'In a world of digital money, the intermediary with the best data and the most liquidity should be the best facilitator of credit, independently of who owns the largest stores of deposits'
Had to be Mossad. Had to have Knesset, Israeli support for concept development and feedback. Network was more porous than the main hub but all this smacks of a central intelligence.
Thank you, esc. I have studiously ignored the Epstein material. I've noticed that people so engrossed soon see "the abyss staring back at them."
However, this aspect of Epstein is valuable and important because it reveals an insight into what I call "The Controllers' Minds." Well done. If humanity is to be prepared, they must understand their enemy. Basic Sun Tzu. I think people like Catherine Austin Fitts, who lived through .gov attempting to destroy her, understands and tries to pass along her feelings, but I think very few people truly understand what she's saying.
A real life, updated Ps of the Es of Z. I'm supposed to be out in the cold splitting firewood. And here I am inside by the fire engrossed in the pieces of a monstrous plot, skillfully assembled by our host. Nice work. Thanks.
Do I so understand right, that this crypto is ready, waiting to be implemented any moment now while they claim that CBDCs are not ready to be implemented before 2027-28?
I wanna say something to your post but because I‘m a german I’m not allowed to update the app so a bunch of things I couldn’t do as for example answering posts…
To your post: The system they construct is context-agnostic. Replace the ‘ethical’ SDGs with racial purity, and you’re in Nazi Germany. Replace with ‘duty towards the collective’ and you’re in the Soviet Union. Replace it with ‘Silly Hat Thursdays’, and…
I would argue: You don’t need to replace them it’s original the same thing Nazi Germany was the first country to implement strong environmental and animal protecting safe rules and laws as the Reichsnaturgesetzte
Wow! After reading through this second part it's time for a long walk. Need to clear the mental deck for part three. Thank you for your illumination of the underbelly of the sex/intelligence veneer of this topic.
Bendell here. Epstein and I did not reach an agreement, he did not fund my work, and so he did not commission me. In the email cited in this piece, I explained he couldn't host an event but be in attendance. That followed up my mention on the phone that I had a concern about his reputation. I thought that might end the correspondence and yes it did: he never responded to my proposal. Instead he funded MIT to pursue his aims. Perhaps others as well - key to his agenda was stablecoins. My work on the environment is clearly anti-globalist, and my negative experience of WEF dynamics helped me reach that view. If you search eco-libertarianism or search my blog you will see that: jembendell.com There could be a good article in here about how he shaped crypto and why, without the false claims that aren't supported by the emails in the files. Also on my blog, from 2 years ago, is a post where I reflect on what I did wrong in being open to consider a collaboration and what ive learned from that.
you can begin by addressing whether central bankers are included in your definition of 'globalists'. if so, please point me towards a former piece, where you criticise exactly those, thank you.
please be explicit about which claims are fake.
if you're an anti-globalist, then why are you a YGL, class 2012?
> Did not reach an agreement, he did not fund my work, and so he did not commission me.
absence of completed transaction isn't absence of relationship. you were in talks about hosting events and receiving funding - the proposal existed. that's not disproof of willingness on your part.
>I explained he couldn't host an event but be in attendance."
you were negotiating the terms under which Epstein would participate. you were NOT refusing engagement — but rather offering to manage it. that's more revealing than a simple yes or no.
>Instead he funded MIT to pursue his aims
you WERE in the pipeline, then, but the choice fell elsewhere
I've written a lot about the problem with banking and central banking. Including a detailed academic paper on the Monetary Growth Imperative. So yes, anyone who thinks global elites should manage systems that coerce and manipulate is globalist. Search globalist on my website and you will see, for instance my latest speech in Stroud where I took a lot of heat. There are no emails from Epstein and me about working with each other after I sent him the proposal Sept 17th 2012. Despite loads before. The key was I'd told him on the phone we had a reputation problem and then my proposal included that he couldn't host but anyone invited would need to be told he'd be there. Its in the proposal email you quote from. I presumed he wouldn't like it and he didn't. We never spoke again. Instead he helped make stablecoins the new backing for US dollar hegemony. I'm pleased some people are looking into that aspect. It is not just fake but misleading to claim I was commissioned or funded. Didn't happen. Its another issue about whether I was right to entertain the idea of him funding at the time. I wasn't. I've written about that, apologised and explained my learnings. You ask why I'm anti-globalist if I'd been a YGL. Precisely because I was a YGL and it helped me to see that the culture of elites wouldn't help the world. I've got a book out in 2023 which has a whole chapter calling for resistance to the fake green globalist agenda. Ive even been on national Australian radio talking about that. Without the false claims about me the research you did for the article could help people get closer to what exactly happened, why and what to do about it.
>I've written a lot about the problem with banking and central banking
youve criticised policy, not architecture. you;ve never traced who designed the institutions, who held BIS equity, which families sit above the central bankers you name. writing about specific central bank policy decisions is not arguing whether the concept is flawed in the first place
wrt the Epstein timeline - that's actually somewhat of a confession. you say there are 'loads' of emails before September 17, 2012 - loads.
your defense is that it stopped after his proposal — not that it shouldn't have started. as for 'I presumed he wouldn't like it and he didn't' this in effect means you were managing Epstein's comfort level, not refusing engagement.
wrt YGL, have you formally distanced yourself? have you renounced the designation, or do you still carry it on your CV like the WEF carries you on their website?
>Stablecoins the new backing for US dollar hegemony
irrelevant to my work. i speak of the architecture behind CBDCs.
and that's incidentally where my main line of questioning, because what you called for for a digital currency in relation to carrying out 'social good' sustainable development, wasn't it?
please explain how that would come about without conditionality of the sort embeded in Project Rosalind, through its Three-Party Lock function?
i'm not expecting further replies, to be quite honest. i've dug through your record, and it's a little hard to defend. i certainly wouldnt even bother if i were you. we don't have just programmable currencies but also impact investing. we have the full palette, and you clearly proposed it in context of the SDGs.
also
>There are no emails from Epstein and me about working with each other after I sent him the proposal Sept 17th 2012
Even worse and more important than being a sex offender is the secret, deceptive, nepotistic, self-centered individual and his like-minded parasitic compadres. One could even question if the sexual allegations really happened but the scheming is undeniable.
'In a world of digital money, the intermediary with the best data and the most liquidity should be the best facilitator of credit, independently of who owns the largest stores of deposits'
There's that BoE clearinghouse logic again
it's monopolisation of issuance of credit
oh wait that's also plank 5 in the commie manifesto. another 'coincidence'.
And requires total surveillance to work. Funny how that seems to work across all slave systems.
quiet, or you will not qualify for 'equity' aka planetary skinner box rewards for compliance.
Yeah I love he met with that vain ghost Brandon about 'rewards systems' he was perfecting with that pedo named Virgin airline.
Thank You, ESC. I'll integrate this into the blog post I'm putting together today.
Powerful analysis. Reading your work feels like being a fly on the wall of meeting rooms I never dreamed existed
Had to be Mossad. Had to have Knesset, Israeli support for concept development and feedback. Network was more porous than the main hub but all this smacks of a central intelligence.
Thank you, esc. I have studiously ignored the Epstein material. I've noticed that people so engrossed soon see "the abyss staring back at them."
However, this aspect of Epstein is valuable and important because it reveals an insight into what I call "The Controllers' Minds." Well done. If humanity is to be prepared, they must understand their enemy. Basic Sun Tzu. I think people like Catherine Austin Fitts, who lived through .gov attempting to destroy her, understands and tries to pass along her feelings, but I think very few people truly understand what she's saying.
A real life, updated Ps of the Es of Z. I'm supposed to be out in the cold splitting firewood. And here I am inside by the fire engrossed in the pieces of a monstrous plot, skillfully assembled by our host. Nice work. Thanks.
Excellent research. Just wow! Right at the start I had a thought....Chatham House Rules = Omerta.....
Thank you, great work!
This brilliant work has inspired me to post - hope it is OK to have condensed some info & cross referenced you posts.
https://annetteo.substack.com/p/evil-in-candy-colours
Well done. Impressive summary.
Do I so understand right, that this crypto is ready, waiting to be implemented any moment now while they claim that CBDCs are not ready to be implemented before 2027-28?
no, not quite. it's not quite ready. but it's close.
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-sdg-machine
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/quant/
quant has been operating in real-time for years.
I wanna say something to your post but because I‘m a german I’m not allowed to update the app so a bunch of things I couldn’t do as for example answering posts…
To your post: The system they construct is context-agnostic. Replace the ‘ethical’ SDGs with racial purity, and you’re in Nazi Germany. Replace with ‘duty towards the collective’ and you’re in the Soviet Union. Replace it with ‘Silly Hat Thursdays’, and…
I would argue: You don’t need to replace them it’s original the same thing Nazi Germany was the first country to implement strong environmental and animal protecting safe rules and laws as the Reichsnaturgesetzte
https://juli2a5i4.substack.com/p/dangerous-doomsday-cults?r=1pk0jl
https://juli2a5i4.substack.com/p/epstein-the-dangerous-virus-that?r=1pk0jl&utm
brad garlinghouse, ceo ripple aka xrp on the
Panel Discussions, 9th High-Level Conference on the International Monetary System, 14.05.2019
youtube.com/watch?v=yyqdQlCMwjs&t=8607s
##ripple #garlinghouse
Wow! After reading through this second part it's time for a long walk. Need to clear the mental deck for part three. Thank you for your illumination of the underbelly of the sex/intelligence veneer of this topic.
"The currency of the future is compliance." -madebyjimbob
Bendell here. Epstein and I did not reach an agreement, he did not fund my work, and so he did not commission me. In the email cited in this piece, I explained he couldn't host an event but be in attendance. That followed up my mention on the phone that I had a concern about his reputation. I thought that might end the correspondence and yes it did: he never responded to my proposal. Instead he funded MIT to pursue his aims. Perhaps others as well - key to his agenda was stablecoins. My work on the environment is clearly anti-globalist, and my negative experience of WEF dynamics helped me reach that view. If you search eco-libertarianism or search my blog you will see that: jembendell.com There could be a good article in here about how he shaped crypto and why, without the false claims that aren't supported by the emails in the files. Also on my blog, from 2 years ago, is a post where I reflect on what I did wrong in being open to consider a collaboration and what ive learned from that.
you can begin by addressing whether central bankers are included in your definition of 'globalists'. if so, please point me towards a former piece, where you criticise exactly those, thank you.
please be explicit about which claims are fake.
if you're an anti-globalist, then why are you a YGL, class 2012?
> Did not reach an agreement, he did not fund my work, and so he did not commission me.
absence of completed transaction isn't absence of relationship. you were in talks about hosting events and receiving funding - the proposal existed. that's not disproof of willingness on your part.
>I explained he couldn't host an event but be in attendance."
you were negotiating the terms under which Epstein would participate. you were NOT refusing engagement — but rather offering to manage it. that's more revealing than a simple yes or no.
>Instead he funded MIT to pursue his aims
you WERE in the pipeline, then, but the choice fell elsewhere
right, that should be a good start.
I've written a lot about the problem with banking and central banking. Including a detailed academic paper on the Monetary Growth Imperative. So yes, anyone who thinks global elites should manage systems that coerce and manipulate is globalist. Search globalist on my website and you will see, for instance my latest speech in Stroud where I took a lot of heat. There are no emails from Epstein and me about working with each other after I sent him the proposal Sept 17th 2012. Despite loads before. The key was I'd told him on the phone we had a reputation problem and then my proposal included that he couldn't host but anyone invited would need to be told he'd be there. Its in the proposal email you quote from. I presumed he wouldn't like it and he didn't. We never spoke again. Instead he helped make stablecoins the new backing for US dollar hegemony. I'm pleased some people are looking into that aspect. It is not just fake but misleading to claim I was commissioned or funded. Didn't happen. Its another issue about whether I was right to entertain the idea of him funding at the time. I wasn't. I've written about that, apologised and explained my learnings. You ask why I'm anti-globalist if I'd been a YGL. Precisely because I was a YGL and it helped me to see that the culture of elites wouldn't help the world. I've got a book out in 2023 which has a whole chapter calling for resistance to the fake green globalist agenda. Ive even been on national Australian radio talking about that. Without the false claims about me the research you did for the article could help people get closer to what exactly happened, why and what to do about it.
>I've written a lot about the problem with banking and central banking
youve criticised policy, not architecture. you;ve never traced who designed the institutions, who held BIS equity, which families sit above the central bankers you name. writing about specific central bank policy decisions is not arguing whether the concept is flawed in the first place
wrt the Epstein timeline - that's actually somewhat of a confession. you say there are 'loads' of emails before September 17, 2012 - loads.
your defense is that it stopped after his proposal — not that it shouldn't have started. as for 'I presumed he wouldn't like it and he didn't' this in effect means you were managing Epstein's comfort level, not refusing engagement.
wrt YGL, have you formally distanced yourself? have you renounced the designation, or do you still carry it on your CV like the WEF carries you on their website?
https://www.weforum.org/stories/authors/jem-bendell/
>Without the false claims
i asked you point blank to name them.
>I've even been on national Australian radio
that is absolutely no proof of anything
>Stablecoins the new backing for US dollar hegemony
irrelevant to my work. i speak of the architecture behind CBDCs.
and that's incidentally where my main line of questioning, because what you called for for a digital currency in relation to carrying out 'social good' sustainable development, wasn't it?
please explain how that would come about without conditionality of the sort embeded in Project Rosalind, through its Three-Party Lock function?
i'm not expecting further replies, to be quite honest. i've dug through your record, and it's a little hard to defend. i certainly wouldnt even bother if i were you. we don't have just programmable currencies but also impact investing. we have the full palette, and you clearly proposed it in context of the SDGs.
also
>There are no emails from Epstein and me about working with each other after I sent him the proposal Sept 17th 2012
that's not actually true
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02721858.pdf
apart from all the lying about the Epstein emails you mean?
Never spoke again?
great find
holy moly, so it wasn't just a week out as per above, it was two years out.
ok, that's his credibility completely shot.
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00985724.pdf
hah, here's from 2017
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00710887.pdf
here's one from 2013
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00710887.pdf
here's another one from 2014
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA02113075.pdf
and they even skyped on March 10, 2014.
wow. the dishonesty.
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA02112079.pdf
Even worse and more important than being a sex offender is the secret, deceptive, nepotistic, self-centered individual and his like-minded parasitic compadres. One could even question if the sexual allegations really happened but the scheming is undeniable.