27 Comments
User's avatar
Protect & Survive's avatar

Thank you ESC for excellent research and I agree your conclusions. The Global (Western) Financial System is reaching its limits and insiders have known this for many decades. Maybe 'The Great Taking' is being prepared for enacting in due course? But where is China in all this?

https://austrianpeter.substack.com/p/the-financial-jigsaw-part-2-64-the

My thesis was published here in 2021: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358117070_THE_FINANCIAL_JIGSAW_-_PART_1_-_4th_Edition_2020

esc's avatar
31mEdited

the present structure is being erected so there's no slack in the system. when the final, terminal error propagates through the system, freezing the retail side of banking, it will happen in microseconds.

and when that happens, those who control the wholesale markets, and especially those who coordinate (the BIS) are in a position to dictate terms.

that's what i reckon will happen, or rather, that's what they aim for. add the un emergency platform which legitimises the use of force to lock down people in the name of 'protecting' them.

haven't yet read your thesis, but i've downloaded it.

Protect & Survive's avatar

Thanks ESC, I appreciate your interest and welcome your critque in due course. Do you think the Global South and BRICS are going their own way to avoid the coming crisis? I stay in South Africa - it's on my doorstep - but I doubt I will live long enough to see the end result!

Rypke Zeilmaker's avatar

Maybe you can also find a link between the Epstein files and the 'High Level Panel of Eminent Persons' of the UN, that established the Post 2015 Development Agenda (aka the SDG's) with David Cameron as it's president, and John Podesta in the board. (and 'our' Paul Polman, the green saviour who pocketed tens of millions of bonuses at his time at Unilever)

Or is it in the Podesta files?

It seems Cameron was picked because the Miliband-administration pioneered with the Social Bond programme in 2010, followed by 'Diaspora Bonds' through the African Development Bank, and later even 'Refugee Bonds'

Polman went on to form his multinational coalition 'Imagine', the John Lennon-song that was sang by Shakira at the launch of the SDG's in New York. Imagine = 'the great reset', own nothing and be happy, no country, no religion, no possession, except the one who promotes it was pocketing bonuses by the multimillions

The Peace Palace of the Carnegie Foundation in The Hague holds the 'Imagine Tree' where you can post your wishes for 'the better world'

esc's avatar

sounds like you've already got it covered

Rypke Zeilmaker's avatar

Again a post as if a whole newspaper board worked on it for days and you seem to spit it out in hours; excellent

You may have seen how in the year 2009, the Ariane de Rothschild firm brokered the 'blended finance' deal with the Maldives (Net Zero in 2020), going viral with their underwater conference prior to the COP15 in Copenhagen

At this COP the Green Climate Fund was prepared by the Dutch delegation (Maas Goote) before being launched at Cancun in 2010.The Dutch have been instrumental in the financialisation of 'debt to history' (combating 'inequality') through Jan Tinbergen's acolyte in politics, Jan Pronk at least since 1972 and 'Reshaping International Order' (why was the Earth Summit in 'RIO' in 1992)

https://www.greenclimate.fund/about/timeline

Ofcourse, Maldives never went Net Zero in 2020, but the goal was established: 107 million euro of public development bank funding for greenie stuff already in 2021, backing up private investments

https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2021/07/12/towards-a-sustainable-net-zero-future-in-maldives

Blended Finance in action, a safe haven of subsidies

esc's avatar
1hEdited

as i've said in the past, i know the surroundings very well, i've spent almost 3 years establishing it all in detail - just have to decipher the Epstein emails.

anyway, that's perfect timing - that's immediately prior to Rothschild's Moringa fund specialising in blended finance came to be (2010)

2009 also saw the 'failed' Copenhagen Accord which gave private parties $100bn of taxpayer money

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/a-unfccccbd-synthesis?utm_source=publication-search

also, i went through RIO over here

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-third-system?utm_source=publication-search

PFC Billy's avatar

Ah, palace intrigue during the Nixon administration!

This seems so quaint and naive compared to the present ugliness and intrigue. Just the highest level of the US military actively spying on their elected (nominal) boss to obstruct the long accepted principle of civilian government command of US military and undercut the executive branch ability to command so the top military brass might pursue their own agendas, barely an inconvenience.

John Day MD's avatar

A whole lot changed in Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon years, and it still can't be let out...

;-(

Lo Thompson's avatar

Staggering. Great work 👏

MakerOfNoise's avatar

JPMC holds the Rockefeller family trusts (see link), surely worth hundreds of billions at a bare minimum. As much of a role that David Rockefeller played in Epstein's career, I would expect JPMC to be kept very, very close to Epstein. Jes was obviously that link.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockefeller_family (see the "Wealth" sub-heading)

The Rockefellers also owned the Twin Towers in NY.

MakerOfNoise's avatar

esc - you write "These are actions taken by a man who takes operational security seriously."

Using Gmail for your evil world-domination plans? He had the money to run his own IT department. I'm sure he made a conscious decision to use Gmail, but why? Secure comms is spycraft 101.

esc's avatar

you mean like hillary did?

MakerOfNoise's avatar

Touché!

grahamlyons's avatar

At least "The Prince" was not violent in his "interactions" with girls, while Barak, according to several reports, was the opposite, reflecting his vicious Zionist nature.

@Olambda's avatar

Well, well, well, who is Andrew farkas?

https://jmail.world/thread/vol00009-efta00821044-pdf?view=inbox

"- afghani, not paki, and i knew from the begiinng but did not want to ask questions. I know the gory details. .

- I thought Pakistani that's what everyone always said...interesting... I don't want to know ugh :( ( she is so crazy....none of us believed it when we found out but then she started admitting to it. Andrew farkas is the worst!"

@Olambda's avatar

Seems unrelated, my bad (UK context mislead me)

Ubetcha's avatar

Outstanding work! I must say, I'm kind of surprised you're still walking around. They tend not to like this kind of publicity.

I still wonder what line JE crossed to get himself "killed" (or moved to Argentina). There may be some insight in the documents.

esc's avatar

part 1 essentially makes the argument that he had served his purpose, and by 2019, had become a liability

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/epstein

Momo's avatar

I am speechless. All I can think of to say is thank you.

Jude Thomson's avatar

Another excellent essay. Though I would have written ‘Gaddafi’s sovereign leadership’ instead of ‘Gaddafi’s dictatorship’. Like Thomas Sankara, he just wanted Africa’s sovereignty. The parallel governance that rules the world wouldn’t allow it. How Hilary Clinton laughed like a hyena when she watched his brutal death involving sodomy!! They must all rot in hell these evil orchestrators of injustice

@Olambda's avatar

Just a a note:

In French "Rapport de la Commission pour la libération de la croissance française" established at the demand of Nicolas Sarközy, known as "Rapport Attali", 2008. It's watered down in more down-to-earth and day-by-day objectives but fits the agenda. Young Macron was involved in it. A trace of his style? "This is not a report, nor a study but operating instructions for urgent and founding reforms. It is neither partisan nor bi-partisan: it is non-partisan./ It is not an inventory in which a government could peck at and even less a competition of original suggestions condemned to remain marginal. It is a coherent entirety, of which each piece is articulated with the others, each element of which is the key to success of the whole. (...)" !!

Deregulation and creation of control entities (specialized agencies), build public-private system, promote bank investments in small entreprises (big ones "helping" smaller ones), tech, biotech and nanotech grid, digital control (police and justice, digital signature), incentive finance, vax promotion (creation of validation bodies), opening health facilities to foreigners (!!!), neurosciences, sustainable development, green growth, creation of "ecopolis" integrating green tech and communication tech, green taxation, reinforcing the constitutional notion of "dammage" towards penalising nuisance

https://www.vie-publique.fr/files/rapport/pdf/084000041.pdf

KC Sunshine's avatar

Very much appreciate your meticulous research

Kerrin Naudé's avatar

I always laugh when i see "Global Impact Forum" etc. These names are utter running jokes. "Value" is when the market wants what you are supplying and would happily pay for it, "impact" is when nobody wants to pay for it but you need to shove it down people's throats anyway and PR that fact for the next five years as the basis of your marketing strategy.