The grand Chessboard.

If you didn’t suss out that this was a scam until late on - don’t feel bad. This was the single largest psychological operation in history bar none, which was planned at least a decade in advance. It spanned a pervasive 24/7 television campaign. It featured every radio continuously broadcasting condensed fear. Newspapers competed over who could produce the most horrifying, exaggerated headlines. Celebrities queued up to soapbox. The internet… well, the internet was more suspicious at first, which then led to censorship and monitoring.

And first of all - why did the media line up with the narrative? Because, in the UK, media was threatened with ofcom retaliation should they refuse to play ball. And advertising. Very hard to say no, when a very large part of your advertisement income comes from the pharmaceutical industry, as was the case in the US, or when the media is directly reliant upon government funding, as was the case in NZ (and other nations).

But the internet was a tougher nut to crack, because while open debate was almost entirely elminated on Twitter and Facebook, more underground sites thrived in this environment, with the Telegram userbase surpassing that of Twitter in late 2020.

Additional sites gradually appeared. Parler. Gettr. TruthSocial. They threw their best lines at it. Racist! Fascists! Homophobes! Sexists! You must not use Telegram or you’re a NAZI, you understand - a NAZI!

But it didn’t work. Every month, more people would join the channels still open for free debate, while communities were building the next generation technology, focusing decentralised, distributed networks. And that, in turn, meant that people would return to Facebook and Twitter in increasingly belligerent moods. I, personally, saw comments swing from 50:1 commenting on a Danish Facebook group to 10:1, to 3:1. I saw WHO posts go from a hotspot for sycophants, to be bombarded with comments, calling them out. I saw Boris Johnson progressively go from thousands upon thousands of comments and ‘likes’ to hundreds, and occasionally, tens. Naturally, all positive. All negative comments were ‘taken care of’. Amusingly, however, the live streams showed the real picture, and the narrative had absolutely turned by the end of November. In fact, as Omicron arrived - and fizzled — it looked as though 2022 was going to see a major turn on public opinion on Facebook. And the chats in Danish groups? By now, most comments were anti-narrative.

And then I was banned. Censoring ‘problematic’ posts, removing inconvenient official data, and posting absolutely factual information to be removed for ‘spamming’ and other absurd reasons wasn’t enough. They started banning people over nothing. But even that didn’t do the trick.

No, the internet turned out a serious problem to the players of this game, which is why they now attack this problem via changing public law via their various influencing groups.

The primary objective of the game was Digital IDs for everyone.

This would naturally lead to CBDCs, which was obvious to many. So, in some sense, they’re the same goal - except they’re not, because Digital IDs also allow something far more insidious - global surveillance. That, too, we’ll go through later on, but the evidence here is significant.

In order to carry out the master plan, it required a lot of players, including Neil Ferguson, whose flawed, untested junk source code was used to drum up the scary predictions, in spite of never having actually been ‘peer reviewed’, and also in spite of having previously cooked up laughable predictions back in 2005.

We also had Boris Johnson lying about being ill. If he genuinely was this ill, no way he’d have been rather as casual as was the case later on during ‘partygate’.

Of course, Matt Hancock also played an instrumental role early on, and as did Patrick Vallance and Christopher Whitty’s seemingly rational approaches, guarantees to always present worst case as best.

In the US, naturally, we had Deborah Birx and Anthony Fauci, happily lying through their teeth. In fact, in the background, we had even more - like Jeremy Farrar of Wellcome covering up the lab leak theory, probably by bribing Kristian Andersen to the tune of millions in ‘research grants’ in collaboration with Edward Holmes'; “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2”.

But two instrumental figures who escaped much scrutiny in the early days were the power couple Heidi Larson and Peter Piot. The Vaccine Confidence Project was Larson’s undertaking, while Piot dealt as an advisor to senior leaders behind the curtains. They were anywhere and everywhere in the lead up to covid, during the early stages. In fact, looking back now, it’s astonishing that their omnipresence didn’t suggest something strange was going on. Heidi is still out there, hustling with her new venture “Global Listening Project”. More on that later, where we’ll also look into what Piot’s been up to since he allegedly retired.

We also have the WHO’s very own Tedros, independent SAGE’s resident communist, Susan Mitchie, and naturally, Bill Gates. In fact, more than anyone, Bill Gates has a tendency of showing up where you least expect him. And most. He also has an incredible 100% hit rate in terms of donations to the top institutions relating to covid - Wellcome, WHO, GAVI, CGD. All funded by Gates, and more.

We also have the EU’s Thierry Breton, whose job it was to sneak Digital ID past the eyes of the public, Ursula vd Leyen, who concocted the vaccine deal with Pfizer and then destroyed the evidence. As for IDs, based on Claire Sullivan’s early work with Tony Blair, this moved through the Center for Global Development, from where Joseph Atick brought it to the Alan Turing Institute, and Alan Gelb to the World Bank, from where they were sneaked into the EU digital vaccination certificate, as presented in 2021 by Alan Gelb, and recently adopted by the WHO.

But all of this also straddles into defense, where Georgetown’s JC Smart stands out, plus DARPA and CDC were relied upon for funding, and NORAD, and GSMA providing the essential framework for global surveillance. All of this naturally with private companies as well - many funded by Gates and Rockefeller - who take said framework and cleverly disguise it as a concern for health or climate change which we need to immediately roll out (or you’ll be portrayed as wanting to kill grannies and infants). Reality is the topic - climate change or health - it doesn’t matter. The solution is always the same, only the reasoning changes. The reason that obviously, the stated cause is just a vehicle.

And all of this relied on compliant political leader, some of whom partied while telling us to mask up and stay indoors. Others worked at the UN, driving the Sustainable Development Goals, and over through the WHO who currently attempt to push through the EU digital vaccination certificate (ie, Digital ID), along with the pandemic accord. We then, furthermore have parliamentarian members, like UK’s Tory MP Damian Collins, who hid his membership of the Transatlantic High Level Working Group on Content Moderation Online and Freedom of Expression from the public. Oh wait, isn’t he the MP who pushes the ‘Online Safety Act’?

Commonly, the UN SDG’s were the stated objective. But the UN were also active on the censorship front where they with the BBC founded the ‘Trusted News Initiative’, and ‘Verified’, in collaboration with professional agitators, Purpose Campaigns, whose founder just by incident is a WEF Young Global Leader, and has a track record of working with Bill Gates and George Soros. As for the WEF, they signed an agreement with the UN on cooperation on Agenda 2030, which essentially is the SDGs, and which contain a little known goal 16.9, serving as trojan horse for digital identities. The BBC then went on to form Verify, and staff it with professional liar, Marianna Spring, who is seemingly completely incapable of telling the truth, even when put on the spot.

And there’s more. Much, much more to all of this. I haven’t even attempted to include other pivital figures like Christian Drosten, Peter Dazsak, or Gill Whitehead. If I did, I could essentially write about this forever.

It was an insanely complex operation with lots of moving parts. It’s actually rather impressive that it didn’t collapse in on itself before it did. But perhaps that’s why the pandemic exercise, Event 201, was kicked off right after the UN’s ‘Decade of Action’ was launched, marking an aggressive push for SDG implementation.

Oh, and did I mention that said coincided with the very first positive covid sample? Or that the immunisation Agenda website was registered at the very same time? Or that BBC’s ‘Trusted News Initiative’ also kicked off at that very same time? No.

Well, buckle up. Because there are so many unbelievably extraordinary coincidences that it’s somewhat hard to keep track of.

Or believe.