When it comes to the United Nations, you can count on Aesopian language being the rule as opposed to the exception. And their term ‘Dignity’ might well be the very worst in a catalogue chock full of disasters. Let’s qualify this because I receive a lot of replies on Twitter relating to textbook definitions, and these quite simply do not apply - and that’s the core idea behind ‘
Liberal-fascism: rule by a corporatist oligarchy, behind a false front of liberal democracy and "human rights".
U.N. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, section 29.3: "These 'rights' and 'freedoms' may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations..."
Liberal-fascism: rule by a corporatist oligarchy, behind a false front of liberal democracy and "human rights".
U.N. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, section 29.3: "These 'rights' and 'freedoms' may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations..."
un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
Nothing dignified about killing.
When you see everything as something to be brutally solved with a hammer, you treat everything as nails to be smashed into the woodwork.
They've gone from seeking cures for terrible diseases... to execution of the poor.
Yet to read this other than a quick skim. but looks worth the time. So thanks, I look forward to this read.
On the subject of words and their choice one jumped out at me in that first blue image. they used the word "equality"...
Most of these documents and headines use "equity" which is not the same thing at all, though I am sure most/many folk would read it to mean equality.
So please forgive me if I also jumped in and missed a point you made. I will find out tomorrow when I properly read the piece.
Thanks again!