This makes me think about C S Lewis's little book, "The Abolition of Man" in which he presciently forsaw the future rise of technocracy (he did not call it that) and described the role that would be occupied by the elite class which he called "the conditioners".
This following bit generated by AI:
Key Points about "The Conditioners":
Manipulation of Human Nature: The conditioners seek to control humanity by shaping values and behaviors, rather than allowing them to develop naturally.
Undermining Morality: Lewis argues that this manipulation ultimately undermines true morality. By imposing artificial values, the conditioners risk erasing the inherent dignity and worth of individuals.
Consequences for Society: The approach of the conditioners can lead to a society where genuine moral understanding is replaced by a superficial adherence to imposed norms, resulting in a loss of authentic human experience.
"The Abolition of Man" written in the 1960's was very prescient about what is going on with increasing intensification today! Worth reading!
Great synopsis of the system of feedback-based control. Since January this year, China has been utilizing "smart contracts" (programmable money) and is boasting at how efficient it is. China is the anti-Hayek, meaning that, while Hayek (and Mises) proved that central planning cannot ever work, Chinese officials want to continue to believe that they will be able to control things.
In farm subsidies and rural social programs, China boasts that 22% of leakage has been removed by programmable funding. It also conducted a test-run of expiring currency, and found that 94% of poor households given money which expires in 30 days spent it in the first 7 days. Because they do not acknowledge the fundamental truth discovered by Hayek and Mises, they are set up to fail.
It would be a benefit to the West if China fails so fast, and so hard, that it sends the signal to not attempt technocratic totalitarianism in the West (even if we are already 80% to that goal).
the west and east compete to implement the BIS framework. it's a struggle over who occupies the tipheret position. the standards are identical.
sure, point to the exceptions, but if you investigate the historical track record, that tends to eventually align regardless.
china didn't begin developing until they joined EMEAP in 1992, a BIS-connected group of central banks. in 1996, china entered the BIS.
it's why i say that 'the multi-polar world order' often touted by Chatham and CFR is an illusion. what they really signal, is that international organisations control the world order from behind the scenes, exactly as leonard s woolf wanted in 1916
if you want to deal with this situation, then you need to focus on the standard-setting agencies; Chatham, CFR, OECD, BIS, ISO, FATF, ... those all set fragments which through general systems theory integrate down the road.
Chatham and CFR want this 'multi-polar' order, because it benefits them. they couldn't care less about whether it benefits the UK and US.
I chose China as an example of population control, not as an exception to it. I agree that institutions such as Chatham and CFR are sick-and-wrong and I admitted that they have us 80% of the way to becoming a prison planet.
China is also one who promotes the meant-to-be-comforting illusion of a multi-polar world. We won't be in the clear if Chatham House burns to the ground. We will be in the clear when universal values like truth, reason, freedom, individual rights, and justice become as important as they were in the West in the last three centuries.
If universal values never become as important as they were in the West in the last three centuries, then we never make it into the clear (i.e., then there never again will be a bright future for humanity). Those values are indispensable to human happiness.
The picture you paint, the detailed information presented, from an individual standpoint attempting to digest this massive amount of information, detailed throughout centuries is like attempting to understand the UCC codes on steroids! I’m grateful for your research and that you shared it with anyone willing to take the time to read it.
I must admit I’m 😵💫 looking like I need a new plan.
find the evidence. i've looked. didn't find any. i even went through venetian archives.
find the evidence, and by evidence, i don't mean sourceless documents like 'the committee of 300', which in my book is the work of intelligence. the 'black nobility', too, is utterly unsourceable.
Well, I can't claim to provide your level of evidence and thoroughness 🙂
But I'll say a couple of things, for the sake of argument.
One is, people such as Promethean Action who think "Trump" is challenging at a higher level – although I'm not sure it's as high as the BIS standards. And I know you've shown that people working for Trump are implementing conditional development, as in their plans for Gaza, Ukraine etc.
The second thing, and you may not like this, but it is heartening to read Ephesians 6 v 10–17, whether you believe in God or not!
In my view Paul was talking about the same things as you are talking about, 2,000 years ago.
> people such as Promethean Action who think "Trump" is challenging at a higher level
lol, trump speaks a tough game, and then rushes to get the global ai implemented ASAP, while having his special squad of kushner and witkoff implement digital public infrastructure in regions that leak
>In my view Paul was talking about the same things as you are talking about, 2,000 years ago.
quite possibly, but from what i've observed wrt these people, it would seems highly likely they used that as a blueprint. they perverted everything. tree of life as a control structure. catholic social teachings as a route for social justice. they corrupt everything.
"Vote Conservative or Labour — it ultimately doesn’t matter. They both agree on the Sustainable Development Goals, the Convention on Biological Diversity, the UNFCCC Paris Agreement, and so forth. The difference primarily relates to how the message is delivered, and in what order the policy is implemented"
Yes, I've been thinking that for a while. Do you want conservative or liberal-flavoured because they both have the same agenda, with the same jurisdiction, and controlled by the same private entities, just different flavours.
Different flavours - same toxic artificial colours and appearance enhancers. And same "research" to "prove" that they all "follow the science" and are all "evidence-based".
It is not only "You will own nothing and be happy". It is also, "You will think no thoughts other than those that have been "validated" and "authenticated" by the all-knowing AI. And you will love being part of the global hive-mind".
I hope I don't sound like a broken record, but this technocratic structure you so excellently describe, surely doesn't have a mind of its own, operating on its own inherent motives. Someone (or some group - of humans), somewhere, is giving it direction. Some insight into that would be enormously helpful (to add to your quite helpful posts).
If you go back through the archive of articles on ESC's substack and find the articles describing the various very private and almost secret meetings held between various private, international, financial oligarchs -what was produced at the first stage before these various turds were polished and re-packaged by various international "scientific" and "humanitarian" agencies and bodies, you might find some sort of answer to your question. A lot of it is already there -although there is a LOT of material to read. It is even all foot-noted.
Citizens "no longer count as *subjects* affecting the system — rather, they now count as *objects* the system processes. That system reads the citizen continuously. Their responses, including those framed as democratic votes, feed the system that determines what they’re permitted to do next."
I suppose that's where Harari's "under the skin" and Gates' microneedle patch implant with permanent quantum dot QR code come in--in helping to enable holding *individuals* accountable to "what they're permitted to do next," completing the conversion of rights to permissions.
A TV show called "Wild Kingdom" featured a wrangler, Jim, who (in my memory at least) would jump out of a helicopter to tackle, say, a defenseless wildebeest. In GatesKingdom, it'll be drones and fellow citizens. Seems like a disproportionate reaction to a few Belgian cream pies.
This sounds like you've updated Michael Laitmans missing node in the tree of life back to a 10 point system. Instead of the bottom having no feedback up to the top of the hierarchy they now do.
Only they merely provide data and signal. No agency
Yet.
But this in turn theoretically generates more black swan potential as the energy dissipation is not adequately satisfied.
Thus it looks like a very inefficient system and may in turn be a self-generating Black Swan. The AI build out can't see itself as the snake devouring its own tail. Orobouros
Although the primary audience (corporations and investors) differs from SDGs, the core purpose of ESGs—to evaluate financial risks, operational impact, and compliance—constitutes a fundamental pillar of the 'grand architecture'.
The two frameworks often overlap in practice; companies (are required to) use their internal ESG strategies as practical methods to contribute to the global SDGs.
I have wondered for sometime if the incompetence that our present and past governments have so clearly demonstrated was in order to convince us that an AI driven system would work better. I wonder how long it will be before we start to hear suggestions of this in the MSM. Thank you for your work.
This makes me think about C S Lewis's little book, "The Abolition of Man" in which he presciently forsaw the future rise of technocracy (he did not call it that) and described the role that would be occupied by the elite class which he called "the conditioners".
This following bit generated by AI:
Key Points about "The Conditioners":
Manipulation of Human Nature: The conditioners seek to control humanity by shaping values and behaviors, rather than allowing them to develop naturally.
Undermining Morality: Lewis argues that this manipulation ultimately undermines true morality. By imposing artificial values, the conditioners risk erasing the inherent dignity and worth of individuals.
Consequences for Society: The approach of the conditioners can lead to a society where genuine moral understanding is replaced by a superficial adherence to imposed norms, resulting in a loss of authentic human experience.
"The Abolition of Man" written in the 1960's was very prescient about what is going on with increasing intensification today! Worth reading!
Escape Key,
Great synopsis of the system of feedback-based control. Since January this year, China has been utilizing "smart contracts" (programmable money) and is boasting at how efficient it is. China is the anti-Hayek, meaning that, while Hayek (and Mises) proved that central planning cannot ever work, Chinese officials want to continue to believe that they will be able to control things.
In farm subsidies and rural social programs, China boasts that 22% of leakage has been removed by programmable funding. It also conducted a test-run of expiring currency, and found that 94% of poor households given money which expires in 30 days spent it in the first 7 days. Because they do not acknowledge the fundamental truth discovered by Hayek and Mises, they are set up to fail.
It would be a benefit to the West if China fails so fast, and so hard, that it sends the signal to not attempt technocratic totalitarianism in the West (even if we are already 80% to that goal).
One can hope.
the west and east compete to implement the BIS framework. it's a struggle over who occupies the tipheret position. the standards are identical.
sure, point to the exceptions, but if you investigate the historical track record, that tends to eventually align regardless.
china didn't begin developing until they joined EMEAP in 1992, a BIS-connected group of central banks. in 1996, china entered the BIS.
it's why i say that 'the multi-polar world order' often touted by Chatham and CFR is an illusion. what they really signal, is that international organisations control the world order from behind the scenes, exactly as leonard s woolf wanted in 1916
if you want to deal with this situation, then you need to focus on the standard-setting agencies; Chatham, CFR, OECD, BIS, ISO, FATF, ... those all set fragments which through general systems theory integrate down the road.
Chatham and CFR want this 'multi-polar' order, because it benefits them. they couldn't care less about whether it benefits the UK and US.
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/international-government?utm_source=publication-search
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/what-nobody-reads?utm_source=publication-search
I chose China as an example of population control, not as an exception to it. I agree that institutions such as Chatham and CFR are sick-and-wrong and I admitted that they have us 80% of the way to becoming a prison planet.
China is also one who promotes the meant-to-be-comforting illusion of a multi-polar world. We won't be in the clear if Chatham House burns to the ground. We will be in the clear when universal values like truth, reason, freedom, individual rights, and justice become as important as they were in the West in the last three centuries.
If universal values never become as important as they were in the West in the last three centuries, then we never make it into the clear (i.e., then there never again will be a bright future for humanity). Those values are indispensable to human happiness.
The picture you paint, the detailed information presented, from an individual standpoint attempting to digest this massive amount of information, detailed throughout centuries is like attempting to understand the UCC codes on steroids! I’m grateful for your research and that you shared it with anyone willing to take the time to read it.
I must admit I’m 😵💫 looking like I need a new plan.
I think the struggle may be going on at a higher level
find the evidence. i've looked. didn't find any. i even went through venetian archives.
find the evidence, and by evidence, i don't mean sourceless documents like 'the committee of 300', which in my book is the work of intelligence. the 'black nobility', too, is utterly unsourceable.
Well, I can't claim to provide your level of evidence and thoroughness 🙂
But I'll say a couple of things, for the sake of argument.
One is, people such as Promethean Action who think "Trump" is challenging at a higher level – although I'm not sure it's as high as the BIS standards. And I know you've shown that people working for Trump are implementing conditional development, as in their plans for Gaza, Ukraine etc.
The second thing, and you may not like this, but it is heartening to read Ephesians 6 v 10–17, whether you believe in God or not!
In my view Paul was talking about the same things as you are talking about, 2,000 years ago.
> people such as Promethean Action who think "Trump" is challenging at a higher level
lol, trump speaks a tough game, and then rushes to get the global ai implemented ASAP, while having his special squad of kushner and witkoff implement digital public infrastructure in regions that leak
>In my view Paul was talking about the same things as you are talking about, 2,000 years ago.
quite possibly, but from what i've observed wrt these people, it would seems highly likely they used that as a blueprint. they perverted everything. tree of life as a control structure. catholic social teachings as a route for social justice. they corrupt everything.
"Vote Conservative or Labour — it ultimately doesn’t matter. They both agree on the Sustainable Development Goals, the Convention on Biological Diversity, the UNFCCC Paris Agreement, and so forth. The difference primarily relates to how the message is delivered, and in what order the policy is implemented"
Yes, I've been thinking that for a while. Do you want conservative or liberal-flavoured because they both have the same agenda, with the same jurisdiction, and controlled by the same private entities, just different flavours.
Different flavours - same toxic artificial colours and appearance enhancers. And same "research" to "prove" that they all "follow the science" and are all "evidence-based".
It is not only "You will own nothing and be happy". It is also, "You will think no thoughts other than those that have been "validated" and "authenticated" by the all-knowing AI. And you will love being part of the global hive-mind".
thank you
esc,
I hope I don't sound like a broken record, but this technocratic structure you so excellently describe, surely doesn't have a mind of its own, operating on its own inherent motives. Someone (or some group - of humans), somewhere, is giving it direction. Some insight into that would be enormously helpful (to add to your quite helpful posts).
If you go back through the archive of articles on ESC's substack and find the articles describing the various very private and almost secret meetings held between various private, international, financial oligarchs -what was produced at the first stage before these various turds were polished and re-packaged by various international "scientific" and "humanitarian" agencies and bodies, you might find some sort of answer to your question. A lot of it is already there -although there is a LOT of material to read. It is even all foot-noted.
yup
rockefeller brought us 'anticipatory governance' 2001-2011
rockefeller and clinton global initiative brought us 'impact investing' 2007-2011
rothschild's wadddesdon manor brought us 'stranded assets' 2014-2018
in 2015, they brought us the Rothschild Conference on Health and Security 2015
sir bani yas launched in 2010
these meetings convene the high-level forums where the course is set
those people then go on the various UN/EU/BIS/etc technical committees, where they turn it into 20-year plans
the various secretariats/eu commission etc turn that into initiatives which can be voted on
the general assembly/european commission then vote for fragments of the 20-year plans, framed around some 'ethical imperative'
if you just want names then you're looking for rothschild, rockefeller, carnegie, warburg, ford, gates, soros, ...
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/earth-in-the-balance?utm_source=publication-search
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/epstein-iii?utm_source=publication-search
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-waddesdon-papers?utm_source=publication-search
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/health-and-peace?utm_source=publication-search
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/sir-bani-yas?utm_source=publication-search
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-rothschild-nexus?utm_source=publication-search
Thank you for your great commitment to explain
Citizens "no longer count as *subjects* affecting the system — rather, they now count as *objects* the system processes. That system reads the citizen continuously. Their responses, including those framed as democratic votes, feed the system that determines what they’re permitted to do next."
I suppose that's where Harari's "under the skin" and Gates' microneedle patch implant with permanent quantum dot QR code come in--in helping to enable holding *individuals* accountable to "what they're permitted to do next," completing the conversion of rights to permissions.
A TV show called "Wild Kingdom" featured a wrangler, Jim, who (in my memory at least) would jump out of a helicopter to tackle, say, a defenseless wildebeest. In GatesKingdom, it'll be drones and fellow citizens. Seems like a disproportionate reaction to a few Belgian cream pies.
This sounds like you've updated Michael Laitmans missing node in the tree of life back to a 10 point system. Instead of the bottom having no feedback up to the top of the hierarchy they now do.
Only they merely provide data and signal. No agency
Yet.
But this in turn theoretically generates more black swan potential as the energy dissipation is not adequately satisfied.
Thus it looks like a very inefficient system and may in turn be a self-generating Black Swan. The AI build out can't see itself as the snake devouring its own tail. Orobouros
oh yeah it'll turbo-charge the black swans for sure, and cause demonstrations in the streets
the proles will just have to deal with increased police violence in the name of 'saving democracy'
Worth mentioning: the role of ESGs.
Although the primary audience (corporations and investors) differs from SDGs, the core purpose of ESGs—to evaluate financial risks, operational impact, and compliance—constitutes a fundamental pillar of the 'grand architecture'.
The two frameworks often overlap in practice; companies (are required to) use their internal ESG strategies as practical methods to contribute to the global SDGs.
I have wondered for sometime if the incompetence that our present and past governments have so clearly demonstrated was in order to convince us that an AI driven system would work better. I wonder how long it will be before we start to hear suggestions of this in the MSM. Thank you for your work.
the MSM will cover it precisely when they no longer can cover it up
at first, they will ignore it
then intelligence agents (and bots) will fight it on the blogs posting about it
then the MSM will smear it as 'russian disinformation'
then they will claim it's racist and nazi equivalent
then they will seek to dox anyone even loosely associated with it
then, 3 years down the line, after loosing even more credibility they will weaselly implicitly admit their reporting was horrendously biased
i never watch the MSM. tell my wife off for switching on GB News.
...is the Third Temple being built in Washington, DC?... https://youtu.be/znx1sCY4JKA?is=jmjuljtb_OO_Zn6e ... 🙏➕🙏...