So at the end of the day this is a spiritual construct. Teleological Participation.
There are only two spiritual sources, two designs, one real and one an imitation - The Church of God and The Church of Man. The head of the Church of God is Jesus Christ. The head of the Church of Man is, ultimately, Satan, the father of lies. There is, however, only one design, the real and the counterfeit of the real. The real design is based on truth and beauty. The counterfeit design, like all counterfeits, looks very much like the real design however it contains many guises, many manifestations. They are designed to complicate, to confuse, to conceal, to deceive. The purpose of the counterfeit is to destroy the real, something which it has repeatedly failed to do and will ultimately fail to do.
God's Spirit or the Creative extends through the 'Son' - which is like unto the Father in all but this: the Son does not create the Son. The Father is First - not in time - but beneath all temporal appearances (Eternally or Timeless).
What we think does not leave our mind, but the belief we have left the mind of our Creator is the result of thinking unlike God ( ie: lovelessly).
God embraces by extending.
Our minds have learned to separate by projecting.
yet only in concept - never in truth.
That we give reality to fear - give fearful projections power - to block our awareness of love's awareness now.
The wish is the father of the lie.
Wishing is not willing - but can mask as IF.
The wish to love is not love, and can be masked in as a manipulative defence against fear of love, loss of face and control and exposure to invalidity or 'damning guilt' unmasked.
God is not mocked but our awareness of God can be blocked by masking guilted fears.
I don't think the terms I used are necessary to the living discernment of truth, but insofar as you offered the sketch, I joined in like kind.
Innocence of being is an integrality. Not a counterpoint to projected guilt.
Only by evaluating the fruits will you discern the underling seed or root.
Why should anything of this world not be corruptible by distortions of a wish to control. Throw the stone of accusation if you will, but why would your claim stand as the final judgement over all else?
"Thy kingdom come, thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven." Christians have been praying for God's kingdom to come for 2,000 years. The United Nations is Satan's counterfeit kingdom of God, that professes to be the panacea for humanitys existential plight.
The term 'will' here is not temporal in relation to God - Whose Will Is done.
The alignment or covenant with our will is what the prayer calls or offers willingness for.
But I agree that panacea or fake solutions are the device by which to madsk over or repackage relational conflicts -AS IF to have 'scaped them to others and world - or even to concepts of God (made in our image).
Sovereignty already has a definition. Who's willing to let them keep changing the gameboard we perpetually lose on, by perpetually redefining the words we use?
Not me. I'm ready to take away the tongues and fingers they use to redefine things.
I call it "having self-respect". I'm not of a mind to just keep taking abuse like a gimp.
I thought you were finished after "The Architects", Parts 1 and 2? Or, at least -- unless I suddenly interpret English sentences very wrongly -- you were speaking as if there was an end in sight.
You gonna do the thing everyone else does and just endlessly rehash the Problem until the goon squad physically lifts you out of your chair to black-bag you? Not EVER going to move on to discussing Solution with me?
Very well done! I would love to follow all of these links and read this in its entirety, but alas, time is fleeting. I will though at some other point.
The propaganda angle is exceptionally important too, and I believe you would cover this very well. We have all been denied the truth for so long that we wouldn't know what truth is any more. Just on that, I remember back in the 80s I took two undergrad units of Russian history/politics from one of the big sandstone universities. Isn't it strange that not once was Solzhenitsyn mentioned during that time. Given that he had received the Nobel prize for literature more than a decade earlier, one would've thought at least his works would rate a mention for another point of view. Instead, Marxism was peddled as the antidote for the world ills.
So at the end of the day this is a spiritual construct. Teleological Participation.
There are only two spiritual sources, two designs, one real and one an imitation - The Church of God and The Church of Man. The head of the Church of God is Jesus Christ. The head of the Church of Man is, ultimately, Satan, the father of lies. There is, however, only one design, the real and the counterfeit of the real. The real design is based on truth and beauty. The counterfeit design, like all counterfeits, looks very much like the real design however it contains many guises, many manifestations. They are designed to complicate, to confuse, to conceal, to deceive. The purpose of the counterfeit is to destroy the real, something which it has repeatedly failed to do and will ultimately fail to do.
Nothing real is threatened.
Nothing unreal exists.
Herein lies the Peace of God.
(A Course in Miracles)
God's Spirit or the Creative extends through the 'Son' - which is like unto the Father in all but this: the Son does not create the Son. The Father is First - not in time - but beneath all temporal appearances (Eternally or Timeless).
What we think does not leave our mind, but the belief we have left the mind of our Creator is the result of thinking unlike God ( ie: lovelessly).
God embraces by extending.
Our minds have learned to separate by projecting.
yet only in concept - never in truth.
That we give reality to fear - give fearful projections power - to block our awareness of love's awareness now.
The wish is the father of the lie.
Wishing is not willing - but can mask as IF.
The wish to love is not love, and can be masked in as a manipulative defence against fear of love, loss of face and control and exposure to invalidity or 'damning guilt' unmasked.
God is not mocked but our awareness of God can be blocked by masking guilted fears.
I don't think the terms I used are necessary to the living discernment of truth, but insofar as you offered the sketch, I joined in like kind.
Innocence of being is an integrality. Not a counterpoint to projected guilt.
Nope, Christianity, like all "spiritual" religions (search term: Axial Revolution), is just another of the oligarchy's control-scam lies.
You will is done on earth if not in heaven.
You have your reward.
Only by evaluating the fruits will you discern the underling seed or root.
Why should anything of this world not be corruptible by distortions of a wish to control. Throw the stone of accusation if you will, but why would your claim stand as the final judgement over all else?
Are you the king of the castle?
;-)
Is this Binra from Thunderbolts forum! Greetings
Anyone with no profile pic and no posts is almost certainly a shill, and shouldn't talk to me.
Especially if all you have to type is unparseable pseudospiritual bullshit.
Goddamned shame we can't add images to these comments...
Esc, I'm not very educated about all this, but even I can see that you are absolutely brilliant!
"Thy kingdom come, thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven." Christians have been praying for God's kingdom to come for 2,000 years. The United Nations is Satan's counterfeit kingdom of God, that professes to be the panacea for humanitys existential plight.
The term 'will' here is not temporal in relation to God - Whose Will Is done.
The alignment or covenant with our will is what the prayer calls or offers willingness for.
But I agree that panacea or fake solutions are the device by which to madsk over or repackage relational conflicts -AS IF to have 'scaped them to others and world - or even to concepts of God (made in our image).
Sovereignty already has a definition. Who's willing to let them keep changing the gameboard we perpetually lose on, by perpetually redefining the words we use?
Not me. I'm ready to take away the tongues and fingers they use to redefine things.
I call it "having self-respect". I'm not of a mind to just keep taking abuse like a gimp.
"Who's coming with me, man?"
This would have been great ten years or more ago.
I thought you were finished after "The Architects", Parts 1 and 2? Or, at least -- unless I suddenly interpret English sentences very wrongly -- you were speaking as if there was an end in sight.
You gonna do the thing everyone else does and just endlessly rehash the Problem until the goon squad physically lifts you out of your chair to black-bag you? Not EVER going to move on to discussing Solution with me?
Very well done! I would love to follow all of these links and read this in its entirety, but alas, time is fleeting. I will though at some other point.
The propaganda angle is exceptionally important too, and I believe you would cover this very well. We have all been denied the truth for so long that we wouldn't know what truth is any more. Just on that, I remember back in the 80s I took two undergrad units of Russian history/politics from one of the big sandstone universities. Isn't it strange that not once was Solzhenitsyn mentioned during that time. Given that he had received the Nobel prize for literature more than a decade earlier, one would've thought at least his works would rate a mention for another point of view. Instead, Marxism was peddled as the antidote for the world ills.
Time IS fleeting. That's why I recommend:
Stone Age solutions for modern problems.™