Sri Lanka
As I was going through the threads I previously posted on Twitter, I wasn’t quite sure on which topic to start. So why Sri Lanka?
Because in many ways, it’s a microcosm of things to come.
It shows the genuine impact of implementing United Nations’ lunatic Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
It highlights the indifference by world leaders when said blows up.
It broadcasts the unwillingness of the UN and the WEF to accept responsibility.
It provides an opportunity to point out how the ‘trusted’ media lies, distorts and omits pivotal information.
And it without the shadow of a doubt shows the lack of willingness to recognise the issue, and globally deviate from the original plan as it all comes crashing down - regardless of cost to human suffering.
And finally, it presents an opportunity to expose the public-private-partnership psychopaths for what they are, as they scoop up assets on the cheap in the ensuing firesale held by collapsing nations, aka suicidal nations implementing the SDGs. Confessions of an Economic Hit Man.
In other words, it’s almost perfect.
-
In the summer of 2022, Sri Lanka collapsed. Here are a few clips, including one of the presidential palace being stormed by protestors.
Naturally, the MSM was quick on the scene to outline what supposedly was the issue. The BBC, for instance, in July 2022, claimed that it was caused by ‘an economic crisis’.
The second article gives more detail, however, you have to read it all the way to the very end to realise something isn’t quite right here. Some very important detail is lacking.
But what exactly went wrong? Only a few years prior, the Prime Minister had claimed he’d make his country rich by 2025. A lofty ambition given this was penned in 2018, and the ‘Vision’ outlined in 2017.
And do note that I have to source this via archive. Because the WEF - naturally - took down the article when it all came crashing down. There’s that lack of accepting responsibility. Anyway, penned by the PM, Ranil Wickremesinghe. Naturally, a member of the WEF.
The plan was titled ‘Vision 2025’, and had not gone unnoticed. Here’s the World Bank lauding the goal.
In 2015, all 193 nations adopted the United Nations’ Agenda 2030, which is another way to say Sustainable Development Goals - SDGs.
Sri Lanka, naturally, were on board. And quickly, all sorts of ridiculous claims were made, promising to integrate some aspect of the unachievable.
And I do mean unachievable. In this context, the SDGs are absolutely impossible to implement as they are mutually exclusive.
A commission was formed, tasked with implementing UN’s SDGs. Here’s a link to the official page on the matter, full of resources and details on the implementation.
The outcome of this commission was this report on the matter, outlining in detail what should be transformed, and how.
Green growth, Agenda 2030, SDGs, sustainable, environmental/societal constraints, environment, respect for nature, sustainable capacity, resource use. Oh, not forgetting inclusion, and social justice. Well done. Bravo. This receives an impressive score on the cringe scale.
Regardless, the document is the real deal, let there be no doubt about that. It’s signed by the president and the prime minister, along with a slew of other dignitaries of the sort, who typically ensure that their own name is crammed in at the very top, in spite of not actually doing any work whatsoever. Well done.
Chock full of ‘Agenda 2030’ and ‘sustainable’ keywords of flair. No way to deny this. Absolutely no way - which is why they all ignored it post-disaster.
A key issue is repeatedly pointed out to be farming. And do make a note here that the vast majority are small scale farmers. We’re not talking about industrialised, western (think Dutch) farming methods, scaled up for maximum yield from least input, ie efficiency. No, we’re talking family farms, each planting what they subside on plus a little extra sold for income. Small scale. This is worthy of note expressly because all these crazy documents repeatedly detail how to ‘improve upon small-scale farming methods in developing nations’. These words I’ve seen so many times throughout UN literature that they deserve their own abbreviation.
Regardless, farming is unsustainable; it uses too much water, and too many chemical fertilisers which should be replaced by organics. And these absolutely couple up with express goals in the SDGs as we shall see later. They are clearly, undeniably SDG objectives.
And that’s what I mean by the SDGs being mutually exclusive. Improving yields in small scale farming without the use of chemical fertiliser is an absolute pipe dream. It cannot be achieved with present technology. In fact, taking away said leads to disaster without the shadow of a doubt.
But the uptake was slow. Very slow. In fact, it was that slow, the President was compelled into action. So on April the 22nd, 2021, the President issue a degree banning the import - and hence use - of chemical fertiliser. Make note of NO economic motive being present - in fact, he accepts it might overall be a fiscal net negative. Also, pay attention to the weasel wording. Every single time you find this duplicitous phrasing, ‘ensure the right of the people to access a non-toxic and balanced diet‘, this incessant framing as though if it’s legitimately for the people.
Farmers protested, of course, but politicians simply no longer care unless they feel threatened for their own safety. They’ve over time become completely disconnected from those they are alleged to represent. Thomas Jefferson supposedly had a quote in this regard; “When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny”. Whether he actually said this matters little. It’s certainly in line with his general view of the world.
So in spite of said farmer protests, the decree was carried out. And the impact was as brutal as it was swift. Agricultural output collapsed. And that is no exaggeration.
Only a few months later, the decree was overturned. But the damage was done. The political class had sacrificed their people on the high altar of their overlords.
The person most obvously to blame, President Gotabaya Rajapaksa, who banned the import of chemical fertilisers immediately stepped down with grace, accepting full responsibiliy. In fact, the way he dealt with the situation, outlining expressly how the UN’s goals had brought the nation down serves as a high mark of integrity in politics.
Just kidding, he lied about it being caused by ‘the economic crisis’, and fleed, never to be heard of again.
And in that regard, here’s one of the more overlooked parts of this story. The damage was bad - very bad. In fact, it was that bad, UNICEF stepped in to appeal for help. Naturally, claiming that it was an ‘economic crisis’, and there’s that lack of accepting responsibility again, given UNICEF being part of the UN.
But the reason why this is worthy of note is because the United Nations did not care. The WEF did not care. Global senior politicians didn’t care. And nothing was done to correct the course of the SDG ship whatsoever. It was omitted, ignored, and silenced. In fact, I would expect the only legit interest of the WEF billionaire class here, was on how to scoop up assets on the cheap during the resulting firesale.
Because, and I again want to make myself absolutely explicit - the goals relating to farm use of water and chemicals are expressly in the SDGs. This is without the shadow of a doubt the primary cause of the agricultural output collapse, which kicked all of this into motion. This is the express fault of the United Nations’ lunatic Sustainable Development Goals.
So let’s loop back to the BBC. Because their reporting was outright scandalous on the topic. The ‘Trusted News Initiative’ straight up lied in their reporting. This absolute refusal to address the legit cause of this shows, without the shadow of a doubt, whose side they’re on.
And their ‘Trusted News Initative’ has since turned into ‘BBC Verify’. It’s the same thing, of course, dubiously politically convenient ‘fact’ ‘checks’, and staffed with perennial liar, Marianna Spring who I will get to a bit later. And in that regard, from where do you think they got the name?
More on ‘Verified’ later, and Melissa Fleming in particular. Because she is yet another of those communist rats who needs to be outed for her role in all of this.
But the point here is that you cannot trust the BBC to cover the news accurately. They will omit, distort, project, bully, ignore, ridicule and censor in order to cover the news the way they think it should be covered. And ‘trusted’ in this regard doesn’t mean what you think it does. It means it can be trusted to protect the interests of the few, the WEF, the United Nations, and most of all - the Sustainable Development Goals. When dealing with these organisations, you quickly realise that words commonly have a secondary meaning which is not meant to be brought up.
So when this arrives on our shores - and it’s on the way, clearly, as can be seen by recent developments in the Netherlands - expect the BBC to cover it in expressly the same way they covered Sri Lanka’s “economic collapse”.
Which is to say by expressly lying to you.
And here are Tucker’s thoughts on it all.