The way to maneuvre initiatives about unnoticed in diplomatic, international affairs is through the use of abstract, opaque, seemingly meaningless language.
Thank you. I noticed this phrase in the local council Code Of Conduct for Councillors- in the first few paragraphs of the first page.
I doubt many alledged servants in local govern / ment know exactly what this term means, and extremely unlikely obviously that the constituents being subjected to these assaults are aware either. No consent on any level, least of all informed consent. They pretend they have manufactured consent with voting theatre, and the apathetic express barely a whimper
It's also worth highlighting UDHR Article 29, section 3 shown above, which negates all of the so-called "human rights" enumerated previously, reducing them to mere revocable privileges:
So much for the "freedom of thought" and "freedom of speech" for anyone who dares to challenge the deceptive "purposes and principles" of the UN organization, or the agenda of its billionaire backers.
Brother, you are so right over the target, yes, the UN needs to strip the classical definition of human rights from the negative western framework to the positive Eastern, or collectivist framework
Thank you. I noticed this phrase in the local council Code Of Conduct for Councillors- in the first few paragraphs of the first page.
I doubt many alledged servants in local govern / ment know exactly what this term means, and extremely unlikely obviously that the constituents being subjected to these assaults are aware either. No consent on any level, least of all informed consent. They pretend they have manufactured consent with voting theatre, and the apathetic express barely a whimper
I'm going to politely decline to normalise ChatGPT usage (I really, really must publish that article exposing how flawed the damn thing is).
It's also worth highlighting UDHR Article 29, section 3 shown above, which negates all of the so-called "human rights" enumerated previously, reducing them to mere revocable privileges:
UDHR 29.3: "These rights and freedoms may IN NO CASE be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations." un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/
So much for the "freedom of thought" and "freedom of speech" for anyone who dares to challenge the deceptive "purposes and principles" of the UN organization, or the agenda of its billionaire backers.
Brother, you are so right over the target, yes, the UN needs to strip the classical definition of human rights from the negative western framework to the positive Eastern, or collectivist framework
https://open.substack.com/pub/andrewcorner/p/an-honest-dialogue-with-a-marxist?r=b7juy&utm_medium=ios
the united nations needs to be relocated to the mariana trench. it's a cesspool of corruption and literally nothing but.
don't forget the 'mystics' that are underneath it all