They always play their silly games. Because you’re not allowed to know what they’re up to. Consequently, should they seek to enable carbon credit trading through technology, intimately coupled with CBDCs, you can count on their terminology differing.
Yes, of course the Bank for International Settlements1 is to be found, once you recognise the terminology. Instead of ‘carbon credits’, they simply renamed them ‘migration outcome interests’, and et voila. But there are a few other things in this report which stand out, so let’s dive in -
‘Two new projects were introduced in 2023. Project Pyxtrial aims to enable the systemic monitoring of the asset backing of stablecoins. It will investigate various technological tools that may help supervisors and regulators to build policy frameworks based on integrated data‘
This so obviously points to some GEOSS2 derivative. Global surveillance. One of their most recent initiatives is GBIOS3, which couples the Convention on Biological Diversity with ‘indicators’ courtesy of the Global Biodiversity Framework Aichi targets, supplied through data courtesy of the GEO BON4 derivative, GBIOS.
And that includes live satellite feeds as well, for the record, and no - I’m not kidding.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to The price of freedom is eternal vigilance. to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.