There are only so many hours in a day. It is getting more and more difficult to believe the level of magnitude for all of this for one man. Epstein is starting to look more and more like a fully staffed blackmailing institution, masquerading around as a single cult of personality.
it's not about blackmail. blackmail does not create organisations. blackmail does not design financial products, route sovereign relationships through fourteen foreign ministers, or write currency specifications that predate the BIS programme by eight years.
I know what you mean. He was using the control files he built to coerce (or the Mossad coerced), lower level players/anyone not on board with the highest level strategies.
- First Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court
From founding, folks. From the siting of the White House and the US Treasury right next to each other, sharing a fence line and security today.
Epstein and all we are becoming familiar with is a continuation of what was being designed for the US before the ink was even dry on the US Constitution. Particularly the Bill of Rights. Highly contentious when the first ten amendments were adopted. Those who lost that debate set about finding ways to prevail in a long game. How are they doing?
I know my Bill of Rights no longer exist. Plandemic taught me how foolish and naïve I was to believe in the myth.
Been reading a lot of your essays over the last few weeks and thought about the reason for Noam Chomsky being brought into the fold. Possibly for knowledge on linguistics and advising (knowingly or unknowingly) on how certain use of language can steer certain groups of people. Useful for social Cybernetic feedback and relating to use of Social Causes. Or perhaps Epstein seeking the point of view from someone on the "American left". Maybe just to create noise.
Cass Sunstein, aka, Mr. Samantha Power, is a talented linguist. Schooled in both behavioral psychology and the law. Having occupied some of the highest heights in multiple administrations. Including running OIRA, "the cockpit of government" that coordinated all federal policies within federal agencies and with state and local governments. Established "Nudge" as governance, psychological manipulation of the masses to achieve the goals and agendas of government officials. Many SCOTUS judges, both R's and D's value him, his insights as guidance for their rulings. He now teaches constitutional law at Harvard Law School. Recently he penned, "How To Interpret the Constitution." A guide for how jurists can linguistically twist the governing contract with citizens that protects individual liberty and self-governance into an authoritarian/totalitarian justification for rule by experts based on collectivism:
How War becomes Peace, Ignorance becomes Strength, Freedom becomes Slavery. Orwellian Newspeak. Linguistics. That Marxist professor of Linguistics, Noam Chomsky helped pioneer.
Superb stuff, Esc. In fact, hat's off to you for the best exposition I've seen. The brief reference to John Kluge takes us directly to the assassination of JFK - and the Zapruder film.
The JP Morgan connection does not surprise me. I heard on UK Column that JP Morgan did the investigation of Peter Mandelson for the job of Ambassador to America. Crazy stuff!
Have you looked at the book "The creature from Jekyll Island"? Probably butI haven't seen if you wrote about it. It fits in the context of "representation" that you wrote about. In any case I recently looked at this book and I found that in the first pages, the author lists the participants in that project, including which entities they represent. Compare those participants and entities to today's participants and entities. It's really all working after the same principle. And what Epstein thought out and created the prerequisites for implementing - if a certain group for decades to centuries has really no other personal interest than that, then maybe it's not that outlandish to come to Epstein's financial system ideas, nor that difficult to implement them if you have, as they do, that array of tools like media, education system, health system at your disposal. It's all the less outlandish if you consider that even wanting to number each piece of cattle with a unique id really os already in the bible, the mark of the beast, it's actually a concept that is so basic that it is trivial. Only wanting to apply ot to everyone and everything under the sun requires the left hemisphere gone rogue that this philosopher Iain McGilchrist talks about - I so extremely completely agree with him (https://www.cbc.ca/radio/ideas/neuroscientist-argues-the-left-side-of-our-brains-have-taken-over-our-minds-1.6219688) and, in my opinion, a degree of madness. I also found interesting how it seemed to have spooked Epstein, in the Bannon interview, that the markets had behaved in 2008 as they did. He was totally impressed by that, didn't stop talking about it. I think that was another incentive. Maybe that is obvious. The real difficulty is that you need a degree of psychopathy or at least sociopathy to be able to think certain things and to want to follow through on them. A factor that in my opinion is making the world more dangerous right now is chat bots or ai agents in that their advent creates an environment where sociopathic tendencies in people are no longer checked by those people's need to discuss their ideas with sane people around them, instead they can now bounce them off an ai agent that knows only the sociopathic value system. A real danger lies also in the fact that today, every person can get into bad company and be influenced toward evil by ai agents whereas in the past, only some people were drawn into the sphere of influence of evil characters. In part, I attribute the demeanor of Hegseth to his living in a bubble where his amoral AI agent cheers him on and he loses contact with startled human reactions to his ideas that might give him pause. I am referring to his use of "awesome" in more than one context in the same speech. Did anyone also notice that the speech of the General after He Seth's speech, was blatantly ai drafted? It contained the typical stylistic idiosyncrasies of ai generated texts. Here too, in the past, there was a human speechwriter who had to put the principal's ideas into words. That too was a filter against extremism. Now with AI, there is nothing that attenuates, only reinforcement.
It's the same families, same bank firms, same secret modus operandi. Do look into what Iain M Gilchrist says. The entire cybernetic urge according to him is left brain gone rogue.
“Epstein running one of the world’s biggest banks from the outside “ . Reminded me of my time working in Dept of “Corrective “ Services as an addictions counsellor.
When it became public knowledge that some of the inmates had mobile phones and were running their business from ….the inside .
These days I understand that such things don’t happen without , let’s just call it consent . I know I’m preaching to the converted here but surely …no one is surprised .
I don’t know your work very well Esc . It’s way out of my league but I …hang around the coffee shop in the hope of acclimatising.
well please do, because the system they seek to embed in conditional CBDCs is exactly the same system they embedded in ‘climate finance’ and other ‘impact investing’ objectives
money controlled through a ‘social objective’, which isnt about the social objective itself per Epstein himself
they presently rob largely the west of $300bn/yr through taxpayer funding, and that number is planned to increased to 1.35tn by 2035
that’s your taxes ending in private pockets and it’s taking place right now - and ultimately, the same mechanism will be fused into the CBDC
I read Exhibit 144 and a bunch of the links you list at the end and you are right. But I really had to adjust my thinking to take on the fact that this guy was so incredibly embedded into these organizations through their executives.
I've worked for executives at that level, and at no point could I have ever imagined any of them being that insecure and vulnerable. It is just tough to believe that anyone could work their way up to those positions, practically groveling before a convicted sadistic pedofile. Talk about lost.
What remarkable research. Sadly it’s confirmation of how difficult it is for honest players to win on Wall Street and in international finance. How does an ethical individual compete with a system like that? Thank you for illuminating the bigger picture.
There are only so many hours in a day. It is getting more and more difficult to believe the level of magnitude for all of this for one man. Epstein is starting to look more and more like a fully staffed blackmailing institution, masquerading around as a single cult of personality.
it's not about blackmail. blackmail does not create organisations. blackmail does not design financial products, route sovereign relationships through fourteen foreign ministers, or write currency specifications that predate the BIS programme by eight years.
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/agents-for-the-rothschilds?utm_source=publication-search
I know what you mean. He was using the control files he built to coerce (or the Mossad coerced), lower level players/anyone not on board with the highest level strategies.
"JPM approach as it represents to them a quasi-US govt arm"
https://i.imgflip.com/adfm34.jpg
"Those who own the country ought to govern it."
- First Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court
From founding, folks. From the siting of the White House and the US Treasury right next to each other, sharing a fence line and security today.
Epstein and all we are becoming familiar with is a continuation of what was being designed for the US before the ink was even dry on the US Constitution. Particularly the Bill of Rights. Highly contentious when the first ten amendments were adopted. Those who lost that debate set about finding ways to prevail in a long game. How are they doing?
I know my Bill of Rights no longer exist. Plandemic taught me how foolish and naïve I was to believe in the myth.
Been reading a lot of your essays over the last few weeks and thought about the reason for Noam Chomsky being brought into the fold. Possibly for knowledge on linguistics and advising (knowingly or unknowingly) on how certain use of language can steer certain groups of people. Useful for social Cybernetic feedback and relating to use of Social Causes. Or perhaps Epstein seeking the point of view from someone on the "American left". Maybe just to create noise.
Universal grammar. That’s the one of Chomsky to note.
Cass Sunstein, aka, Mr. Samantha Power, is a talented linguist. Schooled in both behavioral psychology and the law. Having occupied some of the highest heights in multiple administrations. Including running OIRA, "the cockpit of government" that coordinated all federal policies within federal agencies and with state and local governments. Established "Nudge" as governance, psychological manipulation of the masses to achieve the goals and agendas of government officials. Many SCOTUS judges, both R's and D's value him, his insights as guidance for their rulings. He now teaches constitutional law at Harvard Law School. Recently he penned, "How To Interpret the Constitution." A guide for how jurists can linguistically twist the governing contract with citizens that protects individual liberty and self-governance into an authoritarian/totalitarian justification for rule by experts based on collectivism:
https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/cass-r-sunstein/how-to-interpret-the-constitution/
How War becomes Peace, Ignorance becomes Strength, Freedom becomes Slavery. Orwellian Newspeak. Linguistics. That Marxist professor of Linguistics, Noam Chomsky helped pioneer.
Superb stuff, Esc. In fact, hat's off to you for the best exposition I've seen. The brief reference to John Kluge takes us directly to the assassination of JFK - and the Zapruder film.
The JP Morgan connection does not surprise me. I heard on UK Column that JP Morgan did the investigation of Peter Mandelson for the job of Ambassador to America. Crazy stuff!
Have you looked at the book "The creature from Jekyll Island"? Probably butI haven't seen if you wrote about it. It fits in the context of "representation" that you wrote about. In any case I recently looked at this book and I found that in the first pages, the author lists the participants in that project, including which entities they represent. Compare those participants and entities to today's participants and entities. It's really all working after the same principle. And what Epstein thought out and created the prerequisites for implementing - if a certain group for decades to centuries has really no other personal interest than that, then maybe it's not that outlandish to come to Epstein's financial system ideas, nor that difficult to implement them if you have, as they do, that array of tools like media, education system, health system at your disposal. It's all the less outlandish if you consider that even wanting to number each piece of cattle with a unique id really os already in the bible, the mark of the beast, it's actually a concept that is so basic that it is trivial. Only wanting to apply ot to everyone and everything under the sun requires the left hemisphere gone rogue that this philosopher Iain McGilchrist talks about - I so extremely completely agree with him (https://www.cbc.ca/radio/ideas/neuroscientist-argues-the-left-side-of-our-brains-have-taken-over-our-minds-1.6219688) and, in my opinion, a degree of madness. I also found interesting how it seemed to have spooked Epstein, in the Bannon interview, that the markets had behaved in 2008 as they did. He was totally impressed by that, didn't stop talking about it. I think that was another incentive. Maybe that is obvious. The real difficulty is that you need a degree of psychopathy or at least sociopathy to be able to think certain things and to want to follow through on them. A factor that in my opinion is making the world more dangerous right now is chat bots or ai agents in that their advent creates an environment where sociopathic tendencies in people are no longer checked by those people's need to discuss their ideas with sane people around them, instead they can now bounce them off an ai agent that knows only the sociopathic value system. A real danger lies also in the fact that today, every person can get into bad company and be influenced toward evil by ai agents whereas in the past, only some people were drawn into the sphere of influence of evil characters. In part, I attribute the demeanor of Hegseth to his living in a bubble where his amoral AI agent cheers him on and he loses contact with startled human reactions to his ideas that might give him pause. I am referring to his use of "awesome" in more than one context in the same speech. Did anyone also notice that the speech of the General after He Seth's speech, was blatantly ai drafted? It contained the typical stylistic idiosyncrasies of ai generated texts. Here too, in the past, there was a human speechwriter who had to put the principal's ideas into words. That too was a filter against extremism. Now with AI, there is nothing that attenuates, only reinforcement.
yeah read it a while back, but the Federal Reserve is based on the BoE, and that same system was scaled to become the BIS.
It's the same families, same bank firms, same secret modus operandi. Do look into what Iain M Gilchrist says. The entire cybernetic urge according to him is left brain gone rogue.
“Epstein running one of the world’s biggest banks from the outside “ . Reminded me of my time working in Dept of “Corrective “ Services as an addictions counsellor.
When it became public knowledge that some of the inmates had mobile phones and were running their business from ….the inside .
These days I understand that such things don’t happen without , let’s just call it consent . I know I’m preaching to the converted here but surely …no one is surprised .
I don’t know your work very well Esc . It’s way out of my league but I …hang around the coffee shop in the hope of acclimatising.
well please do, because the system they seek to embed in conditional CBDCs is exactly the same system they embedded in ‘climate finance’ and other ‘impact investing’ objectives
money controlled through a ‘social objective’, which isnt about the social objective itself per Epstein himself
they presently rob largely the west of $300bn/yr through taxpayer funding, and that number is planned to increased to 1.35tn by 2035
that’s your taxes ending in private pockets and it’s taking place right now - and ultimately, the same mechanism will be fused into the CBDC
https://wmo.int/media/news/cop29-ends-compromise-climate-financing
I know .
Thank you.
This is what Whitney Webb has been saying. The blackmail operation was just a tiny part of his activities.
I read Exhibit 144 and a bunch of the links you list at the end and you are right. But I really had to adjust my thinking to take on the fact that this guy was so incredibly embedded into these organizations through their executives.
I've worked for executives at that level, and at no point could I have ever imagined any of them being that insecure and vulnerable. It is just tough to believe that anyone could work their way up to those positions, practically groveling before a convicted sadistic pedofile. Talk about lost.
What remarkable research. Sadly it’s confirmation of how difficult it is for honest players to win on Wall Street and in international finance. How does an ethical individual compete with a system like that? Thank you for illuminating the bigger picture.