Debt-for-nature swaps were first proposed in an opinion piece in the New York Times back in 1984, penned by Thomas Lovejoy, of the WWF. I… try to hold my hand up when I’m wrong. I completely misinterpreted his importance, because while focusing on his early career -
Obviously, your statement that no-one really understood the ultimate purpose at this stage in time is said tongue-in-cheek because you have painstakingly shown the setting up of the scheme.
This is so deep that it is not fixable. This is what is missing in the criticisms about the WHO treaty currently as if this 90 year old locomotive can be stopped in any other way than getting off of the tracks by just getting out of the WHO and its parent, the U.N. Therefore, these people serve as useful idiots or controlled opposition to obscure the prison walls closing in.
(Similarly, the virus-no virus theater serves to, likewise, remove the fact that there was no pandemic of a novel deadly virus and that it will not come again and, therefore, does not require an onerous government approach.)
i think its late in the game. but i dont think its too late. otherwise, there wouldn't be all these distractions going on.
watching the video with george hunt, around a third in he says that they told him they were working on the solvency issues. this, at a time where they were working on the 'ecosystem services' and so forth, which obviously would be used to monetise carbon credits.
but i also think that at this stage detail was missing, because the moneyed interests only started buying up forets and aquifers post-2000, which to me suggests that by then, the plan had solidified.
but that's also one of the weaker points. because the evosystem service valuation relies on the contingent valuation model, which really is pure trash. incidentally, that process launched in 1963 through Resources for the Future - which incidentally is same year where the first utterly flawed 'carbon consensus' arrived, which LBJ then used to launch several initiatives, culminating with the 1968 unesco biosphere conference.
... and unfortunately my head's in bit of a bad state today, because i could have sworn i read something about carbon trading yesterday, but i cant find it in the... many documents in went through.
Thanks for the Geo. Hunt videolink.
Obviously, your statement that no-one really understood the ultimate purpose at this stage in time is said tongue-in-cheek because you have painstakingly shown the setting up of the scheme.
This is so deep that it is not fixable. This is what is missing in the criticisms about the WHO treaty currently as if this 90 year old locomotive can be stopped in any other way than getting off of the tracks by just getting out of the WHO and its parent, the U.N. Therefore, these people serve as useful idiots or controlled opposition to obscure the prison walls closing in.
(Similarly, the virus-no virus theater serves to, likewise, remove the fact that there was no pandemic of a novel deadly virus and that it will not come again and, therefore, does not require an onerous government approach.)
Great job all around. Thanks.
i think its late in the game. but i dont think its too late. otherwise, there wouldn't be all these distractions going on.
watching the video with george hunt, around a third in he says that they told him they were working on the solvency issues. this, at a time where they were working on the 'ecosystem services' and so forth, which obviously would be used to monetise carbon credits.
but i also think that at this stage detail was missing, because the moneyed interests only started buying up forets and aquifers post-2000, which to me suggests that by then, the plan had solidified.
but that's also one of the weaker points. because the evosystem service valuation relies on the contingent valuation model, which really is pure trash. incidentally, that process launched in 1963 through Resources for the Future - which incidentally is same year where the first utterly flawed 'carbon consensus' arrived, which LBJ then used to launch several initiatives, culminating with the 1968 unesco biosphere conference.
... and unfortunately my head's in bit of a bad state today, because i could have sworn i read something about carbon trading yesterday, but i cant find it in the... many documents in went through.