The British covertly supported the founding of the Muslim Brotherhood, appreciating that its theme was that the “Quran is our constitution” - i.e., no nation-states, no sovereign countries, no nationalism.
British Creation and Control of Islamic Terror: Background to China’s Defeat of Terror in Xinjiang
The Club of Rome’s 1972 publication The Limits To Growth was a Malthusian blueprint on how the human population needed to be reduced in order to prevent an ecological collapse, which in itself was merely a disguised version of the abhorrent eugenicist ideas that were circulating in the early part of the 20th century and eventually died out with Hitler.
The widely discredited population bomb paranoia of the 70′s and 80′s was gradually replaced by the climate change fear-mongering that we see the organization pushing today, which again is merely another regurgitation of the eugenics-obsessed policies of the elite.
Prominent members of the Club of Rome include Al Gore and Maurice Strong, both of whom are intimately involved with privately-owned carbon trading groups like the Chicago Climate Exchange, whose multi-million dollar profits are solely reliant on protecting the credibility of the man-made global warming thesis from skeptics who have challenged its legitimacy in light of the Climategate scandal.
On page 75 of their 1990 publication entitled The First Global Revolution, the organization outlined how they would manufacture ecological scares in order to manipulate the public into accepting the imposition of a dictatorial world government run by them.
“In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill…
All these dangers are caused by human intervention… The real enemy, then, is humanity itself,”
states the report, which can be read in full at the end of this article.
The passage appears under a subheadline entitled, “The common enemy of humanity is Man.”
Of course, to unite the public against a common enemy, by using 'divide and conquer' to turn humanity against itself, villains need to be created in the public eye who can be blamed for slowing efforts to save the planet from the mythical threat of global warming, even as Arctic ice levels return to normal and much of the globe has just experienced its coldest winter in decades.
With global warmists despondent at the fact that reality hasn’t backed up their increasingly fanatical predictions, and with public opinion increasingly turning against them, they’re simply pushing ahead anyway with the agenda to impose authoritarian control measures to regulate and tax every aspect of our existence.
And if you don’t like it, then you’re obviously a well-funded propagandist for oil companies (which in fact are the most aggressive proponents of global warming), and merely questioning the likes of Al Gore is a 'crime against humanity' for which you will be summarily silenced and punished.
Restoring the feudal order is, in fact, the true and hidden goal of globalism.
How the British Invented Color Revolutions
As the British Empire shifted from a colonial to a neocolonial system, it had to develop quieter, more discreet methods for removing rebellious vassals
Lord William Rees-Mogg set forth his globalist beliefs in a series of books co-written with U.S. investment writer James Dale Davidson.
In The Sovereign Individual (1997), the authors prophesied that “Western nations” would soon “crack apart in the manner of the former Soviet Union,” to be replaced by tiny jurisdictions “akin to city-states” which would “emerge from the rubble of nations.”15
The authors predicted that, “Some of these new entities, like the Knights Templar and other religious and military orders of the Middle Ages, may control considerable wealth and military power without controlling any fixed territory.”
As in the days of “feudalism,” wrote Rees-Mogg and Davidson, “low-income persons in Western countries” would survive by attaching themselves to “wealthy households as retainers.”16
In other words, the lower classes would return to serfdom.
This was all for the best, the authors wrote, as it would allow the “ablest people” — i.e. the “top five percent” — to live where they liked and do as they liked, free from loyalties or obligations to any particular nation or government.
“As the era of the ‘Sovereign Individual’ takes shape,” the authors concluded, “many of the ablest people will cease to think of themselves as party to a nation, as ‘British’ or ‘American’ or ‘Canadian.’ A new ‘transnational’ or ‘extranational’ understanding of the world and a new way of identifying one’s place in it await discovery in the new millennium.”
George Soros named his network of Open Society Foundations in honor of his London School of Economics (LSE) professor Karl Popper, whose theory of “open society” guides Soros’s activism to this day.
Popper’s 1945 masterwork, The Open Society and Its Enemies, is a philosophical defense of imperialism, specifically of British liberal imperialism, as espoused by LSE’s founders.
The Fabian socialists who founded LSE believed that British expansion was the greatest civilizing force in an otherwise barbarous world.
In his book, Popper expressly defended imperial conquest as a first step in wiping out tribal and national identities, to clear the way for a “Universal Empire of Man.”
By the 1990s, privileged families like Rees-Mogg’s had grown tired of hiding. They yearned for the good old days, when they could live openly in their castles and command their serfs.
Oxford political scientist Hedley Bull played to this crowd when he predicted, in his 1977 book The Anarchical Society, that, “sovereign states might disappear and be replaced not by a world government but by a modern and secular equivalent of… the Middle Ages.”
Bull’s forecast of a new medievalism resonated with British elites.
As the Soviet Union collapsed, Rees-Mogg and others of his class began openly celebrating the end of the nation-state and the rise of a new feudalism.
Restoring the feudal order is, in fact, the true and hidden goal of globalism.
The British covertly supported the founding of the Muslim Brotherhood, appreciating that its theme was that the “Quran is our constitution” - i.e., no nation-states, no sovereign countries, no nationalism.
British Creation and Control of Islamic Terror: Background to China’s Defeat of Terror in Xinjiang
by Mike Billington
https://larouchepub.com/other/2020/4702-british_creation_control_of_is.html
https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/2020/eirv47n02-20200110/28-34_4702.pdf
The `Islamic Problem' Is a British Creation
https://larouchepub.com/lar/2008/3549islamic_prob_brit.html
The Muslim Brotherhood: The Many Faces of Their Majesty's Service
https://larouchepub.com/other/2013/4031mb_hms.html
The Muslim Brotherhood:
London’s Shock Troops for the New Dark Ages
https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1979/eirv06n18-19790508/eirv06n18-19790508_014-muslim_brotherhood_londons_shock.pdf
King Charles III converted to Islam
https://substack.com/@britishlioness/note/c-226633087?r=1kb28q&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
GLOBALISTS CREATE GLOBAL CRISES TO JUSTIFY GLOBAL GOVERNANCE
SCARCITY = DEPENDENCY = CONTROL
The Rise of Global Governance
by Henry Lamb
https://www.iatp.org/sites/default/files/Global_Governance_Why_How_When.htm
Henry Lamb on YouTube
UN Agenda 21/2030 & Global Governance
https://duckduckgo.com/?ia=web&origin=funnel_home_website&t=h_&q=Henry+Lamb+on+YouTube+
CLUB OF ROME:
The Club of Rome’s 1972 publication The Limits To Growth was a Malthusian blueprint on how the human population needed to be reduced in order to prevent an ecological collapse, which in itself was merely a disguised version of the abhorrent eugenicist ideas that were circulating in the early part of the 20th century and eventually died out with Hitler.
The widely discredited population bomb paranoia of the 70′s and 80′s was gradually replaced by the climate change fear-mongering that we see the organization pushing today, which again is merely another regurgitation of the eugenics-obsessed policies of the elite.
Prominent members of the Club of Rome include Al Gore and Maurice Strong, both of whom are intimately involved with privately-owned carbon trading groups like the Chicago Climate Exchange, whose multi-million dollar profits are solely reliant on protecting the credibility of the man-made global warming thesis from skeptics who have challenged its legitimacy in light of the Climategate scandal.
On page 75 of their 1990 publication entitled The First Global Revolution, the organization outlined how they would manufacture ecological scares in order to manipulate the public into accepting the imposition of a dictatorial world government run by them.
“In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill…
All these dangers are caused by human intervention… The real enemy, then, is humanity itself,”
states the report, which can be read in full at the end of this article.
The passage appears under a subheadline entitled, “The common enemy of humanity is Man.”
Of course, to unite the public against a common enemy, by using 'divide and conquer' to turn humanity against itself, villains need to be created in the public eye who can be blamed for slowing efforts to save the planet from the mythical threat of global warming, even as Arctic ice levels return to normal and much of the globe has just experienced its coldest winter in decades.
With global warmists despondent at the fact that reality hasn’t backed up their increasingly fanatical predictions, and with public opinion increasingly turning against them, they’re simply pushing ahead anyway with the agenda to impose authoritarian control measures to regulate and tax every aspect of our existence.
And if you don’t like it, then you’re obviously a well-funded propagandist for oil companies (which in fact are the most aggressive proponents of global warming), and merely questioning the likes of Al Gore is a 'crime against humanity' for which you will be summarily silenced and punished.
https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_clubrome11.htm
Restoring the feudal order is, in fact, the true and hidden goal of globalism.
How the British Invented Color Revolutions
As the British Empire shifted from a colonial to a neocolonial system, it had to develop quieter, more discreet methods for removing rebellious vassals
https://richardpoe.substack.com/p/how-the-british-invented-color-revolutions
How the British Invented George Soros
Puppetmaster or Puppet? Strongman or Frontman? Inside the Soros Psyop
https://richardpoe.substack.com/p/how-the-british-invented-george-soros
EXCERPTS:
Lord William Rees-Mogg set forth his globalist beliefs in a series of books co-written with U.S. investment writer James Dale Davidson.
In The Sovereign Individual (1997), the authors prophesied that “Western nations” would soon “crack apart in the manner of the former Soviet Union,” to be replaced by tiny jurisdictions “akin to city-states” which would “emerge from the rubble of nations.”15
The authors predicted that, “Some of these new entities, like the Knights Templar and other religious and military orders of the Middle Ages, may control considerable wealth and military power without controlling any fixed territory.”
As in the days of “feudalism,” wrote Rees-Mogg and Davidson, “low-income persons in Western countries” would survive by attaching themselves to “wealthy households as retainers.”16
In other words, the lower classes would return to serfdom.
This was all for the best, the authors wrote, as it would allow the “ablest people” — i.e. the “top five percent” — to live where they liked and do as they liked, free from loyalties or obligations to any particular nation or government.
“As the era of the ‘Sovereign Individual’ takes shape,” the authors concluded, “many of the ablest people will cease to think of themselves as party to a nation, as ‘British’ or ‘American’ or ‘Canadian.’ A new ‘transnational’ or ‘extranational’ understanding of the world and a new way of identifying one’s place in it await discovery in the new millennium.”
George Soros named his network of Open Society Foundations in honor of his London School of Economics (LSE) professor Karl Popper, whose theory of “open society” guides Soros’s activism to this day.
Popper’s 1945 masterwork, The Open Society and Its Enemies, is a philosophical defense of imperialism, specifically of British liberal imperialism, as espoused by LSE’s founders.
The Fabian socialists who founded LSE believed that British expansion was the greatest civilizing force in an otherwise barbarous world.
In his book, Popper expressly defended imperial conquest as a first step in wiping out tribal and national identities, to clear the way for a “Universal Empire of Man.”
By the 1990s, privileged families like Rees-Mogg’s had grown tired of hiding. They yearned for the good old days, when they could live openly in their castles and command their serfs.
Oxford political scientist Hedley Bull played to this crowd when he predicted, in his 1977 book The Anarchical Society, that, “sovereign states might disappear and be replaced not by a world government but by a modern and secular equivalent of… the Middle Ages.”
Bull’s forecast of a new medievalism resonated with British elites.
As the Soviet Union collapsed, Rees-Mogg and others of his class began openly celebrating the end of the nation-state and the rise of a new feudalism.
Restoring the feudal order is, in fact, the true and hidden goal of globalism.