Sorry I haven't touched base in a while Esc. Some feedback.
Firstly, I wholeheartedly concur with your scorched Earth view of Jeffrey Sachs. He is blatantly a globalist plant and whilst I could pretend it "boggles the mind" why he gets screen time, the answer is obvious; the media outlets covering him are just the old mainstream media pretending to be 'new' and 'alternative'.
Secondly, a lot of your articles contain great work and excellent research, but I cannot endorse or repost them much to my frustration because it often contains that one horrible bane I refuse to normalise: ChatGPT.
As someone who does a lot of problem solving, I was using the early versions of GPT as a behind-the-scenes beta test during their private limited access beta in 2020 (I still don't know how I got in), so whilst I'm no field expert, I think my viewpoint perhaps counts maybe for something.
ChatGPT can write literal made-up trash nonsense, and should not ever be relied upon in any article or published field of research (unless said article is an assessment of ChatGPT). It is one thing to use it for your own personal "rubber duck" behind the scenes to aid discovery, it is another to cite the damn thing.
I will admit the fallacy of using it a number of times previously, but what I used back then (GPT 3 with an open doors policy) and what it is now (ChatGPT with a crap ton of globalist propaganda) are wildly different things.
DoorlessCarp's articles boasts that they're "ChatGPT free" and I've been seriously considering asking them if I can steal their image, but I feel like it implies all articles without the logo aren't "ChatGPT free". But their logo makes me think; I always cheer when I see it. Score a point for humanity in the revolt against machines!
I mean you're free to use ChatGPT but I've generally got a strong rule against reposting/liking that sort of thing. Your research is excellent without it!
Sorry I haven't touched base in a while Esc. Some feedback.
Firstly, I wholeheartedly concur with your scorched Earth view of Jeffrey Sachs. He is blatantly a globalist plant and whilst I could pretend it "boggles the mind" why he gets screen time, the answer is obvious; the media outlets covering him are just the old mainstream media pretending to be 'new' and 'alternative'.
Secondly, a lot of your articles contain great work and excellent research, but I cannot endorse or repost them much to my frustration because it often contains that one horrible bane I refuse to normalise: ChatGPT.
As someone who does a lot of problem solving, I was using the early versions of GPT as a behind-the-scenes beta test during their private limited access beta in 2020 (I still don't know how I got in), so whilst I'm no field expert, I think my viewpoint perhaps counts maybe for something.
ChatGPT can write literal made-up trash nonsense, and should not ever be relied upon in any article or published field of research (unless said article is an assessment of ChatGPT). It is one thing to use it for your own personal "rubber duck" behind the scenes to aid discovery, it is another to cite the damn thing.
I will admit the fallacy of using it a number of times previously, but what I used back then (GPT 3 with an open doors policy) and what it is now (ChatGPT with a crap ton of globalist propaganda) are wildly different things.
DoorlessCarp's articles boasts that they're "ChatGPT free" and I've been seriously considering asking them if I can steal their image, but I feel like it implies all articles without the logo aren't "ChatGPT free". But their logo makes me think; I always cheer when I see it. Score a point for humanity in the revolt against machines!
I mean you're free to use ChatGPT but I've generally got a strong rule against reposting/liking that sort of thing. Your research is excellent without it!
Virtue speak from self delusional aspiring despots