7 Comments
User's avatar
Thumbnail Green's avatar

Buy your title if hoped it meant I'm sovereign by not participating within the monetary economy but then I realised... not really possible.

It's more try and survive this theft

currer's avatar

Back to barter, I think! The system is eating its own tail.

Crixcyon's avatar

All designed with depopulation in mind. There is no other purpose for this tyrannical system.

Sofia Petit's avatar

When irreversible execution is a design premise, dispute mechanisms may no longer function primarily as tools for correction, but instead as post-hoc rationales for settled states. This functional shift has structural implications worth examining

thelightpaper's avatar

it might also be the key to its downfall.

'no takey-backs' is not going to work for most people at some point.

if a system is what it does, not what it is designed to do, and it doesn't, then it is going to be abandoned very quickly.

John Day MD's avatar

What will the Supreme Court rule on Trump's tarriffs?

This is an ideal and huge example.