The British monarchy has been a shareholder in the Bank of England since it was chartered.
So, the King, or Queen, allows money to be borrowed for the British wars, and every other thing, and then hold the taxpayers accountable for the perpetual interest that milks the tax-slaves for generations to come. Here's the first instance of the BoE robbing the taxpayers over generations, which has become the model for the globalized Central Banks Cartel.
"The first loan of £1.2 million made by the Bank of England to King William III in
1694 to finance the war against France was finally repaid in 1994. The outstanding balance of £11,015,100—which included the original loan and subsequent additions—remained on the Bank's balance sheet for 300 years until it was repaid upon the Bank's tercentenary."
Actually considering the English "Financial Revolution" and the Act of Settlement, I understand why you are saying "it's still not the royal family, it's still rothschild" - but when you look at all the intersections, e.g. the British monarchy's original investments in the Bank of England, all of the colonial era multinationals, right up to the multinationals today, what they became was a financial-monarchial empire that controls not just the central banks, banking, the international monetary system, and all the multinationals, but also the religious institutions and secret societies. - they are one gigantic parasitic tribe. all on the same page.
p.s. Well done on writing on Terra Carta - the remaking of the Magna Carta. You've got it behind your paywall so I couldn't read it. But I am aware of this issue. The symbol makes me want to vomit. The Crown, which represents the right to rule all of the planet, and then Nature-People-Planet, indicating the order that they control us, and rape, pillage, and plunder it all. We need a retort to this - the Human Carta, People, Nature and Planet.
*Alas, when we're the unseatbelted passengers in taxis driven by clownish kangaroos, accidents and unnecessary collateral damage will occur😳😩😱 .
*Evidently, 99,9+ of global citizens are completely ignorant about economic and financial matters and therefore fast asleep at the wheel🛌 🛌 💤 💤 .
*Hopping mad decarbonised nutjob kangaroos like the delusional Michael Jacobs🥴 idiotically fart out hot air imaginary beLIEfs that carbon-emitting industrial nations have detrimental impacts on climate and weather...and so many heads in the clouds and well-paid dummies falsely beLIEve this climate GOBSHITE🗣️💩🙉 to be real.
*The bigger the LIE, the easier it is for gormless fools to be washed, rinsed and hung out to get wet again HOODWINKED.
*Those who reveal the thermodynamic (1st & 2nd Laws)and Gas Law truths that would quickly blow this NewAgeReligion climate idiocy out of the proverbial water are insanely silenced by the tongue-cutters and policed by useful idiot thought-controllers😡👹 :((
Stakeholders is not an evil word. It includes everyone who has a taxable interest in an enterprise or environment. It's a much better term than shareholder in companies that are by law mandated to put profit over people. Stakeholders are employees, customers, suppliers, communities, environment, plus shareholders. The reason Klaus Egghead Schwab always used the term was because he knows we are too dumb to exercise stakeholder rights, and so they get bundled up and assigned to administrators who make the decisions for us. But our voice matters.
'Stakeholders', like countless words before it, has been commandeered to mean something that it doesn't, in the same way that you just commandeered 'shareholder' and then misrepresented it.
You are not a 'stakeholder' simply because you exist and interact with an entity. Your level of 'stake' aligns not only with what you are recompensed for your efforts, or what you CHOOSE to consume, but for the level of RISK that you take for that entity's failure.
Employees lose their jobs. Customers lose nothing other than potential future consumption. Suppliers, communities and the environment lose nothing that other actors don't step in and replace.
Shareholders lose EVERYTHING.
They have more at STAKE. Therefore, their rewards are rightfully greater.
So ‘everything’ is just fake fiat currency, especially when, by law of super-capitalism, enterprises must maximise profit above human dignity, and jobs and communities mean nothing? People and families and communities mean nothing though their work and labour and ideas go into feeding the machines invested in by shareholders? So the only people who should have a stake in anything are the people who donate flat pieces of paper that most people consider as God into an enterprise? Ok, sure, that makes sense. You are correct. I retract my statement.
also, it's not about the 'billionaires'. sure, lots of those are corrupt. this is about the system itself, and that system will just replace one billionaire for another.
Excellent write-up.
Thanks for removing the paywall.
The British monarchy has been a shareholder in the Bank of England since it was chartered.
So, the King, or Queen, allows money to be borrowed for the British wars, and every other thing, and then hold the taxpayers accountable for the perpetual interest that milks the tax-slaves for generations to come. Here's the first instance of the BoE robbing the taxpayers over generations, which has become the model for the globalized Central Banks Cartel.
"The first loan of £1.2 million made by the Bank of England to King William III in
1694 to finance the war against France was finally repaid in 1994. The outstanding balance of £11,015,100—which included the original loan and subsequent additions—remained on the Bank's balance sheet for 300 years until it was repaid upon the Bank's tercentenary."
it's still not the royal family. it's still rothschild.
the royal family has essentially no powers left. they were progressively stripped.
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/international-government?utm_source=publication-search
Actually considering the English "Financial Revolution" and the Act of Settlement, I understand why you are saying "it's still not the royal family, it's still rothschild" - but when you look at all the intersections, e.g. the British monarchy's original investments in the Bank of England, all of the colonial era multinationals, right up to the multinationals today, what they became was a financial-monarchial empire that controls not just the central banks, banking, the international monetary system, and all the multinationals, but also the religious institutions and secret societies. - they are one gigantic parasitic tribe. all on the same page.
p.s. Well done on writing on Terra Carta - the remaking of the Magna Carta. You've got it behind your paywall so I couldn't read it. But I am aware of this issue. The symbol makes me want to vomit. The Crown, which represents the right to rule all of the planet, and then Nature-People-Planet, indicating the order that they control us, and rape, pillage, and plunder it all. We need a retort to this - the Human Carta, People, Nature and Planet.
*Alas, when we're the unseatbelted passengers in taxis driven by clownish kangaroos, accidents and unnecessary collateral damage will occur😳😩😱 .
*Evidently, 99,9+ of global citizens are completely ignorant about economic and financial matters and therefore fast asleep at the wheel🛌 🛌 💤 💤 .
*Hopping mad decarbonised nutjob kangaroos like the delusional Michael Jacobs🥴 idiotically fart out hot air imaginary beLIEfs that carbon-emitting industrial nations have detrimental impacts on climate and weather...and so many heads in the clouds and well-paid dummies falsely beLIEve this climate GOBSHITE🗣️💩🙉 to be real.
*The bigger the LIE, the easier it is for gormless fools to be washed, rinsed and hung out to get wet again HOODWINKED.
*Those who reveal the thermodynamic (1st & 2nd Laws)and Gas Law truths that would quickly blow this NewAgeReligion climate idiocy out of the proverbial water are insanely silenced by the tongue-cutters and policed by useful idiot thought-controllers😡👹 :((
*Welcome To The MACHINE🥺 .
Bonne continuation,
CJY🇫🇷
Stakeholders is not an evil word. It includes everyone who has a taxable interest in an enterprise or environment. It's a much better term than shareholder in companies that are by law mandated to put profit over people. Stakeholders are employees, customers, suppliers, communities, environment, plus shareholders. The reason Klaus Egghead Schwab always used the term was because he knows we are too dumb to exercise stakeholder rights, and so they get bundled up and assigned to administrators who make the decisions for us. But our voice matters.
'Stakeholders', like countless words before it, has been commandeered to mean something that it doesn't, in the same way that you just commandeered 'shareholder' and then misrepresented it.
You are not a 'stakeholder' simply because you exist and interact with an entity. Your level of 'stake' aligns not only with what you are recompensed for your efforts, or what you CHOOSE to consume, but for the level of RISK that you take for that entity's failure.
Employees lose their jobs. Customers lose nothing other than potential future consumption. Suppliers, communities and the environment lose nothing that other actors don't step in and replace.
Shareholders lose EVERYTHING.
They have more at STAKE. Therefore, their rewards are rightfully greater.
So ‘everything’ is just fake fiat currency, especially when, by law of super-capitalism, enterprises must maximise profit above human dignity, and jobs and communities mean nothing? People and families and communities mean nothing though their work and labour and ideas go into feeding the machines invested in by shareholders? So the only people who should have a stake in anything are the people who donate flat pieces of paper that most people consider as God into an enterprise? Ok, sure, that makes sense. You are correct. I retract my statement.
who votes for the 'stakeholders'?
who selects them, and for what purpose?
when are they 'iterated'?
what does 'inclusive' mean in this context?
also, it's not about the 'billionaires'. sure, lots of those are corrupt. this is about the system itself, and that system will just replace one billionaire for another.
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-stakeholder-selection-process?utm_source=publication-search
Dude, I said you were correct. You won. I have to go to my job and feed my family. Have a good day.
Dude, do you need my permission to leave this conversation?