The one ring that bound all other 'magical power rings' might be called Technos.
Technologism uses predictive modelling as power to shape, force, mitigate or escape outcomes. Its 'control' operates as rules and filters of limitation.
Esc offers much worldly information on the coordination of different 'functions' that effectively run dark, and would not hold or stand in light. You could say darkness became the standard, by which light was replaced by artifice or 'gaslighting' of an intellectual arrogance.
Have you come across the Russian word Upravleniye in your research? I kept running into as the economic vision which tied to the global education I had documented in my book.
It also transfers to what you laid out here and why the assumption was that the Upravleniye vision was to be implemented globally.
This also fits with another word that kept coming up--Engrenage. The graphic for enmeshed gears to illustrate how a vision is to work and why if you are only familiar with a part or one or two of the gears a non-insider can miss how the whole structure was designed to work together to transform multiple areas.
Fascinating, thank you. Reading your articles is like doing another university degree, but a much better one. This is what they should have been teaching us in my Economics degree in the 1970s! I somehow knew most of my university course was too superficial, but I didn't know why 🤔
To leave out the critical role played by Montague Norman from the Bank of England and Benjamin Strong of the NY Fed who together with Helmut Schacht led the establishment and initial functioning of the BIS seems a huge oversight. Especially as the US with the UK at its heel has completely dominated the management of the bank from day one..
Could it be because this doesn't fit well with your overarching narrative?
But surely it takes no great leap of the imagination or insight to perceive clearly enough that the European Community has always fundamentally been nothing less that the Fourth Reich.
And that this reich has always been steered from Washington and New York. While the consistently domineering and predatory behaviour of the ECB has only ever confirmed its true mission.
This also entirely explains why Europe's 'leaders' have acted like docile lemmings happy enough it seems to lead all their populations off the cliff. While those that survive will be thrown yet again against Russia.. plus ça change....
Anybody studying the constitution of the Union, the treaties and the complete unelected tyrannous control exercised by the European Commission is left in no doubt. Let alone watching the meaningless theatrical farce that is the European Parliament.
Sorry to respond to the fals post but as I said because I can’t updated my substack I’m pressured to search for other ways to communicate…
So I would respond to your post about the AfD
All this anti hype has helped the AfD to get so strong that they now openly claiming that they planning to rule alone all in the sense of democracy…
Let’s be honest all what we are see since Covid is out of an old playbook the Boston FED made for this a special report called pandemics changes cities…
The AfD is a regime change operation for the interest of the US and Israel as Hitler and the Nazi were.
Name characteristics and similarities of the Gestapo, the Stasi, PROMIS and Palantir
Certainly! Here's an overview of the characteristics and similarities among the Gestapo, the Stasi, PROMIS, and Palantir:
Characteristics
Gestapo (Geheime Staatspolizei):
Nazi Germany's secret state police (1933–1945).
Responsible for political repression, espionage, and enforcing Nazi policies.
Operated through surveillance, interrogation, and terror.
Used extensive informant networks.
Known for brutal methods and mass persecution, including the Holocaust.
Stasi (Staatssicherheit):
East German secret police (1950–1990).
Focused on political surveillance, repression, and maintaining communist control.
Maintained an extensive network of informants within East German society.
Conducted surveillance, interrogation, and espionage.
Known for pervasive monitoring and suppression of dissent.
PROMIS (Prosecutor’s Management Information System):
A software originally developed in the 1980s for law enforcement.
Designed for case management, evidence tracking, and information sharing.
Allegedly stolen and used for intelligence and espionage by various actors.
Became associated with clandestine intelligence activities and black ops.
Palantir:
A private technology company specializing in data analytics and integration.
Provides government and commercial clients with tools for surveillance, data analysis, and intelligence.
Known for enabling large-scale data aggregation from multiple sources.
Used by intelligence agencies, law enforcement, and military for tracking and analysis.
Similarities
Focus on Surveillance and Data Gathering: All four entities/programs are involved in collecting, analyzing, or managing information for security or intelligence purposes.
Operational Secrecy: They operate in covert or semi-covert manners, especially the Gestapo, Stasi, and PROMIS.
Control and Repression: The Gestapo and Stasi used their data for political repression and social control; Palantir and PROMIS facilitate information management that can support security operations.
Technological or Systemic Tools: PROMIS and Palantir are software tools or systems designed to handle large amounts of data; the Gestapo and Stasi relied on human networks and informants, but also employed technology of their time.
Impact on Privacy and Civil Liberties: All have been associated with invasive surveillance practices impacting individual rights.
A important factor we haven’t integrated by now is who will live in Greater Israel?
For what reason they need it?
Why they create terror around the world to justify Israel as the only safe haven for the jews when reality shows us otherwise?
I’m sorry to say and I’m sure a shitstorm will hold me accountable but we should realize that not only 9/11 was good for Israel
Report: Netanyahu Says 9/11 Has Been Good for Israel
but it were the Nazis who legitimize Israel as a state for the jews…
As I saw the Clip out of the documentary about the Belfour Declaration I can’t come over the point that Jacob Rothschild says:
Jacob Rothschild, 80, head of the family’s banking dynasty, said the declaration of support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine went through five drafts before finally being penned on 2 November 1917, adding: “It was the greatest event in Jewish life for thousands of years, a miracle… It took 3,000 years to get to this.”
The way it was achieved was extraordinary, he said. “It was the most incredible piece of opportunism. You had an impoverished would-be scientist, Chaim Weizmann, who somehow gets to England, meets a few people, including members of my family, seduces them, he has such charm and conviction, he gets to Balfour, and unbelievably, he persuades Lord Balfour, and Lloyd George, the prime minister, and most of the ministers, that this idea of a national home for Jews should be allowed to take place. I mean it’s so, so unlikely.”
I was shocked and ask myself could it really be that someone worked Since the beginning of our timeline to get to this point…
I read a lot of Holocaust history and so I Stumbles over and over about the claim “Die Judenfrage” “what to do with the jews” so then how could it be that the same question is used by Hitler and the jews themselves?
•At the beginning of this phase, Israel transfers Administrative Authorities and Responsibilities in Gaza to the GREAT Trust under a bilateral US-Israel agreement.
Esc; For what it is worth, I keep coming to the thought that your detailed explanations of what has occurred over many years . . . to bring you to the point of creating this debate; seems not to have also brought you to the point of defining what is your solution. Yes indeed, the price of freedom is, indeed, eternal vigilance; so in which case; what is your solution?
if your intent was to create the conditions for a debate about the way forward; where is it? Yes, looking backwards to the reasons why we are all at this point in time is a great exercise, if all you have in mind was to present the detail of that journey. Yet my instincts tell me you must also have in mind the correct solution; a mindful map of the way forward based upon your experience of what is wrong. So please; point us all towards your thoughts for a future solution.
yes, there is an end objective, and i have along the way proposed changes. but you cannot propose a working solution without understanding the situation in full.
besides, nothing will work without awareness. awareness is key. and awareness needs to be driven by fact.
Thank you. On my part, what I have gleaned from your work is that the system imposed upon us all over the years derived from meetings of minds and conferences, where the series of changes to what was, (as I understand it from the likes of books such as The English Village Community by Frederic Seebohm, or A History of Worcestershire Agriculture and Rural Evolution by R. C. Gaut, or again, The Commoners' New Forest, An outline of the folk history of the New Forest in the county of Southamptom, its peasant pastorial industry and its possibilities). an ancient understanding of enterprise as it developed over the centuries.
You have very clearly set out the facts; surely now we have to bring minds together to develop the necessary changes?
would you prefer to fight an army of ‘volunteers’ driven by an ‘ethical’ mission, or would you prefer to locate the single screw which holds the ‘ethic’-supporting mechanism together?
I am not expecting, nor wish to; fight anyone. This has to be an open debate, or it becomes just another "forced upon" creation by people that refuse any outside input they believe irrelevant. Which is surely the road taken by those that set it all into motion from the outset.
What we need is a funding source on our side; to create the same process, meetings and conferences to allow the debate to properly surface.
Then there is another aspect; we do not want this to take many decades; we need the debate now.
I will be at Lasham Gliding Sat and Sunday, if you are close enough to get there. No Not flying, meeting old friends sat and introducing a new family to the sport Sunday.
"Fascism should be more properly called Corporatism, because it is the merger of state and corporate power." Benito Mussolini, WWII
The cabal has capitalized on the 'dislocation' caused by the C19 lockdown to injection scenario too. I am finding more and more digital control grid bars that were passed or implemented in 2021. The only one that comes to mind immediately is the credit card companys Auto Pay / Auto Renew programs that were implemented without telling customers in 2021. If you don't opt out, when your credit card renews, your new number, expiration date and CVV code will be sold to every merchant processor who is willing to pay for it - without you even knowing. And you are responsible for anything that happens with that card, in spite of the fact that you have no business connection with these merchant processors and their hacked, inferior, beta level systems.
Corporate patronization needs to be stopped in its tracks.
If Keynes had attended, he might have insisted, as Martin Armstrong has pointed out, that unless the member countries' sovereign debts were consolidated into a Eurobond, the whole thing would most surely collapse into sovereign defaults, as is happening now.
ESC as lord of The rings. The writer who binds it all together!
Lawlessness binds it rule in darkness.
The one ring that bound all other 'magical power rings' might be called Technos.
Technologism uses predictive modelling as power to shape, force, mitigate or escape outcomes. Its 'control' operates as rules and filters of limitation.
Esc offers much worldly information on the coordination of different 'functions' that effectively run dark, and would not hold or stand in light. You could say darkness became the standard, by which light was replaced by artifice or 'gaslighting' of an intellectual arrogance.
Have you come across the Russian word Upravleniye in your research? I kept running into as the economic vision which tied to the global education I had documented in my book.
It also transfers to what you laid out here and why the assumption was that the Upravleniye vision was to be implemented globally.
This also fits with another word that kept coming up--Engrenage. The graphic for enmeshed gears to illustrate how a vision is to work and why if you are only familiar with a part or one or two of the gears a non-insider can miss how the whole structure was designed to work together to transform multiple areas.
cant say i have, t/y, will look into it
Fascinating, thank you. Reading your articles is like doing another university degree, but a much better one. This is what they should have been teaching us in my Economics degree in the 1970s! I somehow knew most of my university course was too superficial, but I didn't know why 🤔
To leave out the critical role played by Montague Norman from the Bank of England and Benjamin Strong of the NY Fed who together with Helmut Schacht led the establishment and initial functioning of the BIS seems a huge oversight. Especially as the US with the UK at its heel has completely dominated the management of the bank from day one..
Could it be because this doesn't fit well with your overarching narrative?
But surely it takes no great leap of the imagination or insight to perceive clearly enough that the European Community has always fundamentally been nothing less that the Fourth Reich.
And that this reich has always been steered from Washington and New York. While the consistently domineering and predatory behaviour of the ECB has only ever confirmed its true mission.
This also entirely explains why Europe's 'leaders' have acted like docile lemmings happy enough it seems to lead all their populations off the cliff. While those that survive will be thrown yet again against Russia.. plus ça change....
Anybody studying the constitution of the Union, the treaties and the complete unelected tyrannous control exercised by the European Commission is left in no doubt. Let alone watching the meaningless theatrical farce that is the European Parliament.
Sorry to respond to the fals post but as I said because I can’t updated my substack I’m pressured to search for other ways to communicate…
So I would respond to your post about the AfD
All this anti hype has helped the AfD to get so strong that they now openly claiming that they planning to rule alone all in the sense of democracy…
Let’s be honest all what we are see since Covid is out of an old playbook the Boston FED made for this a special report called pandemics changes cities…
The AfD is a regime change operation for the interest of the US and Israel as Hitler and the Nazi were.
https://www.politico.eu/article/us-steve-bannon-elon-musk-wealth-and-influence-are-weapons-to-advance-maga-aligned-goals-in-europe/
https://x.com/twittschler/status/2075892691024368057
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=I9kWT3oJxUY
https://afdbundestag.de/israelische-geheimdienstlegende-rafi-eitan-unterstuetzt-afd/
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/jeffrey-epstein-brexit-peter-thiel-b2912853.html
https://www.bundestag.de/presse/hib/kurzmeldungen-1161512
https://julimination.wordpress.com/2026/05/11/afd-hintergrundmanner-und-satze-aus-dem-wahlprogramm-die-dich-uberraschen-werden/
Nobody has hear me out about the signs of genocide that showed us exactly that…
https://julimination.wordpress.com/2024/05/12/the-ten-stages-of-genocide/
Name characteristics and similarities of the Gestapo, the Stasi, PROMIS and Palantir
Certainly! Here's an overview of the characteristics and similarities among the Gestapo, the Stasi, PROMIS, and Palantir:
Characteristics
Gestapo (Geheime Staatspolizei):
Nazi Germany's secret state police (1933–1945).
Responsible for political repression, espionage, and enforcing Nazi policies.
Operated through surveillance, interrogation, and terror.
Used extensive informant networks.
Known for brutal methods and mass persecution, including the Holocaust.
Stasi (Staatssicherheit):
East German secret police (1950–1990).
Focused on political surveillance, repression, and maintaining communist control.
Maintained an extensive network of informants within East German society.
Conducted surveillance, interrogation, and espionage.
Known for pervasive monitoring and suppression of dissent.
PROMIS (Prosecutor’s Management Information System):
A software originally developed in the 1980s for law enforcement.
Designed for case management, evidence tracking, and information sharing.
Allegedly stolen and used for intelligence and espionage by various actors.
Became associated with clandestine intelligence activities and black ops.
Palantir:
A private technology company specializing in data analytics and integration.
Provides government and commercial clients with tools for surveillance, data analysis, and intelligence.
Known for enabling large-scale data aggregation from multiple sources.
Used by intelligence agencies, law enforcement, and military for tracking and analysis.
Similarities
Focus on Surveillance and Data Gathering: All four entities/programs are involved in collecting, analyzing, or managing information for security or intelligence purposes.
Operational Secrecy: They operate in covert or semi-covert manners, especially the Gestapo, Stasi, and PROMIS.
Control and Repression: The Gestapo and Stasi used their data for political repression and social control; Palantir and PROMIS facilitate information management that can support security operations.
Technological or Systemic Tools: PROMIS and Palantir are software tools or systems designed to handle large amounts of data; the Gestapo and Stasi relied on human networks and informants, but also employed technology of their time.
Impact on Privacy and Civil Liberties: All have been associated with invasive surveillance practices impacting individual rights.
https://juli2a5i4.substack.com/p/characteristics-and-similarities?r=1pk0jl&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true
Common sense or Uniform stupidity …?
I stand up for right as the government declared war on the right what’s labeled me self as a right
Then I stand up for left as the government declared war on the left and now they tell me I m a terrorists and Groupthink is Common sense
What the most on the right don’t want realize is that palantir and the governments working since the beginning against the right and the left!!!
https://youtube.com/shorts/bdTnCSN3Xf4?si=hyjt356NvTwojHWd
You better wake up before it’s to late!!!
https://youtu.be/hAZ3Ahy6Za8?si=ECqHp1BOkbnuRbjb
A important factor we haven’t integrated by now is who will live in Greater Israel?
For what reason they need it?
Why they create terror around the world to justify Israel as the only safe haven for the jews when reality shows us otherwise?
I’m sorry to say and I’m sure a shitstorm will hold me accountable but we should realize that not only 9/11 was good for Israel
Report: Netanyahu Says 9/11 Has Been Good for Israel
but it were the Nazis who legitimize Israel as a state for the jews…
As I saw the Clip out of the documentary about the Belfour Declaration I can’t come over the point that Jacob Rothschild says:
Jacob Rothschild, 80, head of the family’s banking dynasty, said the declaration of support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine went through five drafts before finally being penned on 2 November 1917, adding: “It was the greatest event in Jewish life for thousands of years, a miracle… It took 3,000 years to get to this.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DsRuB-Qw1b0
The way it was achieved was extraordinary, he said. “It was the most incredible piece of opportunism. You had an impoverished would-be scientist, Chaim Weizmann, who somehow gets to England, meets a few people, including members of my family, seduces them, he has such charm and conviction, he gets to Balfour, and unbelievably, he persuades Lord Balfour, and Lloyd George, the prime minister, and most of the ministers, that this idea of a national home for Jews should be allowed to take place. I mean it’s so, so unlikely.”
I was shocked and ask myself could it really be that someone worked Since the beginning of our timeline to get to this point…
I read a lot of Holocaust history and so I Stumbles over and over about the claim “Die Judenfrage” “what to do with the jews” so then how could it be that the same question is used by Hitler and the jews themselves?
https://substack.com/@jeremyloffredo/note/p-184786929?utm_source=notes-share-action&r=1pk0jl
https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/the-jewish-question
The "Jewish Question" Background Beginning in the 19th century—long before the Nazis took power in 1933
https://israeled.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/1897-The-Jewish-Question-pics.pdf
So is it possible that these people do this to their own people just to justify themselves or religious and Megalomania ideologies?
Why are there acting in the same disgusting way as the Nazis did and building a digital concentration camp into greater israel for there own people???
What history can teach us?
They did it over and over and they did it again…
https://www.washingtonpost.com/documents/f86dd56a-de7f-4943-af4a-84819111b727.pdf
•At the beginning of this phase, Israel transfers Administrative Authorities and Responsibilities in Gaza to the GREAT Trust under a bilateral US-Israel agreement.
https://juli2a5i4.substack.com/p/lovers-of-zion-zionism-and-technocracy?r=1pk0jl
https://julimination.wordpress.com/tder2024/03/02/how-the-u-s-ibm-and-hitler-created-the-worlds-first-technocracy-part-i/
Keynes was too busy chasing boys in Tunisia.
Esc; For what it is worth, I keep coming to the thought that your detailed explanations of what has occurred over many years . . . to bring you to the point of creating this debate; seems not to have also brought you to the point of defining what is your solution. Yes indeed, the price of freedom is, indeed, eternal vigilance; so in which case; what is your solution?
if your intent was to create the conditions for a debate about the way forward; where is it? Yes, looking backwards to the reasons why we are all at this point in time is a great exercise, if all you have in mind was to present the detail of that journey. Yet my instincts tell me you must also have in mind the correct solution; a mindful map of the way forward based upon your experience of what is wrong. So please; point us all towards your thoughts for a future solution.
yes, there is an end objective, and i have along the way proposed changes. but you cannot propose a working solution without understanding the situation in full.
besides, nothing will work without awareness. awareness is key. and awareness needs to be driven by fact.
Thank you. On my part, what I have gleaned from your work is that the system imposed upon us all over the years derived from meetings of minds and conferences, where the series of changes to what was, (as I understand it from the likes of books such as The English Village Community by Frederic Seebohm, or A History of Worcestershire Agriculture and Rural Evolution by R. C. Gaut, or again, The Commoners' New Forest, An outline of the folk history of the New Forest in the county of Southamptom, its peasant pastorial industry and its possibilities). an ancient understanding of enterprise as it developed over the centuries.
You have very clearly set out the facts; surely now we have to bring minds together to develop the necessary changes?
well, it’s a matter of strategy, really.
would you prefer to fight an army of ‘volunteers’ driven by an ‘ethical’ mission, or would you prefer to locate the single screw which holds the ‘ethic’-supporting mechanism together?
I am not expecting, nor wish to; fight anyone. This has to be an open debate, or it becomes just another "forced upon" creation by people that refuse any outside input they believe irrelevant. Which is surely the road taken by those that set it all into motion from the outset.
What we need is a funding source on our side; to create the same process, meetings and conferences to allow the debate to properly surface.
Then there is another aspect; we do not want this to take many decades; we need the debate now.
i wasn't speaking of 'fighting' in a physical sense.
> What we need is a funding source on our side
hah, yeah, that's a major issue. there's far more funding on the side of those who seek to push through this system, for obvious reason.
I will be at Lasham Gliding Sat and Sunday, if you are close enough to get there. No Not flying, meeting old friends sat and introducing a new family to the sport Sunday.
i wasn't speaking of 'fighting' in a physical sense.; Nor was I!
A small, but well managed PR wise conference might be the answer to funding.
"Fascism should be more properly called Corporatism, because it is the merger of state and corporate power." Benito Mussolini, WWII
The cabal has capitalized on the 'dislocation' caused by the C19 lockdown to injection scenario too. I am finding more and more digital control grid bars that were passed or implemented in 2021. The only one that comes to mind immediately is the credit card companys Auto Pay / Auto Renew programs that were implemented without telling customers in 2021. If you don't opt out, when your credit card renews, your new number, expiration date and CVV code will be sold to every merchant processor who is willing to pay for it - without you even knowing. And you are responsible for anything that happens with that card, in spite of the fact that you have no business connection with these merchant processors and their hacked, inferior, beta level systems.
Corporate patronization needs to be stopped in its tracks.
If Keynes had attended, he might have insisted, as Martin Armstrong has pointed out, that unless the member countries' sovereign debts were consolidated into a Eurobond, the whole thing would most surely collapse into sovereign defaults, as is happening now.
keynes supported the framework. his only objection was that it wasn’t the uk carrying it out.
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-man-who-history-forgot?utm_source=publication-search
yeah, even he missed it. he was great a Versailles
he didn't miss it. he supported it.
he didn't point out the main flaw. that is the point I am making, esc
he didn't think it was a flaw. he thought it was a great idea. that's sourced via LSE's archives if you visit the link.
He failed to identify the flaw. I don't care if he thought it was a great idea.