One Health - Part 2: Rockefeller, NTI & CORDS
Let’s have a look at the ‘Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter Humanitarian Award‘. Because in the context of One Health, it’s a remarkable list of recipients.
It’s not just Farrar in 2019, Piot in 2017, but Tedros received the award in 2011, Foege in 2008, and John D Rockefeller in 2001. Although those deserve attention for sure, the three I wish to highlight are David Satcher in 1999 - who we will hear about in a minute, Ted Turner in 2000… and the final we’ll leave for now.
And here’s the brochure which goes with the award, and it’s fairly obvious why he received said, donating $1bn to the United Nations Foundation. I mean, it's a great document - you can see Gates buying a future award in realtime, with Turner being entirely on board with that.
Oh and there’s that 2 billion people quote. Quite important, that?
And Gates? Yeah he bought…, sorry, won it in 2002.
-
Here’s the first part of this very, very long story. The reason why it’s so long, is because it’s been decades in the making.
-
In general, the early 2000s really was a notorious time, when it comes to the founding of controversial organisations. In addition to the Global Fund (2002) discussed in part 1, we also had a range of other organisations spring to life, all of which contributed to the utterly undemocratic rollout of One Health.
One of which is the Nuclear Threat Initiative, founded by Ted Turner, who is probably best known for founding CNN, and as we saw, co-founding the United Nations Foundation.
Via Wayback, let’s have a look at the composition of the NTI in the early days. This capture is from January 5, 2002.
Right off the bat, we have the draft-charter-for-world-governance pushing Collegium International’s Amartya Sen. And in this regard, pay attention to them stating that this could have taken place in 2009 already, which of course was the year of the alleged Swine Flu pandemic.
We also have Jessica Mathews, who in addition to formerly acting in the capacity of director for the NSC, served on the editorial board of Washington Post (and who did she truly serve in this capacity?), is also part of the Bilderberg steering committee!
I could carry on in this regard, but there’s something more relevant. NTI also employed two particular individuals, specifically, Mark Smolinski and Margaret Hamburg.
Smolinski was the main author of the 2000 report on ‘Healthy People 2010’ which sneaked in the first ‘Social Determinants of Health’ reference, which per 2008 report is nothing short of dystopian surveillance Marxism. Following his stint with the NTI, he went on to found ‘Ending Pandemics’, which is very strangely sponsored by Tides, a social justice organisation.
Per article in Penta, He also became senior advisor to US Surgeon General, David Satcher, who also contributed to the 2008 WHO report on SDoH. And you know what Satcher also contributed to? He also wrote the foreword for ‘Healthy People 2010’!
And on the advisory board of Ending Pandemics? Margaret Hamburg, of course. More on her in a minute, we’re not yet done with Smolinski, because while the WHO report was released in 2008, another initiative got going in the wake of Lehmann Brothers collapsing, and stock markets unravelling.
And do you know who else partook in that initiative? Google.
And let there be no doubt - One Health was integrated in those programs, even UC Davis agrees, and I quote ‘PREDICT initiated One Health Surveillance‘.
That webpage furthermore quickly outlines the PREDICT-based workforce. That, today, is called the ‘One Health Workforce Academy’ and I covered that previously -
That article furthermore digs into the social science aspect of it all, introduced as the 3rd pillar in the 2005 NSC paper in part 1; a module of the One Health training relates to what in short is nothing but unbridled manipulation. It’s not the worst bit in this regard, however, that’s to come.
PREDICT and PREVENT are part of two efforts by USAID, EPT-1 and EPT-2, which you can find here and here.
EPT-1 furthermore had a very interesting range of partners;
PREDICT: UC/Davis, EcoHealth Alliance, Metabiota, WCS, Columbia/Harvard
PREVENT: FHI 360, Metabiota...
Metabiota, of course, Hunter Biden was involved with.
FHI360 is the family health initative, founded at Chapel Hill, to conduct reproductive health research. Funded by NIH, USAID, Rockefeller, … and - very strangely - Hess, which is about energy.
WCS is the Wildlife Conservation Society, who have a special place in all of this, as the 2004 Manhattan Principles were penned by the following three individuals -
They furthermore also output this peach in 2020, in a true example of bridge building between disciplines, or as in this case, narratives; ‘One Health Surveillance Approach’ and ‘Build Back Better’ - very impressively in the same report!
EcoHealth Alliance we should all be aware of in relation to the grants which Fauci attempted to keep under wraps. But in the regard of Manhattan Principles and One Health, William Karesh furthermore plays another role. Yup, he is currently an executive VP for EcoHealth Alliance - in fact, he also worked with AG Huff per documents in the zip file Huff was so callous to release to the world.
Incidentally, I still do not understand why both Alex Berenson and Bret Weinstein failed to spot the excessive references to ‘One Health’ and ‘surveillance’ in those documents. They were littered all over the place!
Via USAID, here’s a document on EPT-2. It covers a range of the same topics we’ve seen already; One Health workforce, biosurveillance, a global database, … but it also loops in defence agencies… like those found in the Georgetown whitepaper in 2020, perchance (part 1).
But Smolinski also - and I quote - ‘led the development of a regional disease surveillance system linking Israel, Jordan, and the Palestinian Authority‘. This effort was called MECIDS, and this can be found here, along with article from lifestyles magazine.
Among supporters we naturally find NTI, the World Bank (always), USAID (another prerequisite), and… though the website cuts it off… CORDS. Really not sure if that’s intentional or not, and I tell you why. Here’s their website., and more specifically, their history.
Founded in 2007 by Rockefeller and the NTI, and it’s explicitly about surveillance, laboratory capacity, collaboration, data sharing, regional infectious disease surveillance networks, and it works in support of - among others - Skoll and Fondation Merieux.
If you don’t know that name, here’s why they are relevant, per wiki: ‘In 2015, the FM participated in the donation by the French government of CIRI's Biosafety Level 4 expertise to the Wuhan Institute of Virology‘.
Nice! We’re not quite done with Mérieux just yet, more on them later.
So that initiative was launched in 2007, where are we today? Here. They, essentially, have surveillances centres rolled out already, in Europe, Africa, and Asia.
Here are three of their more interesting initiatives. APEIR was established in 2006 with a focus on surveillance, SACIDS collaborates with UCL and the LSHTM, and the SECID… specifically mentions ‘integration of all existing surveillance systems and using a One Health Surveillance Approach’.
And this can easily be confirmed. Here’s a CDC grant worth $1.45m integrating Albanian surveillance systems under the One Health Surveillance Approach.
Quickly back to CORDS, they also currently run a project which commenced in 2014, using ‘Mobile Technology for One Health Surveillance’.
-
Margaret Hamburg, in turn, contributed to the 2005 DHS report covered in part 1, which looped in the response component, which included responsibilities from global, to national, local, and individual. The final component, of course, is ‘behaviour change’, which also loops in the One Health Workforce Academy Modules, the link can be located above.
But Hamburg also contributed to this 2003 report… along with Smolinski, and Joshua Lederberg.
This, somewhat, smells like the Lederberg passing the baton moment, because his name doesn’t appear much after this report, which is understandable as he would have been 77 at the time. He passed at the age of 83, in early 2008.
Hamburg stayed with the Nuclear Threat Initiative for over 8 years, after which, she joined… the FDA, as a commissioner of food… and drugs.
The 2003 report, for the record, mentioned antibiotics an impressive 174 times, which must similarly have impressed Rockefeller, because in 2005 she was elected to the Rockefeller board of trustees.
As for her time spent with the FDA, well, in 2016 she was named in a racketeering lawsuit involving Johnson&Joshson, and a Wall St hedge fund.
-
I’m sure you’ve noticed Rockefeller rather a lot by now. Hamburg, Lederberg, CORDS, and a colossal amount of grants in this regard, which all tell a story of their own.
Peter Piot is also directly connected, as is his wife, Heidi Larson, through the ‘Communication for Social Change Consortium’ - another Rockefeller initiative. There’s that social science again.
But we also find Denise Gray-Felder, and Bruce Gellin - both Rockefeller. But wait, where did that come from?
Here. The Centre for Strategic Studies’ High-level Panel on Vaccine Confidence and Misinformation, which amazingly in 2020 recommended…
Let’s have another look at participants, shall we?
It’s Gray-Felder and Gellin from above… but also Heidi Larson (also above), Margaret Hamburg (also above), and ‘misinformation’ specialist, Renee DiResta. It really is an incredible amount of coincidences all around, no?
I have covered Heidi Larson a LOT over on Twitter, less so on substack. She was part of the 3-D Commission, which also was sponsored by Rockefeller. She furthermore suggested vaccinating against Long Covid with Peter Hotez, who also has a long track record in terms of One Health.
And she, in December 2019, at the WHO Global Vaccine Summit stated - and I quote ‘we are all dependent upon vaccines now‘. I personally spent ages tracking down the specific video, and the time mark - to establish that it’s legit.
And it is. Final talk, 1:29:50.
But I don’t want to cover Heidi Larson in detail just yet. The point of this is just to establish that there’s a core group of people whose names you repeatedly see as contributors to key papers, and they revolve around the Rockefeller Foundation.
And I haven’t yet even looped in Margaret Chan.
-
So to sum up all of this information -
The Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter association hands out humanitarian awards, and these have with very high level of precision, been handed out to people relevant to the One Health narrative.
One of said recipients was Ted Turner, who founded the Nuclear Threat Initiative.
The NTI employed Mark Smolinski who contributed to very early ‘Social Determinants of Health’ work, worked on One Health-based PREDICT and PREVENT, along with Google. He furthermore founded Ending Pandemics, and worked with David Satcher, who himself contributed to WHO’s 2008 SDoH report, and the ‘Healthy People 2010’ report in 2000.
Margaret Hamburg, similarly worked with the NTI, but furthermore contributed to a range of papers, including one co-authored by Smolinski and Lederberg. She furthermore was elected a Rockefeller trustee in 2005.
The NTI, working with Rockefeller and Fondation Merieux, launched CORDS in 2007, who specialise in surveillance, and already are fully up and running in EMEA regions.
And these characters tend to show up repeatedly along with other Rockefeller associates, including work involving Heidi Larson, sponsored by… yes, Rockefeller.
-
… and there are still much, much more to cover. See you in part 3.