In December 2025, the Wall Street Journal revealed ‘Project Sunrise‘ — a $112 billion plan to transform Gaza into a ‘high-tech metropolis‘ over twenty years. The blueprint – developed by Jared Kushner and Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff – envisions luxury coastal resorts, AI-optimised power grids, and high-speed rail.
An excellent article, both highly informative and thought provoking. I don't know if the war criminal Anthony Charles Lynton Blair had any involvement with this initiative, but it bears many of the hallmarks of when he was Prime Minister of my country. He was keen to promote 'Public Private Partnerships,' in which the taxpayer funded all the risk and corporate capitalism pocketed all of the benefits. (Nice work if you can get it.) This is both infinitely more pernicious and brutal than what happened in Britain, but it's straight out of the same playbook.
Ah yes! Tom Paine, an Englishman who has been excluded almost entirely from the history curriculum of English schools. I wonder why? As an Englishman, Paine recognised something very different was raking place from the England of his birth in the nascent United States; and he played no small part in shaping it. Though it's true to say that the original geometry of this new entity - which Paine helped draft - was prone to distortion even from the beginning, much to dear Tom's chagrin.
As an Englishman, Paine realised he was participating in the creation of something that never had existed in the country of his birth and it is not permitted there even to this day. The ordinary people of this new political entity (well, except for plantation slaves and women) were to be "citizens", not "subjects", as Tom had been in England. Subjects? To what was Thomas Paine subject? Back in Paine's day it was the King, a member of a German aristocratic dynasty had manoeuvred its way into political power in England by several sleights of hand over the previous century. Nowadays, we English are all subjects of the Crown. It includes the King, but also includes rich and powerful interests and other nebulous and shadowy groups that Anthony Charles Lynton Blair and his ilk may want in their 'inclusive' governments. What's most important though is that all of those ordinary people - the subjects - are mandated to pay their taxes to the Crown.
the crown, as in the monarch, has virtually no genuine power. lionel curtis in 1918 wrote a long section in iirc his book on the commonwealth detailing how the monarchy had attempted to regain power, and how they'd been blocked. he wanted the monarchy to become the pet mascot of the project.
the real power lies with the central banks, and those who control accreditation.
leonard s woolf's 'international government' from 1916 details the government structure in use today, though that traces back to the london bank clearinghouse model 1790-1860.
Except that it would be more correct to state 'monarch, as in Crown. Moreover, a crown is a metallic band, usually worn around the head of a monarch The Crown (note the definite article and capital letter) is something rather different. While I have praised some of your research and insight, nevertheless it has its epistemic limitations.
Government is the most retarded invention man has ever created. Let's waste another $112 billion that will be blown up in the years ahead. Maybe we can get the Somali's to fund this as they now have a pile of about 1 trillion taxpayer dollars. Emergency? Only to make someone super rich before the world falls apart.
If a great deal of this passes through the Knesset, I'm asking for a friend who bankrolled the coming into existence of the Knesset?
a coincidence
Good to know. I'm a coincidence theorist.
An excellent article, both highly informative and thought provoking. I don't know if the war criminal Anthony Charles Lynton Blair had any involvement with this initiative, but it bears many of the hallmarks of when he was Prime Minister of my country. He was keen to promote 'Public Private Partnerships,' in which the taxpayer funded all the risk and corporate capitalism pocketed all of the benefits. (Nice work if you can get it.) This is both infinitely more pernicious and brutal than what happened in Britain, but it's straight out of the same playbook.
oh it's the same lineage
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-third-way?utm_source=publication-search
Ah yes! Tom Paine, an Englishman who has been excluded almost entirely from the history curriculum of English schools. I wonder why? As an Englishman, Paine recognised something very different was raking place from the England of his birth in the nascent United States; and he played no small part in shaping it. Though it's true to say that the original geometry of this new entity - which Paine helped draft - was prone to distortion even from the beginning, much to dear Tom's chagrin.
As an Englishman, Paine realised he was participating in the creation of something that never had existed in the country of his birth and it is not permitted there even to this day. The ordinary people of this new political entity (well, except for plantation slaves and women) were to be "citizens", not "subjects", as Tom had been in England. Subjects? To what was Thomas Paine subject? Back in Paine's day it was the King, a member of a German aristocratic dynasty had manoeuvred its way into political power in England by several sleights of hand over the previous century. Nowadays, we English are all subjects of the Crown. It includes the King, but also includes rich and powerful interests and other nebulous and shadowy groups that Anthony Charles Lynton Blair and his ilk may want in their 'inclusive' governments. What's most important though is that all of those ordinary people - the subjects - are mandated to pay their taxes to the Crown.
the crown, as in the monarch, has virtually no genuine power. lionel curtis in 1918 wrote a long section in iirc his book on the commonwealth detailing how the monarchy had attempted to regain power, and how they'd been blocked. he wanted the monarchy to become the pet mascot of the project.
the real power lies with the central banks, and those who control accreditation.
leonard s woolf's 'international government' from 1916 details the government structure in use today, though that traces back to the london bank clearinghouse model 1790-1860.
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/international-government?utm_source=publication-search
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/own-nothing-control-everything?utm_source=publication-search
Well stated.
Except that it would be more correct to state 'monarch, as in Crown. Moreover, a crown is a metallic band, usually worn around the head of a monarch The Crown (note the definite article and capital letter) is something rather different. While I have praised some of your research and insight, nevertheless it has its epistemic limitations.
when people speak of the crown, they commonly speak of the monarch. either way, the crown estate is not owned by the monarch.
but as documented in 'international government', the fabian society gradually stripped them of their powers. and now, they're circling again.
"The Purpose Of a System Is What It Does"
Or, as I've been hammering for 20 years+, the outcome was the goal.
Government is the most retarded invention man has ever created. Let's waste another $112 billion that will be blown up in the years ahead. Maybe we can get the Somali's to fund this as they now have a pile of about 1 trillion taxpayer dollars. Emergency? Only to make someone super rich before the world falls apart.
Appreciation and blessings from Sydney Australia.
After watching the documentary, "The Agenda" where the writers give esc credit, they will accomplish that agenda. In fact, they already have.
Thank you for this brilliant piece, translated in French here : https://zanzibar.substack.com/p/larchitecture-durgence