36 Comments
User's avatar
60Gigahertz2's avatar

Perfect timing you have Esc Key.

I have been educating on The Going Direct Reset since 2021. I didn't read The Great Taking until last year and it was the catalyst for me. I've done a lot of research that supported what David Rogers Webb said.

Beyond the Great Taking, we have The Globalist Purge (Archive.org; 3 part series). Other substacks have been discussing the mass population control and logistical infrastructure arrangements commentors have seen.

The hit piece/psyop "Sovereign" by Universal Studios lies from end to end about the Sovereign Citizen movement in the USA. People here want OUT, and are trying very hard to figure out how to do it. The so called Silent Majority in the USA is now having kids outside of the system, not enrolling them in Social Security, schools, etc. No greedy, murderous pediatricians killing their newborns with SIDS for a few more shekels. One of the Sovereign Citizen participants told me that the DOJ has declared the Sovereign Citizen movement to be the #1 terrorist organization... That an entire, grossly inaccurate, big budget movie was made about it seems to support that, but I have to verify.

The cognitive dissonance introduced by the billionare controlled US administration laying claim to Greenland and Canada is MASSIVE. Nobody (with an intact and fully functioning brain) in the USA wants to impinge on any other country's sovereignty. Nobody on any side.

esc's avatar

it's not really the billionaire class, that's my point. sure, some are crooks. in fact, many are.

all roads lead to central banks, and i've documented that from 4 angles already. everyone else is a useful idiot, and most don't even realise.

60Gigahertz2's avatar

Help us find out who ultimately controls the Central Banks. Who tells Augustin Carsten's what to say? Who decides that psychopath Larry Fink will be the next frontman for the WEF?

Remember Ronald Bernard's revelations about the satanic managers at the BIS? and how he was jailed on invented tax charges..., and eventually handed a copy of Ridders Van Nu to describe the commercial controls in place in Europe that he could not change or impact? (English version on Scribd).

Part 1 How Mr. Bernard got into elite financial mgmt

https://rumble.com/v2rwsj6-ronald-bernard-the-invitation-dutch-with-subs.html

Part 2 - The Global Financial Pyramid - 8500 people

https://rumble.com/v2sglrm-ronald-bernard-pyramid-of-financial-power-dutch-with-subs.html

I still have this list from the Herland Report:

The Rothschilds Families of Paris and London (the controllers; $400 – $500 Trillion immeasurable net worth)

The Israel Moses Seif Family of Rome (Vatican?)

The Lazard Family of Paris (control the European Union/European Central Bank)

The Warburg Family of Hamburg

The Kuhn Loebs of New York Family

The Goldman Sachs Family (Wall Street controllers)

The Rockefeller Family (Eugenicist architects of global de-population)

The Lehmans Family

********************

The Federal Reserve Cartel – Eight Families own the USA #BIS, IMF, World Bank

By The Herland Report and posted by 2nd Smartest Guy in the World // February 02, 2023 // The privately and ½ European-owned, parasitic Federal Reserve Bank is one giant conflict of interest/central planning scam...

A Black Sheep's avatar

Eustace Mullins came to the same conclusions in his book The Secrets of the Federal Reserve, in which he displays charts connecting the Fed and its member banks to the families of Rothschild, Warburg, Rockefeller and the others.

The Secrets of the Federal Reserve. Eustace Mullins. Bankers Research Institute. Staunton, VA. p.179

60Gigahertz2's avatar

I have his book but I haven't read it yet! Thank you for the citation.

Brien's avatar

I recently read The Great Taking and this article really brings it into focus - much more clear and succinct. Thank You. After reading The Great Taking I asked ChatGPT whether the thesis of the book was accurate. The answer was emphatically No, only securities that have been contractually and specifically committed as collateral(ie, debt collateral) would be subject to any type of “clearing sweep” after an insolvency. Chat pointed to the FDIC as protective of ordinary depositors but admitted the reserve limitation(1-2%). Chat clearly showed its programming limitations and inability to think.

So they have done the same thing to our money that they did to our bodies during Covid(and they are still doing). Legal legerdemain, secrecy and emergency engineering allow the powers that be to do whatever they want to us, all in violation of our rights and against all principles of democratic government, due process and Constituituonal law. We must wake up and shake our brain fog or it will very soon be too late.

esc's avatar

when you ask an AI "is this accurate", add "in context of POSIWID".

Brien's avatar

I did! See conversation below. Very interesting

https://chatgpt.com/share/6973bb34-19d4-8005-bebe-4d6cc30ce3ce

esc's avatar

Yup. POSIWID is essentially telling AI to behave like a machine and discard alleged ‘values’

It’s essentially ‘AI God Mode’.

Brien's avatar

In case you’re interested, I continued the thread with ChatGPT and got into quite the debate.

https://chatgpt.com/c/6973cf8b-b73c-832a-83c4-7c784db13807

Petra Kehr's avatar

I mainly use Grok, mostly for financial clarifications. But unintendedly I got into a heated debate (.-)) about health issues which made the LLM walk many a mile from its first statement. In the end I would say I pushed the needle 80 % to the other side. But yes its clear as Muddy water that they are highly premedicated with the "right" POV.

Moonspinner's avatar

Is there some sort of "expiration date" for chatgpt links? I received this message:

Unable to load conversation 6973cf8b-b73c-832a-83c4-7c784db13807

A Black Sheep's avatar

Do you find what is causing the brain fog is more aimed at (or also targets) Conative Capacity (Willpower & Agency)?

Brien's avatar

Yes of course, although I do think the brain fog is real and has been clinically identified as a modern phenomenon, sometimes attributed to the Covid jabs. And it is the jabbed and boosted in particular that just want to move on from all of this. They want it to be history. As for cognitive capacity, that applies to the details like Dr. Yeadon’s posts.

Carsten Christensen's avatar

Thank You for the extensive writing!

Everything is commercial, even Daesh, the terrrorist group is registrered in the Uniform Commercial Code - see World reset Newsletter on substack - I will publish the documents shortly, in case readers have not looked it up.

Kind regards

Carsten Christensen

Thumbnail Green's avatar

At the risk of sounding like a dick. I was singing and rapping in 2021 'now we have bail ins -steal our cash. Stacking up firewood made my dash'

Larry Fink and the rest of them are thieves and liars or the POSIWID is incorrect. The system accumulates and steals and that is its point.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mmAhPm8deMs&pp=ygUTTW9jayB0aGUgc2V0dXAgc29uZw%3D%3D

esc's avatar

who provides financing for Vanguard, State Streeet and BlackRock?

forget the official explanations. no-one grows that large withone something blowing up on occasion.

rather, the three are progressively buying up the economy, and nothing ever appears to go wrong. they're a front for the federal reserve.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-fed-blackrock-idUSKCN24U377/

J R's avatar

> who provides financing for Vanguard, State Streeet and BlackRock?

My understanding is that they all essentially own each other. It’s circular. But someone controls them still.

esc's avatar

you have powell quite literally stating that BlackRock is just their agent. you have press releases, a whole range of them, speaking of the triage working in various capacity for the government and the fed.

they are agents of the fed, and their balance sheet alone should make that explicit.

fozzydabear's avatar

We do. We buy shares of their funds which correlate to fractional shares of any number of companies. But the voting rights for those share don't pass through when you buy shares in an ETF, they stay with the companies that run the funds. Virtually every US company has one or more of these three as a top shareholder.

esc's avatar

they havent existed since 2009.

they're fronts for the Federal Reserve. now go check out the Global Interdependence Center hosting the Declaration on Interdependence. the Henry Commager one from 1976, calling for 'a new world order', and which incidentally speaks of globalised monetary policy

oh yeah, and the GIC was funded through Rockefeller funding, and their website is hosted by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-declaration-of-interdependence?utm_source=publication-search

esc's avatar
Jan 23Edited

courtesy of their own website

https://www.interdependence.org/about/history/

wayback still hosts the declaration over here

'TWO CENTURIES AGO our forefathers brought forth a new nation; now we must join with others to bring forth a new world order... WE AFFIRM that the economy of all nations is a seamless web, and that no one nation can any longer effectively maintain its processes of production and monetary systems without recognizing the necessity for collaborative regulation by international authorities.'

https://web.archive.org/web/20220526011620/https://www.interdependence.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/declaration-of-interdependence.pdf

the GIC is over here - scroll down to see the Philly Fed hosting it

https://www.interdependence.org/college-of-central-bankers/

Thumbnail Green's avatar

Holy shit. What a find!

esc's avatar
Jan 23Edited

whats quite remarkable is that there was a united nations "convocation of interdependence" in 1976.

now go search for that on the web. it's essentially memory holed completely.

and that's in spite of kurt waldheim (un gen sec) being involved.

https://search.archives.un.org/uploads/r/united-nations-archives/d/4/5/d45514752a743aded2cd4dd71259a2bc0edfa943a18de56659c239e1fe4dfa51/S-0972-0011-12-00001.pdf

Rainbow Roxy's avatar

Thanks for writing this, it realy clarifies a lot. The point about 'your deposit is a loan to the bank' is a fundamental shift in perspective, and the idea of transactions settling 'instantly (and irreversibly)' makes you wonder what human-level oversight can even exist anymore.

Petra Kehr's avatar

I learned this in 2010 and still am in the process of diving deeper and get a grip. The content here is outstanding IMO. I checked D.R. Webbs pdf in early 24 and verified his sources so this made sense to me but the additional input here is extraordinary.

Tatika Suisse's avatar

Do you have any thoughts as to how Switzerland will fare (Webb only makes one reference to it specifically)? Could the Swiss franc remain a safe haven asset in this mess?

Dr Mike Yeadon's avatar

I just reread the book today.

He states that the objective is to leave no safe havens.

Everything that is held by an intermediary is subject to being seized, legally, as collateral.

Plenty of things you might not expect too are covered in this way.

Petra Kehr's avatar

We still have most of our cash in CHF and on swiss accounts. But honestly I´m no longer very trusting in Swiss jurisdiction. Considering what sinister corporations and entities they house and with what kind of extreme liability wavers/levels of immunity........

fozzydabear's avatar

I have the same question I had after Webb's piece. Does owning shares in a company through DRS(Direct Registraition System) offer any sort of protection over buying those shares via a brokerage? Or is just the fact it's an electronic system that you don't control mean that you'll end up in the same boat as everyone else, waiting in line with a claim after it's already been taken?

Fink just stated everything has to be put on one blockchain to "prevent fraud". What he describes isn't something that requires a blockchain. It's simply a global ownership database and neglects to say who will have permission to change it. I guarantee it won't be done in anyway similar to how bitcoin's consensus mechanism works.

Petra Kehr's avatar

"Or is just the fact it's an electronic system that you don't control mean that you'll end up in the same boat as everyone else"

That´s my conclusion as each and any of the "shares" is just a vector to a virtual point in one of those Clearing Houses. Nothing specified imo.

MoreMore's avatar

Instead of the CBDC we now got the Genius and Clarity Act, to tokenize everything, including your assets and your country, to keep the debt enslavement ponzi scheme going.

Where CBDCs had some checks and balances, albeit rather worthless, any other digital currency will lack any form of oversight, handing over any sovereignty left to the devil.

Banking as we (in the west) know it, the biggest, most destructive, though easy to resolve, psychological operation in history. Abolish the Fed.

PaPa's avatar

Thank you. I'm a user of AlterAI https://alter.systems/about I recently ask the following: Will AlterAI provide a short explanation on why July 27, 1694 - The founding of the Bank of England, had such a critical impact on Western societies?

Encourage all to do the same.

Kaylene Emery's avatar

Blessings and appreciation from Sydney Australia.