and deed. Awakening responsibility for joy in life (wholeness of being) must be willing to look on and abide through temptation to attack by attraction of guilt. The wish to attack guilt perceived in the Othered masks as morally justified or morally compelled, but moral integrality is a wholeness of being —a gift recognised in the giving and not a self-specialness by which an 'elect' get rid of their hate as a function of 'self-vindicating' possession and control.
Reality was never coopted to suppport self-illusions, nor does truth respond to Models that seek to run in its name. yet we have learned to be-live, suffer and die in variants of "I WANT IT THUS!" - which can seem positive as a special love grasped in form, or the special hate of being denied and deprived by treachery, rejection and abandonment.
The posit of a Living Will as distinct from a mind-set in a forced and split 'will' is not a new idea. "Thy will be done on earth as it Is in heaven" is dirctly associated with sustenance or connection, and release of 'debt-conflicts' in self as in other. Yielding not to an 'Other' but to a 'Field of knowing' that we neither manufacture of mis-take as our person.
Self-alienation can only persist within a capacity to tolerate dissonance as pain of life - on any or all levels, not merely the body.
I see we are each - and together brought inevitably to a crisis of decision, and that revelation of false from true requires or obligates acceptance of one as release of the other. But acceptance of the false can never be whole, and so cannot rest or know freedom - such as to have in fact chosen to delay of defer decision by insisting that freedom lies in opposition—by eradicating or subjugating the Othered.
There is no communication between the living and the dead concept given life to which a living one has given acceptance, identity and protection. But there Is Communication - within as without and as one.
why does it matter who i am? i get so many of these, why does that matter in the slightest?
i've dug up a large amount of documents, connected them historically, and derived logical deductions which, essentially, no-one else has. the September 17, 1969, Moynihan memo, for instance, should be making headline news as it suggests NATO should run global surveillance on the environment. i see no-one else who has even discussed this, nor do i see anyone discuss, nor connect, the May 23, 1972 US-USSR Cooperation on Environmental Protection treaty. yet, i always get these; "who are you"?
A well described system which makes no allowance for change or dissent. Therefore, the only future outside of slavery is to be out of this system. A small group of non-believers working together. No one is going to change this system from inside of it or outside of it. A different group uninfected by this system. Save your kids and the future apart from it..
that's not a long term strategy. you *have* to fight, i fear. it's just a matter of whether you choose to delay. that's not advocacy of violence of course, do not misinterpret what i say.
it very much is an information war.
It is more than an information war when one is fired for refusing to be raped (having something that you do not want stuck into you by a needle) or being drafted to go kill people in their home whom you have no grievance with or be killed yourself or just being refused a license to work and live. One does have to fight but inside their system which you have described so fully and so well, it is nearly impossible which is not to say do not try.
yes, but the monopoly on information is pivotal from their perspective. if that goes, nothing will hold. that's the point.
Yes, but on the other hand, they'll provide us with a free internet subscription, to better control us ^^
Until they come around your house for you lol
Thank you ESC for this new article, which admirably complements the previous one. I'm taking this opportunity to finish a text on "the algorithmic Leviathan," already inspired by "Ethica" and the comments.
I even tried to go further, without any pretension, by showing how ethical monism, and dualism, have entered a phase of transcendence through functional absorption, where everything becomes an adjustment variable, influenced by the system and the "algorithmic Leviathan," our new demon.
It's still a bit vague as formulated, but I'm working on it ^^
Thanks for writing this, it clarifies so much. Building on your first essay, you’ve perfectly mapped the internalisation process. Makes one wonder about our collective conscience's firmware updates, dosn't it? Very sharp.
I appreciate your ongoing representation of the mindset that both maps, defines and weights its 'accepted or internalised reality' as well as adapting within or being shaped and driven BY such judgements.
Self-reinforcing feedback loops can be seen as integral workability of life as workability—not just survival. I see this as psycho -physical or Spiritual—Commune-ication as a whole in all its 'parts'
But a self-imaged self-reinforcing feedback loop runs a negatively or segregatively defined sense of self relative to the 'Othered'.
That the assignment;'self' is used to represent existence and also invested image of judged existence is a level confusion—principally of projecting or assigning the creative (mind or intention) to the body (world). Hence mapping out or explicating judgements as means to set outcomes, as a developmental learning process for a consciousness construct of invested perception-response - a world gained at expense of awareness of Soul—where Soul represents awareness of existence as a Whole - not constructs of attempts to unify or regain a conflicted, split or fragmented Humpty Dumpty - such as 'all the king’s horses and all the king’s men' are driven to impose on a 'chaos' that is predicated and protected BY such judgements as the mind is phished by - and thus vested in as self-existence at odds with what now must be called 'denied or discarded reality'.
Judgement as set OVER and APART from (Self-Existence) posits a 'stake' of emotion-backed identity in variants of "I WANT IT THUS!"
This is readily observable in our ordinary moment or situation by the emotional react arising from a failed expectation. We don't recognise our internalised alignment in such programming without feedback, but the dissonance of such feedback is the basis for the 'learning development' of defences and controls of evasion, denial and redefining or redistributing of awareness of dissonance as a masking defence aligned in controls set against fear or threat of risk.
All the above is considered without a key fact; the maintaining of such a set of mind set is the willingness to share it - not in the sense of a truly shared father, nature or source, but in the sense of mutually agreed definitions running for the most part tacit or internalised as a basis for a separate self set over and against the Othered that it is driven both to Get Rid of (as dissonance) AND to gain possession and control over (power struggle).
Discernment within the living cannot be attained by the refining of ingenuity of intellectualised effort. As it is integrally 'Given' as the 'field of knowing' or Commune-ication - aka exchange of value. This has in effect been discarded or overmasked by a learning goal that generates its own curriculum of rules and filters as terms and conditions for withholding and withdrawing love, such as to operate 'conditional love' framed to 'special conditions' that cannot be maintained - hence such 'love' reveals the hate that it was made to mask over and mask out. Dissonance -an alarm for a state of leaning out of true - becomes a basis for guilting manipulations or 'control' that goes around and comes around as the currency of evasion and denial of 'blame-sacrifice' by diversion to the 'Othered'.
Responsibility for consciousness is in what we accept and internalise by giving forth in thought, word and deed. Awakening responsibility for joy in life (wholeness of being) must be willing to look on and abide through temptation to attack by attraction of guilt. The wish to attack guilt perceived in the Othered masks as morally justified or morally compelled, but moral integrality is a wholeness of being —a gift recognised in the giving and not a self-specialness by which an 'elect' get rid of their hate as a function of 'self-vindicating' possession and control.
Reality was never coopted to suppport self-illusions, nor does truth respond to Models that seek to run in its name. yet we have learned to be-live, suffer and die in variants of "I WANT IT THUS!" - which can seem positive as a special love grasped in form, or the special hate of being denied and deprived by treachery, rejection and abandonment.
The posit of a Living Will as distinct from a mind-set in a forced and split 'will' is not a new idea. "Thy will be done on earth as it Is in heaven" is dirctly associated with sustenance or connection, and release of 'debt-conflicts' in self as in other. Yielding not to an 'Other' but to a 'Field of knowing' that we neither manufacture of mis-take as our person.
Self-alienation can only persist within a capacity to tolerate dissonance as pain of life - on any or all levels, not merely the body.
I see we are each - and together brought inevitably to a crisis of decision, and that revelation of false from true requires or obligates acceptance of one as release of the other. But acceptance of the false can never be whole, and so cannot rest or know freedom - such as to have in fact chosen to delay of defer decision by insisting that freedom lies in opposition—by eradicating or subjugating the Othered.
There is no communication between the living and the dead concept given life to which a living one has given acceptance, identity and protection. But there Is Communication - within as without and as one.
Having learned or trained a mind
Blessings and appreciation from Sydney Australia.
Most important writer today, I’ll say.
Is this series AI?
Writer is frequently querying numerous AIs, mostly claude.
I had same question, first few reads.
But, recently, he’s been live (yet anonymously) interviewed by both Doc Malik and James Delingpole.
This real person, has an encyclopedic memory and has spent the time reading through the original source materials.
OK thanks, why does he remain anonymous? He is human yeah? lol
I’ve been on a number of podcasts but hey
Great! Not liking the way the Inet is going currently...
why does it matter who i am? i get so many of these, why does that matter in the slightest?
i've dug up a large amount of documents, connected them historically, and derived logical deductions which, essentially, no-one else has. the September 17, 1969, Moynihan memo, for instance, should be making headline news as it suggests NATO should run global surveillance on the environment. i see no-one else who has even discussed this, nor do i see anyone discuss, nor connect, the May 23, 1972 US-USSR Cooperation on Environmental Protection treaty. yet, i always get these; "who are you"?
who cares who i am?
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/deception-day?utm_source=publication-search