Their plans are not progressing smoothly at all. How can they expect to announce a "climate emergency" requiring energy lockdowns whilst simultaneously building huge energy guzzling data (surveillance) centres?
This incongruity reveals shoddy planning that is frankly inexplicable for such clever types.
Their systems are purely abstract, but cannot convince in the real world. Sooner or later real people will refuse to implement this. All these systems need human compliance and this is wearing thin as they are seen for what they are - totalitarianism.
I would like to agree with your comment, but “real people” are doing next to nothing about the accumulating controls. The globalists neutered their capacity to defy through bad philosophy beginning decades ago, and through the accumulated body of everyday compliance. I fear you give “real people” far too much credit.
Isn't the same playbook being used on mainstreaming the "Noahide Laws"??????? That could be the final stone in the building...? And it seems to be advancing fast, with Trump recommending everyone observe Shabbat and with Israel new Capital punishment for Palestinians, don't known if already in force. (Typical feature is two sets of rules for Jews and non Jews.) Sanhedrin courts!? Have you heard about them being established? Also, idolatry is, or can be!!, punished with decapitation. Question of old vs new covenant. Outlawing the new covenant. When you then observe certain specific tendencies in the Catholic church. Against those factions that adhere to pre-Vatican II Catholicism, and practice intercession with Saints and with Mary who especially has very very recently been more or less outlawed by Rome. They effectively steer towards compliance with the noahide laws. The purpose of a system being what it does... I am bringing this to your attention for its structural similarity and for the effect it will have, if implemented unhindered, on enforcement of new world order. This is not about whether I am, or you are, or should be, Roman Catholic, don't misunderstand please. Look up stopnoahide dot ORG (dot org not com as I first wrote).
Excellent overview. The patterns are consistent and highly visible once illuminated as brilliantly done here. Your work is a great service. Thank you for this tireless effort to inform. (Unless of course you are a tentacle of the beast tasked with "revelation of the method" for the legal purpose of liability shielding.) (Kidding..., I think :-)
There can be a tendency to believe such a system is a vast, all-powerful and inevitable juggernaut, unstoppable by individual men. But every worldly power has its weaknesses. With your deep understanding of "the system" you might profitably turn your attention to analyzing its weaknesses. What would SunTzu advise in confronting such an enemy? What can any one man do in the face of such a threat? Interesting questions. Thanks again.
Here's a shot, with the remark that the political and social order at the time of Sun Tzu is not comparable to the current globalist system. Moreover, the technological means were extremely limited.
Sun Tzu warned that successful military operations rely heavily on the autonomy of the general on the ground. He famously stated that a ruler (or head of state) should not interfere with military capacity. Totalitarian systems, by centralizing all decisions and micromanaging from the top, create the "danger of a sovereign (elite)" trying to command without understanding shifting realities.
Totalitarian regimes demand total loyalty and blind adherence to authority. Sun Tzu explicitly warned against this, noting that rigid, unquestioning obedience in conflict can lead to disaster. He considered it the mark of a poor leader and stressed that followers must develop a critical mind to act adaptively and intelligently for the collective good.
Totalitarianism aims to control every aspect of a society or organization. Sun Tzu’s philosophy dictates that "supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting". Forcing a populace into absolute submission without offering them a way forward or a voice often backfires, as cornered opponents or citizens will exert their full, ferocious strength to fight back.
Whatever control system or systems is aligned as the social order, (of all spectra or facets of such order) it needs give enough room to live - or freedom of being to live a human life.
King Midas met a dead end - it isn't about 'gold' as such but about possession and control.
I see many cultural or psychic strands converging to a tipping point - not the tipping points projected by models devised for manipulating minds - but the capacity to tolerate fear of pain of loss as the price for living.
The attempt to mask over fear, pain and loss, is also the intent to 'socialize' it as repackaged debt-conflict - sole via 'narratives' of guilting manipulation masking in thescience as a 'moral arbiter'.
The usurp of life and living is an insanity given protection and support - as a mutually agreed framework of dissociating from wholeness or Intimacy of being.
The dependency of the 'mind' runs a form of 'intel inside' that effectively structures, frames and shapes thought and response.
All the functions sketched out by Esc operate as the mind of interpretation or judgement. We are sharing a focus in a 'world' made by judgement - that runs an 'Overton Window' of currently permitted acceptance. There are different levels of such because it all operates at a speed that (what we take as) our mind cannot possibly see or catch up with.
Having developed the mind that learns and adapts a world we then suffer as if imposed order or external causation, let it serve functional wholeness - rather than the egoic script of judgements set over and apart from a life that then reflects what we gave as the measure of our receiving.
Discernment is within life and the living - wisdom cannot be mechanically achieved or stored. Cultural streams of wisdom are held in life and the living, by giving and receiving or sharing at the level of Spirit - within the primary or unadulterated qualities of life - gratitude for being, recognition of worth, connection and synchronicity as an intimacy of being - to which 'doing' is an expression - not a cause or a means.
Practising discernment in the moment at hand, and in the 'evils of the day thereof' is both a call to Spirit or Truth - and the Call of Spirit. Giving and receiving are one in truth, but a split mind has developed 'getting' as a private 'gain of function' - set on false claims as a-tempt to boost a sense of self-lack that is built into the split-mind by judgement.
On this level it is a game that contains its own logic of inversion and reversal to wind up death over life - or to a game that is not worth the candle (the light of awareness and attention) we give it. Within the game is set by the first rule of the game - that it is not a game! Fallacies of self-contradiction have to be taken seriously as a basis from which countermeasures define a shifting sense of self and world in conflict for existence itself - repackaged as a body of rules, limits and exclusions. As with chess, the rules can be developed to expand the scope of the game. But conflicting rulesets represent pain or conflict in the mind - that compartmentalises to keep the conflict while masking and distancing as conditional status or permission to run.
While we are 'in the body' or focus of the world, we are necessarily in action - and choosing not to act is also an action or result of thought, perceptual interpretation as response. There is a transcendence of body-as-masking-limit within 'body-as-transparency-to-feeling-life. But this is of the active purpose - not the conditioned response. The idea of giving to God what is due unto God is the basis from which to live from wholeness - while giving unto Caesar what is due unto Caesar. This is always a discernment - not a rule. When we live from a connected sense of life and living we do not give worth-ship and false with-ness to externalised or surrogate authority. This is of a covenant between you and God - not a claim in the world for your person. Being true to your self holds a peace that cannot be manufactured. Holding to truth while a storm of conflicting illusion seeks your attention or allegiance is of a persistence of valuing or truly appreciating.
This runs counter to all we have learned - but does not attack it.
Learning the 'world' was a significant learning goal and achievement that became 'habitual' or automatic. But its foundation is not only false, but lacking substance.
Those who feel the call to war must discard or hate what seems like weakness. Tolkien sketched that out well. But insofar as we are obliged to engage in defence of life and freedom in living - let it be from an integrality of being - and not a reaction in like kind to the evils we think to oppose.
The Germans would use the noun 'Verständnis' in this context, which means understanding, insight, or feeling.
"Practicing discernment in the moment at hand, and in the 'evils of the day thereof' is both a call to Spirit or Truth - and the Call of Spirit. Giving and receiving are one in truth, but a split mind has developed 'getting' as a private 'gain of function' - set on false claims as a-tempt to boost a sense of self-lack that is built into the split-mind by judgment."
This is reminiscent of of Nietzsche and Carl Jung's analysis of his philosophy.
Jung recognized Nietzsche's 'superior perception', but also his lack of 'spiritual ventilation'.
Nietzsche remained too stuck in his mind (constructs) – which led to his Übermensch concept, and was most likely also the cause of his insanity.
You refer to alignment, which seems to be a key to all facets of life.
"King Midas met a dead end – it isn't about 'gold' as such but about possession and control."
This observation is meaningful.
Materialism in a social sense (~ attitude to life) can be (roughly) divided into 2 aspects:
- Possession as a means to control (power), and/or to achieve and display prestige.
- An intrinsic connection with materials and the things that can be made from them.
The first primarily concerns extraction (of resources, freedom, etc.) and is destructive, because it is counterproductive. The second relates to creation and is therefore constructive.
The concept of 'attachment' is linked to this. What does a person truly need and when does someone become possessed by 'something' > money/power/fame/items such as real estate, cars, boats, planes, jewelry, etc.?
In other words: what does a person really need to enjoy life, without sliding into decadence/opulence?
The second part of your reply brings the Taoist concept of Wu-Wei to mind.
The world seems to be collectively heading towards a kind of Omega point - to quote Pierre Teilhard de Chardin (referred to by Esc).
Regarding judgment and dualism, the symbolism of the Caduceus is recalled, of which each visual element carries its own metaphorical meaning:
- The Twin Serpents: Represent duality, balance, and the transformation of opposing forces.
- The Wings: Symbolize speed, protection, and the ability to traverse between the mortal and divine realms.
- The Central Staff: Represents authority and a central axis of support.
In his articles, Esc often refers to the Marxist, elitist, totalitarian, instrumental 'common good' that is applied across various domains, carrying (misleading) ethical labels.
This unnatural body of thought is ultimately subordinate to the universal 'greater good' that follows the path of least resistance.
The derivative of communism is…. Been here much longer than communism itself. Looking for a political messiah as usual for domination. Oh the esoteric info is unbelievable. Programmed to receive. Decades in the making.
And that's why so many in the tech and finance industry are being laid off, and AI is being trained to replace them. They intend for the machines to rule us.
Their plans are not progressing smoothly at all. How can they expect to announce a "climate emergency" requiring energy lockdowns whilst simultaneously building huge energy guzzling data (surveillance) centres?
This incongruity reveals shoddy planning that is frankly inexplicable for such clever types.
Their systems are purely abstract, but cannot convince in the real world. Sooner or later real people will refuse to implement this. All these systems need human compliance and this is wearing thin as they are seen for what they are - totalitarianism.
Human non compliance requires human understanding and loss of trust in centralised systems, authority and institutions. We live in idiocracy movie.
I would like to agree with your comment, but “real people” are doing next to nothing about the accumulating controls. The globalists neutered their capacity to defy through bad philosophy beginning decades ago, and through the accumulated body of everyday compliance. I fear you give “real people” far too much credit.
Isn't the same playbook being used on mainstreaming the "Noahide Laws"??????? That could be the final stone in the building...? And it seems to be advancing fast, with Trump recommending everyone observe Shabbat and with Israel new Capital punishment for Palestinians, don't known if already in force. (Typical feature is two sets of rules for Jews and non Jews.) Sanhedrin courts!? Have you heard about them being established? Also, idolatry is, or can be!!, punished with decapitation. Question of old vs new covenant. Outlawing the new covenant. When you then observe certain specific tendencies in the Catholic church. Against those factions that adhere to pre-Vatican II Catholicism, and practice intercession with Saints and with Mary who especially has very very recently been more or less outlawed by Rome. They effectively steer towards compliance with the noahide laws. The purpose of a system being what it does... I am bringing this to your attention for its structural similarity and for the effect it will have, if implemented unhindered, on enforcement of new world order. This is not about whether I am, or you are, or should be, Roman Catholic, don't misunderstand please. Look up stopnoahide dot ORG (dot org not com as I first wrote).
I just read the thing. It's the very definition of insanity.
I tried to visit the website, but it says its blocked for a "phishing" attempt. I did add the "." before com. Are you able to pull the website up?
Sorry, I realize it's org not com. I'll correct that in the comment.
Thank you. I'm only a few minutes into reading and this is terrifying...it does connect some dots.
👍
Btw the website I mention in the comment is at dot org not dot com.
For those unfamiliar with my song in 2021 about exactly this malfeasance ...https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mmAhPm8deMs&pp=ygUTTW9jayB0aGUgc2V0dXAgc29uZw%3D%3D
Thank you all for sharing that too Esc. Please also see/share our tips https://old.bitchute.com/video/jsHTV8JdIlAt/
also here
https://odysee.com/@tidbitsfortruth:2?view=content
and here
https://old.bitchute.com/channel/NBu3vOs8kXFY/
It's all a science thing.
Thank you.
https://abrv.in/cpoK
🦖 👀
Excellent overview. The patterns are consistent and highly visible once illuminated as brilliantly done here. Your work is a great service. Thank you for this tireless effort to inform. (Unless of course you are a tentacle of the beast tasked with "revelation of the method" for the legal purpose of liability shielding.) (Kidding..., I think :-)
There can be a tendency to believe such a system is a vast, all-powerful and inevitable juggernaut, unstoppable by individual men. But every worldly power has its weaknesses. With your deep understanding of "the system" you might profitably turn your attention to analyzing its weaknesses. What would SunTzu advise in confronting such an enemy? What can any one man do in the face of such a threat? Interesting questions. Thanks again.
Here's a shot, with the remark that the political and social order at the time of Sun Tzu is not comparable to the current globalist system. Moreover, the technological means were extremely limited.
Sun Tzu warned that successful military operations rely heavily on the autonomy of the general on the ground. He famously stated that a ruler (or head of state) should not interfere with military capacity. Totalitarian systems, by centralizing all decisions and micromanaging from the top, create the "danger of a sovereign (elite)" trying to command without understanding shifting realities.
Totalitarian regimes demand total loyalty and blind adherence to authority. Sun Tzu explicitly warned against this, noting that rigid, unquestioning obedience in conflict can lead to disaster. He considered it the mark of a poor leader and stressed that followers must develop a critical mind to act adaptively and intelligently for the collective good.
Totalitarianism aims to control every aspect of a society or organization. Sun Tzu’s philosophy dictates that "supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting". Forcing a populace into absolute submission without offering them a way forward or a voice often backfires, as cornered opponents or citizens will exert their full, ferocious strength to fight back.
Whatever control system or systems is aligned as the social order, (of all spectra or facets of such order) it needs give enough room to live - or freedom of being to live a human life.
King Midas met a dead end - it isn't about 'gold' as such but about possession and control.
I see many cultural or psychic strands converging to a tipping point - not the tipping points projected by models devised for manipulating minds - but the capacity to tolerate fear of pain of loss as the price for living.
The attempt to mask over fear, pain and loss, is also the intent to 'socialize' it as repackaged debt-conflict - sole via 'narratives' of guilting manipulation masking in thescience as a 'moral arbiter'.
The usurp of life and living is an insanity given protection and support - as a mutually agreed framework of dissociating from wholeness or Intimacy of being.
The dependency of the 'mind' runs a form of 'intel inside' that effectively structures, frames and shapes thought and response.
All the functions sketched out by Esc operate as the mind of interpretation or judgement. We are sharing a focus in a 'world' made by judgement - that runs an 'Overton Window' of currently permitted acceptance. There are different levels of such because it all operates at a speed that (what we take as) our mind cannot possibly see or catch up with.
Having developed the mind that learns and adapts a world we then suffer as if imposed order or external causation, let it serve functional wholeness - rather than the egoic script of judgements set over and apart from a life that then reflects what we gave as the measure of our receiving.
Discernment is within life and the living - wisdom cannot be mechanically achieved or stored. Cultural streams of wisdom are held in life and the living, by giving and receiving or sharing at the level of Spirit - within the primary or unadulterated qualities of life - gratitude for being, recognition of worth, connection and synchronicity as an intimacy of being - to which 'doing' is an expression - not a cause or a means.
Practising discernment in the moment at hand, and in the 'evils of the day thereof' is both a call to Spirit or Truth - and the Call of Spirit. Giving and receiving are one in truth, but a split mind has developed 'getting' as a private 'gain of function' - set on false claims as a-tempt to boost a sense of self-lack that is built into the split-mind by judgement.
On this level it is a game that contains its own logic of inversion and reversal to wind up death over life - or to a game that is not worth the candle (the light of awareness and attention) we give it. Within the game is set by the first rule of the game - that it is not a game! Fallacies of self-contradiction have to be taken seriously as a basis from which countermeasures define a shifting sense of self and world in conflict for existence itself - repackaged as a body of rules, limits and exclusions. As with chess, the rules can be developed to expand the scope of the game. But conflicting rulesets represent pain or conflict in the mind - that compartmentalises to keep the conflict while masking and distancing as conditional status or permission to run.
While we are 'in the body' or focus of the world, we are necessarily in action - and choosing not to act is also an action or result of thought, perceptual interpretation as response. There is a transcendence of body-as-masking-limit within 'body-as-transparency-to-feeling-life. But this is of the active purpose - not the conditioned response. The idea of giving to God what is due unto God is the basis from which to live from wholeness - while giving unto Caesar what is due unto Caesar. This is always a discernment - not a rule. When we live from a connected sense of life and living we do not give worth-ship and false with-ness to externalised or surrogate authority. This is of a covenant between you and God - not a claim in the world for your person. Being true to your self holds a peace that cannot be manufactured. Holding to truth while a storm of conflicting illusion seeks your attention or allegiance is of a persistence of valuing or truly appreciating.
This runs counter to all we have learned - but does not attack it.
Learning the 'world' was a significant learning goal and achievement that became 'habitual' or automatic. But its foundation is not only false, but lacking substance.
Those who feel the call to war must discard or hate what seems like weakness. Tolkien sketched that out well. But insofar as we are obliged to engage in defence of life and freedom in living - let it be from an integrality of being - and not a reaction in like kind to the evils we think to oppose.
Thank you for this extensive reply.
The Germans would use the noun 'Verständnis' in this context, which means understanding, insight, or feeling.
"Practicing discernment in the moment at hand, and in the 'evils of the day thereof' is both a call to Spirit or Truth - and the Call of Spirit. Giving and receiving are one in truth, but a split mind has developed 'getting' as a private 'gain of function' - set on false claims as a-tempt to boost a sense of self-lack that is built into the split-mind by judgment."
This is reminiscent of of Nietzsche and Carl Jung's analysis of his philosophy.
Jung recognized Nietzsche's 'superior perception', but also his lack of 'spiritual ventilation'.
Nietzsche remained too stuck in his mind (constructs) – which led to his Übermensch concept, and was most likely also the cause of his insanity.
You refer to alignment, which seems to be a key to all facets of life.
"King Midas met a dead end – it isn't about 'gold' as such but about possession and control."
This observation is meaningful.
Materialism in a social sense (~ attitude to life) can be (roughly) divided into 2 aspects:
- Possession as a means to control (power), and/or to achieve and display prestige.
- An intrinsic connection with materials and the things that can be made from them.
The first primarily concerns extraction (of resources, freedom, etc.) and is destructive, because it is counterproductive. The second relates to creation and is therefore constructive.
The concept of 'attachment' is linked to this. What does a person truly need and when does someone become possessed by 'something' > money/power/fame/items such as real estate, cars, boats, planes, jewelry, etc.?
In other words: what does a person really need to enjoy life, without sliding into decadence/opulence?
The second part of your reply brings the Taoist concept of Wu-Wei to mind.
The world seems to be collectively heading towards a kind of Omega point - to quote Pierre Teilhard de Chardin (referred to by Esc).
Regarding judgment and dualism, the symbolism of the Caduceus is recalled, of which each visual element carries its own metaphorical meaning:
- The Twin Serpents: Represent duality, balance, and the transformation of opposing forces.
- The Wings: Symbolize speed, protection, and the ability to traverse between the mortal and divine realms.
- The Central Staff: Represents authority and a central axis of support.
In his articles, Esc often refers to the Marxist, elitist, totalitarian, instrumental 'common good' that is applied across various domains, carrying (misleading) ethical labels.
This unnatural body of thought is ultimately subordinate to the universal 'greater good' that follows the path of least resistance.
stopnoahide.com doesn't exist.
Sorry, it's org not com. I corrected it in my comment.
The derivative of communism is…. Been here much longer than communism itself. Looking for a political messiah as usual for domination. Oh the esoteric info is unbelievable. Programmed to receive. Decades in the making.
Great analysis. Yes, Covid began with the question, “Don’t you care about your comrade?” Very Communistic. But I still think the Democrats did it.
What’s the qualifier for making someone a sovereign? Financial wealth?
And that's why so many in the tech and finance industry are being laid off, and AI is being trained to replace them. They intend for the machines to rule us.