These skuzbuckets have the carbon footprint larger than a small country, they then have the audacity to make plans to control reducing the quality of everyone else’s life.
If we shut down all the institutions such as the UN, NATO, EU plus every single other building they utilise to make their punishment plans it would make a huge dent in their decarbonise figures,.
There should also be a life long ban on any single one of them travelling more than 15 minutes from their homes, they made these plans and rules so let them live by them.
Instead we having them prancing around the world peacocking on how only they can save it with this nonsense.
Also they really do live in la la land with this respecting other cultures, I’m am quite happy to do that as long as that culture is sat within its own borders and no good ever comes when you mix people with 50 different cultures into one spot.
They really are happy clappy doolally thinking that the masses will not turn on them, we already have the bitching going on on how one already gets more priorities and freebies than another import and the original taxpayers are paying for this free for all.
I would love to see the little energy graph that’s printed/posted on the UN’s electricity bill. I’d also love to see Jeffrey’s monthly mileage report that displays the amount of carbon he produces, etc. And so on and so forth.
Jeffrey Sachs is also a lifetime member of the globalist Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), which he joined in 1981 immediately after graduating from Harvard.
In the 1990s, Sachs was a key player on the team of "economic advisors", including fellow CFR member and future Harvard president Larry Summers, which guided the looting of Russia following the collpase of the Soviet government. For details, see "The Harvard Boys Do Russia": thenation.com/article/world/harvard-boys-do-russia/
In 2002, Sachs was named director of the "Earth Institute" at Columbia, and also served as director of the "U.N. Millennium Project" which laid the groundwork for the present "sustainable development goals":
"UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan and Administrator of the UN Development Programme (UNDP) Mark Malloch Brown launched the Millennium Project...headed by Professor Jeffrey Sachs..." -- en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Millennium_Project
In 2016, Sachs was named director of the "Center for Sustainable Development" at Columbia: csd.columbia.edu/sachs
Sustainable and sustainability are the two worst words in the English language. I don’t remember hearing them until a couple of years prior to the “Covid psyop “.
Sustainable became the middle management buzzword to drop in meetings by the brown-nosing climbers.
I have lived through so many of these terms and mission statements and synergies and paradigms. Ughhh
he has absolutely not 'awakened' to a thing. he's at the very heart of absolutely everything taking place atm as his/Flanagan's book 'Ethics in Action for Sustainable Development' without the shadow of a doubt is evidence of.
i'd agree with some sentiments - he's said how naïve he was on the lancet's covid origin commission - initially. however, he's also been thrown out of the group think circles claiming a rules based order - at least it is what he has said multiple times in conversations with Napolitano - losing friends, losing speaking opportunities, etc.
i haven't read sachs' book, and am skeptical of the use of doublethink phrases such as sustainable development, but there are hours of conversations he's had w/ napolitano since 2020 on the judging freedom podcast which - to me - demonstrate a complete 180 degree turn on topics such as: covid origin, nordstream sabotage, origin of ukraine war.
... all of which are 'safe' admissions, because they don't interfere with his core task. It's a way for him to build up credit, without affecting his primary objective.
But that Lancet commission alone is an issue, because why were no health professionals assigned? It likely would have been him doing said 'stakeholder selection', so that's a question for Sachs in fact.
fair point - which i agree with (sachs coming around on obvious truths the corporate media calls conspiracy theories)...however have you spoken to any 'blue no matter who' types lately?
have you heard any of them recon with biden's well publicized comments about nordstream before the sabotage indicating they think the CIA (per Seymore Hersh among many others) may have been involved?
i am surrounded by them, no recognition about its disaster for the climate (scam) nor curiosity about it. so for sachs to go on tv and say 'qui bono' + biden said it out loud is an example of him going into group think mob's safe spaces and uttering the ugly truths.
"In recent conflicts, such indirect deaths range from three to 15 times the number of direct deaths. Applying a conservative estimate of four indirect deaths per one direct death9 to the 37 396 deaths reported, it is not implausible to estimate that up to 186 000 or even more deaths could be attributable to the current conflict in Gaza."
for further reference: ‘I’m bored, so I shoot’: The Israeli army’s approval of free-for-all violence in Gaza
OMGOSH‼️ Here I thought David Martin was an informative whistleblower throughout the pandemic! I’m appalled at the level of deceit among ppl in high places. Thank you, for your brave, thorough, articulate reporting. God Bless You‼️‼️💯
legitimately, do not trust anyone. confirm what you can. everyone's corruptible, and everyone can have a bad take on a situation. and, sure, that goes for me as well.
but every time you see one of these celebs, with an apparent phantom career, ask who promoted him/her - and why.
oh hang on, now im confused. this particular article pertains to jeff sachs, but i've written a separate one on david e martin, who i like to call 'margin' as finance types generally only are in it for the money. at least, those i know in finance don't care about much else, and their discussions down the pub don't appear to centre around much but that...
These skuzbuckets have the carbon footprint larger than a small country, they then have the audacity to make plans to control reducing the quality of everyone else’s life.
If we shut down all the institutions such as the UN, NATO, EU plus every single other building they utilise to make their punishment plans it would make a huge dent in their decarbonise figures,.
There should also be a life long ban on any single one of them travelling more than 15 minutes from their homes, they made these plans and rules so let them live by them.
Instead we having them prancing around the world peacocking on how only they can save it with this nonsense.
Also they really do live in la la land with this respecting other cultures, I’m am quite happy to do that as long as that culture is sat within its own borders and no good ever comes when you mix people with 50 different cultures into one spot.
They really are happy clappy doolally thinking that the masses will not turn on them, we already have the bitching going on on how one already gets more priorities and freebies than another import and the original taxpayers are paying for this free for all.
Seriously, show us the receipts, Jeffrey, et al.
I would love to see the little energy graph that’s printed/posted on the UN’s electricity bill. I’d also love to see Jeffrey’s monthly mileage report that displays the amount of carbon he produces, etc. And so on and so forth.
Be the example you wish us to be, Jeffo.
Oh? What is that you say?
Bravo! Well done, excellent analysis, summary and documentation
Of course Bret heart-of-the-Cabal Weinstein is trying to muddy the waters!!!!!!
Malone can’t be far behind.
Jeffry sucks.
Gandhi at least walked the talk. If this guy ever cleaned out the chook poop or pickled the veggies then wombats fly.
What a boring dickhead he is. Lecturing people and TELLING THEM WHAT TO DO. Nay forcing them through policy is to be the hand of the Oligarchs.
Excellent summary.
Jeffrey Sachs is also a lifetime member of the globalist Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), which he joined in 1981 immediately after graduating from Harvard.
In the 1990s, Sachs was a key player on the team of "economic advisors", including fellow CFR member and future Harvard president Larry Summers, which guided the looting of Russia following the collpase of the Soviet government. For details, see "The Harvard Boys Do Russia": thenation.com/article/world/harvard-boys-do-russia/
In 2002, Sachs was named director of the "Earth Institute" at Columbia, and also served as director of the "U.N. Millennium Project" which laid the groundwork for the present "sustainable development goals":
"UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan and Administrator of the UN Development Programme (UNDP) Mark Malloch Brown launched the Millennium Project...headed by Professor Jeffrey Sachs..." -- en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Millennium_Project
In 2016, Sachs was named director of the "Center for Sustainable Development" at Columbia: csd.columbia.edu/sachs
And yet many think Sachs talks a lot of sense re: relations between Russia, NATO, and the US. Go figure
Brett Weinstein was once a beacon. Now he is here to smooth over atrocities, and to allow for more of the same.
You just may be right. I’ve been fooled before, and no doubt will be fooled again.
Yet for a while there, Dark Horse got me through the darkest times of the psyop.
Sustainable and sustainability are the two worst words in the English language. I don’t remember hearing them until a couple of years prior to the “Covid psyop “.
Sustainable became the middle management buzzword to drop in meetings by the brown-nosing climbers.
I have lived through so many of these terms and mission statements and synergies and paradigms. Ughhh
100%. He gives me the creeps, a careerist seeing which way the wind blows.
that is... somewhat... underselling him.
he's at the very heart of this current, ongoing global coup d'etat, so to speak.
You hit the nail on the head. Sachs is an establishment man doing a limited hangout and not calling out the true tyrants. Period.
Sachs is a regular on Andrew napolitanos podcast: judging freedom.
Agree he's a climate alarmist, but finding his 'awakening' and insights on many subjects interesting and informative
he has absolutely not 'awakened' to a thing. he's at the very heart of absolutely everything taking place atm as his/Flanagan's book 'Ethics in Action for Sustainable Development' without the shadow of a doubt is evidence of.
i'd agree with some sentiments - he's said how naïve he was on the lancet's covid origin commission - initially. however, he's also been thrown out of the group think circles claiming a rules based order - at least it is what he has said multiple times in conversations with Napolitano - losing friends, losing speaking opportunities, etc.
i haven't read sachs' book, and am skeptical of the use of doublethink phrases such as sustainable development, but there are hours of conversations he's had w/ napolitano since 2020 on the judging freedom podcast which - to me - demonstrate a complete 180 degree turn on topics such as: covid origin, nordstream sabotage, origin of ukraine war.
big fan of your substack.
search on spotify: "judging freedom sachs" = https://open.spotify.com/search/judging%20freedom%20sachs/podcastAndEpisodes
... all of which are 'safe' admissions, because they don't interfere with his core task. It's a way for him to build up credit, without affecting his primary objective.
But that Lancet commission alone is an issue, because why were no health professionals assigned? It likely would have been him doing said 'stakeholder selection', so that's a question for Sachs in fact.
fair point - which i agree with (sachs coming around on obvious truths the corporate media calls conspiracy theories)...however have you spoken to any 'blue no matter who' types lately?
have you heard any of them recon with biden's well publicized comments about nordstream before the sabotage indicating they think the CIA (per Seymore Hersh among many others) may have been involved?
i am surrounded by them, no recognition about its disaster for the climate (scam) nor curiosity about it. so for sachs to go on tv and say 'qui bono' + biden said it out loud is an example of him going into group think mob's safe spaces and uttering the ugly truths.
he's also called the israel's operations in gaza for what it is - an exercise in ethnic cleansing & genocide ahead of the lancet's publication mentioning there could be as many as 180k dead in gaza. (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(24)01169-3/fulltext)
"In recent conflicts, such indirect deaths range from three to 15 times the number of direct deaths. Applying a conservative estimate of four indirect deaths per one direct death9 to the 37 396 deaths reported, it is not implausible to estimate that up to 186 000 or even more deaths could be attributable to the current conflict in Gaza."
for further reference: ‘I’m bored, so I shoot’: The Israeli army’s approval of free-for-all violence in Gaza
https://www.972mag.com/israeli-soldiers-gaza-firing-regulations/
+
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israel-presses-gaza-offensive-hours-after-deadly-airstrike-tent-camp-2024-07-10/
to be clear: i think your skepticism of sachs is warranted.
thanks for the dialogue.
OMGOSH‼️ Here I thought David Martin was an informative whistleblower throughout the pandemic! I’m appalled at the level of deceit among ppl in high places. Thank you, for your brave, thorough, articulate reporting. God Bless You‼️‼️💯
legitimately, do not trust anyone. confirm what you can. everyone's corruptible, and everyone can have a bad take on a situation. and, sure, that goes for me as well.
but every time you see one of these celebs, with an apparent phantom career, ask who promoted him/her - and why.
Sachs as in Goldman Sachs. Like Budweiser, you’ve said it all…
OMG, what a Sachs of bullsh*t. Do any of his words mean *anything*???
BTW, *The Global Competitiveness Report 2000* was published on January 1, 2000. Makes me wish Y2K predictions would’ve come true, whatever they were.
The CFR have an online membership roster. https://www.cfr.org/membership/roster
Great summary by the way
David E Margin or Martin. You used both names. I’m Confused.
his name is Martin, but he's in finance, hence the play on his name
So this is not Dr. David Martin? I m glad. I thought he was one of the good guys.
... no, it IS David E Martin.
oh hang on, now im confused. this particular article pertains to jeff sachs, but i've written a separate one on david e martin, who i like to call 'margin' as finance types generally only are in it for the money. at least, those i know in finance don't care about much else, and their discussions down the pub don't appear to centre around much but that...
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-patently-flawed-dr-david-e-martin?utm_source=publication-search