The Story of the Working Groups

If there is one expression I’ve seen frequently, trawling UN, EU, and so forth documentation and papers, it’s the term ‘working group’. They use them for literally everything. And they’re always named as such. Let’s go through a number of working groups, which are of interest in the context of Covid-19 and Digital IDs.

This won’t include the working groups initiated by the UN initiative, the Broadband Commission, which eventually became the template for the various Online Safety bills we see introduced around the world - the legislation regarding outright censorship. If you haven’t read this, I would suggest you do as we don’t have much time left.

-

The United Nations love a good working group. The secuty council, in fact, have an entire webpage dedicated to them, all related to ‘peacekeeping’.

In fact, they’re so great that even the Sustainable Development Goals have one - the Open Working Group on Sustainable Development Goals. I won’t detail what they do. I’m just going to point out the overriding objective here.

In fact, this particular Working Group was founded in January, 2013. In its eigth meeting, legal identity (SDG 16.9) was the topic - I’ve covered this before - but in short, the EU emphasised said ID a key aspect of the rule of law, and a prerequisite to access health and education.

Mandatory ID.

I previously covered 16.9 here. In short, it’s about digital ID. While it may not be explicit in the short form text, all surrounding documentation is fairly explicit in this regard.

This, furthermore, would lead to the proposals which eventually became the EU Vaccination Cerfiticate - thanks in part to Thierry Breton - which in short is Digital ID. No wonder the WHO recently adopted it.

Anyway, the EU were not to be left behind. So they created the High-Level expert group on Artificial Intelligence. This took place in June, 2018 - at the very same time the paper, ‘Improving Language Understanding by Generative Pre-Training’ was released, which would eventually become ChatGPT-1.

Eventually, this became the below draft by WHO: ‘Draft Guidance document: Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health‘ - yes, really.

The WHO almost immediately considered using AI for health, and - per document - took early feedback by Nov 30, 2020.

As for us common proles, when was ChatGPT released to the public? Almost four years later. Astonishing, no?

As for the WHO and OpenAI - what do they have in common, you think? More on this later.

Regardless, to protect us, the WHO eventually released the full ‘Ethics & Governance of Artificial Intelligence for Health‘ guidance in June, 2021.

Of course, the WHO has an essential program on Immunisation - and they created the ‘Measuring Behavioural and Social Drivers of Vaccination global working group‘. A quick look at the acknowledgements, you say? Happy to comply.

Read that, then read it again and make sure you took it all in.

The WHO operated a behavioural and social drivers of vaccination working group, and it operated in the time range November 2018 - January 2022. I mean, the amount of extraordinary coincidences going on here is simply amazing, and never appear to stop.

Naturally, with Gates Foundation representation. Let’s have a quick look at who he is. Now, why does a Foundation need a professional manipulator, exactly? And - back to an earlier question - who’s the primary funder of OpenAI? Microsoft. The corporation which Bill Gates founded.

And Bill Gates? Does he have a connection to the WHO, perchance? Oh boy - does he ever! But wait - there’s more!

Another $5 billion to GAVI, who in turn fund the WHO.

In other words, Bill Gates funds the WHO, who - before anyone had realistically heard of it - started to consider the importance of combining health and AI, while the primary investor is the very company Gates founded, and which he still owns $35bn worth of shares.

Swiftly moving on, the WHO also has a ‘Smart Vaccination Certificate Working Group’. The current website is here, but the more interesting is the first version Wayback Machine has in its cache.

It’s from February, 2021.

Which is when Alan Gelb released his note on the EU Covid-19 Vaccination Certificate being a ‘form of ID’. And Gelb works for - The Center for Global Development. The CGD. And they are funded by…

The Gates Foundation. To the tune of $85m.

Anyway, moving swiftly on - the ‘International Working Group on Vaccination and Public Health Solutions’, featuring Peter Hotez and, yes, Heidi Larson released the Salzburg Declaration on Vaccination Acceptance - in July, 2019.

But that’s only actually half the story - the other half is that they deliberately, and intentionally, called for a crackdown on vaccine misinformation.

Yes, the Peter Hotez, who right now is refusing to debate RFK, Jr on Rogan straight up called for misinformation to be legislated against, and censored on the internet.

To complete the ensemble here, let’s backtrack to EU’s ‘High-level expert group on artificial intelligence‘, because footnotes are always worth a careful look. They added a link to the ‘Transatlantic High Level Working Group on Content Moderation Online and Freedom of Expression’. I previously covered them here, they are part of the effort to push through the Online Safety act, and similars - all originating with the UN’s Broadband Commission.

In other words, they are the Working Group given the task to push through this legislation through parliaments, democratically, of course - as in, completely without consulting the public in an honest way.

Oh yeah, and the group is chock full of WEF members.

-

So - to re-cap.

We here have a Working Group on SDGs, which in the past has debated Digital IDs, and furthermore is closely related to Working Groups on AI and Health, vaccination ethics, vaccination behaviourals, vaccination for children, demands for ‘misinformation’ censorship and legislation, and eventual with ties to a group - the Transatlantic Working Group - specifically setup to drive censorship through parliaments, and with UK Folkestone Tory MP, Damian Collins, as a member - who’s, entirely coincidentally, has been the primary pusher of the Online Safety Bill in the UK.

And finally - all of these coincided immediately prior to Covid-19.

And this is a giant coincidence?