Richard DeSocio in his book Clash of Dynasties squarely blames Nelson Rockefeller for the assassination of JFK. Donald Gibson in Battling Wall Street showes that Kennedy came into conflict with every single member of the Rockefeller's: David, Nelson, Laurence and J.D. Rockefeller III.
i have a longer post on the amory/schlesinger timeline with sources under construction. but schlesinger wanted to reform the CIA in mid-61. and schlesinger/amory were calling for a 'world congress for freedom and democracy' which essentially was a quasi-trilateral commission.
Well done! Thank you for your excellent chronicling efforts on this piece. I have long agreed that the last time the U.S. actually had a president that seemed to me to be genuinely a caring human being with regard to what was best for both national Sovereignty and individual freedom based upon sound, ethical and moral grounds. This does not even begin to deal with the clear cut ever increasingly downward slide of the nation's reputation, as a whole, with regard to how and why it has come to be, and justifiably so, viewed with strong disdain and disapproval by not only many American citizens, but by citizens of many other nations as well.
Perhaps systems management is itself agnostic. But the tools of systems management, as described in this article, in the hands of nefarious actors, enables nothing short of the rise of an antichrist. The only way to fight that machine is with ones own machine.
Richard DeSocio in his book Clash of Dynasties squarely blames Nelson Rockefeller for the assassination of JFK. Donald Gibson in Battling Wall Street showes that Kennedy came into conflict with every single member of the Rockefeller's: David, Nelson, Laurence and J.D. Rockefeller III.
This all ties in with your hypothesis.
i have a longer post on the amory/schlesinger timeline with sources under construction. but schlesinger wanted to reform the CIA in mid-61. and schlesinger/amory were calling for a 'world congress for freedom and democracy' which essentially was a quasi-trilateral commission.
https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/document/18285-national-security-archive-doc-02-memorandum
also, longer post revolving around Robert Amory, Jr over here
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-fourth-casualty?utm_source=publication-search
Technocracy must be viewed and realised by people that this technocratic future is a major threat to humanity and individual freedom or sovereignty.
Agreed 100%!
Well done! Thank you for your excellent chronicling efforts on this piece. I have long agreed that the last time the U.S. actually had a president that seemed to me to be genuinely a caring human being with regard to what was best for both national Sovereignty and individual freedom based upon sound, ethical and moral grounds. This does not even begin to deal with the clear cut ever increasingly downward slide of the nation's reputation, as a whole, with regard to how and why it has come to be, and justifiably so, viewed with strong disdain and disapproval by not only many American citizens, but by citizens of many other nations as well.
Constantin von Hoffmeister offers some prosaic insight on the tools of system management in the hands of moral actors. Another that comes to mind is the plotline of the 2011 Person of Interest series : https://www.eurosiberia.net/p/the-ballad-of-saint-george-and-the-globalist-wyrm
Perhaps systems management is itself agnostic. But the tools of systems management, as described in this article, in the hands of nefarious actors, enables nothing short of the rise of an antichrist. The only way to fight that machine is with ones own machine.
Interesting story. Too bad it was all just a scam like Gorebull Warming and the WuFlu.