Absolutely magnificent article Dr. Nass. Thank you so much and, for the umpteenth time, thank you for all the work you do in support of human health and human freedom. You are an exemplary human being.
Communist theory has never been successfully implemented in practice because of inherent and inevitable human greed. We are experiencing Technocracy and Algocracy (rule by Artificial Intelligence algorithms) for the benefit, profit and control of the Bank of International Settlements, governments, multinational corporations and the military-industrial-intelligence-pharma complex aka public-private partnerships. This is de facto DISASTER CAPITALISM USING MKULTRA SHOCK THERAPY FOR ASSET-STRIPPING OF WORKERS.
the two specific flavours of technocracy i incidentally (but briefly) outlined over here.
in reality, when you look through the claims of difference, they're pretty much identical. the primary difference relates to the guild socialism mechanism applied to the league of industrial democracy.
incidentally, the LID were founded as the intercollegiate socialist society, and included a number of members - including Walter Lippmann - of the Fabian Society and the Council on Foreign Relations.
Howard Scott's, by contrast, is the one more outwardly dressed up as top-down. but they both preach materialistic monism delivered by scientific clergy in the end. the difference is slight when it comes down to it - apart from the rhetoric.
but bogdanov's the one to read up on, because between Empiriomonism, Proletkult and Tektology... well, all contemporary roads lead to Bogdanov, including cultural engineering and all flavours of systems theory, ie adaptive management. i even posit that cybernetic empiriomonism is the equivalent of AI ethics.
So, Mark Carney, Trudeau's advisor during the Covid-19 military operation FAKE PANDEMIC which enabled the elimination of hundreds of thousands of Canadians (including me) from government pensions, payrolls and benefits thus, ERASING THOSE GOVERNMENT/CROWN CORPORATION LIABILITIES and maximizing stakeholder profits is a "scientific socialist"?
Mark Carney studied under Larry Summers which makes him a Friedmanian disaster capitalist who used MKULTRA SHOCK THERAPY for asset-stripping of workers. This was the biggest transfer (theft) of wealth in Canadian history.
Mark Carney was the Governor of the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England. He also worked for the Bank of International Settlements and Goldman Sachs. Mark Carney was part of the team of Friedmanian disaster capitalists responsible for the public asset-stripping and privatization of Russia after Parastroika.
What is being implemented is Global Governance via Technocracy and Algocracy (rule by Artificial Intelligence algorithms like Palantir's) FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE RICHEST CAPITALISTS IN THE WORLD. To insist these people are socialists is utterly absurd.
everything i do is with structure, organisation. everything logically can be traced back to a prior, and the buck stops with julius wolf. finance, governance, mediator approach, common good, gold clearance, environmentalism, systems theory - it all traces back to Julius Wolf. from there, you can work your way back to the Bank Charter Act of 1844 which kickstarted 'monetary monism' which is a central aspect of Marx/Engels's menifesto which followed 4 years later.
Albert Pike, incidentally, in 1871 outlined the level 33 freemason as one who balances inequilibrium. that is the central purpose behind freemasonry, and it aligns perfectly with the 'mediator approach', which may be more commonly known as guild socialism.
besides, in 1844 the sect which i have repeatedly outlined as the future One World Religion was founded - the Baha'i Faith. in the two threads, i had actual baha'i come and fundamentally misrepresent the structure, which aligns pretty much perfectly with the future global governance system.
here's the trace back to Julius Wolf. i outlined the technocracy movement above, which traces back to the ISS, which was essentially a communist front.
done in two - actually, let's drag in bogdanov as 3, technocracy inc as 4... let's add in the mediator approach as no five which you can call guild socialism if you like
Although author, Naomi Klein failed to acknowledge the Covid-19 military operation FAKE PANDEMIC as disaster capitalism and her greenwashing climate change narrative is a cover for the UN Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals....her book "The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism" is precisely what we are experiencing along with economic collapse of the debt-based capitalist financial system. This is predatory corporate raiding and asset-stripping of citizens/small businesses in order to usurp their market share using false flags, forever wars and manufactured emergencies like fake pandemics which suddenly, are everywhere.
Socialist systems have been under attack by disaster capitalists for decades. Your "scientific socialism" theory is akin to saying that the monster we face is a bankrupt and sick paraplegic while ignoring the Bank of International Settlements which is really in charge. Banks have never been socialists.
added detail on wolf, bernstein, woolf, zimmern, IIIC, League of Nations, UNESCO, the RIIA, the third british empire... look, i can do this all day long.
a) explain what the motivation would be here, wrt outlining the entire financial system, which clearly isn't in the interest of the stablishment
b) outline other 'AI Writers' which have, in depth, explained the role of each of its subsystems, how they're associated, and how it's twisted against the people
c) mesh the above with my systematic outlining of historical trajectory, including the entire trail of primary source documents
as i further explained in the exchange, technocratic ideals materialised essentially through the league of industrial democracy and howard scott's technocracy inc, where the former was essentially the fabian society's guild socialist model, and the latter comes back to energy monism. both aspects are part of the structure - but neither counts as an origin. LID, formerly the Intercollegiate Socialist Society, was essentially a communist front founded in the early 20th century with fabian backing (hence, the guild socialist aspects), whereas the energy accounting you presently see early stage, fused through CBDCs.
i have systematically provided primary documents at every stage of my discoveries, and it takes no more than a few clicks to establish. in fact, the very first link in this very post is to leo woolf's 1916 'international government', which details a trajectory - with full sourcing - which i haven't even seen anyone else discuss, never mind source. the origin of global governance, below, then places that in aspect of the system's full development.
in my most recent post, i again connect these lineages through the concept of monism, which in essence creates a mechanism of control. i can further elaborate on how this fits into spinoza's, in fact, i can tell you exactly what the fatal flaw is in Spinoza's Ethica is, because it's just another manipulative sleigh of hand at the end of the day.
but, again - what would be AI's motivation for laying this out?
A lot of words for saying: All (instigated/created) wars (and "crises") are bankers' wars.
Has been the case for centuries, if not longer. Glad to see some other people find out.
And the fun fact is; We don't need central banks, we can "print money" ourselves, without interest.
For the US, let's start by abolishing the privately owned Federal Reserve. Man, that would be life changing! Ever tried to FOIA balance sheets and the like of any central bank? Those who control your tax dollars and hand them over to the multi corps? You can't!
nah, i'm human alright, but i've outsourced the grammar and spelling operation to chatgpt quite simply because the articles took way too long to write without. in that process, it often frames stuff in a better way than i so i leave it. i know that somewhat strips personality, and of that im not crazy, but i quite simply don't have the time at this juncture.
unsure how ai, however, could have located this extremely-hard-to-find document, processed it, systemically discussing it, sourcing and publishing. many of
my review of jeff sachs' book over here took, essentially, 3 days from morning to midnight to write. i quite simply cannot spend that amount of time on this at the moment, so it's either publish less with more personality, or publish more with less. but in my thinking, what matters is the underlying subject - and that i havent seen ai discuss anywhere to this level of depth. in fact, i haven't found anyone who does, ai or human, anywhere.
the reality is that the second pass of the writing aspect itself commonly took as long as the first, because by then you have the actual story, as opposed to just some reflection of it in your brain. but once you have the full story, you commonly rewrite practically every paragraph so that it aligns, and preempts later topics by softly introducing underlying principles, etc, so that later topics appear more fluid in introduction. and all of that takes time - a lot of time.
but yeah, i readily accept that it results in better writing than outsourcing some of these aspects to AI. i still have to direct ai, and it's still a process which takes time, but it does reduce it significantly.
having said that, the more important aspects are the linkage to 'the structure', because as said - most of this isn't discussed anywhere. there are fragments here and there, many written in aesopian phrasing which you initially have to decipher, which then slowly connect to one another - often while o3 'fact checking' your connections will protest on some made-up (but 'AI Ethics' compliant) ground. that then costs yet more time.
Absolutely magnificent article Dr. Nass. Thank you so much and, for the umpteenth time, thank you for all the work you do in support of human health and human freedom. You are an exemplary human being.
haha well appreciated, though im not Meryl Nass - but thanks for the heads-up wrt where the sudden influx of activity came from
Sorry for the confusión. The praise on Dr. Nass still stands 😃
Communist theory has never been successfully implemented in practice because of inherent and inevitable human greed. We are experiencing Technocracy and Algocracy (rule by Artificial Intelligence algorithms) for the benefit, profit and control of the Bank of International Settlements, governments, multinational corporations and the military-industrial-intelligence-pharma complex aka public-private partnerships. This is de facto DISASTER CAPITALISM USING MKULTRA SHOCK THERAPY FOR ASSET-STRIPPING OF WORKERS.
https://canadianshareablenews.substack.com/p/far-left-far-right-totalitarianism?utm_medium=email&utm_content=post
no, it's scientific socialism of the Bogdanov'ian kind. and Bogdanov evolved Marx.
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/alexander-bogdanov?utm_source=publication-search
the two specific flavours of technocracy i incidentally (but briefly) outlined over here.
in reality, when you look through the claims of difference, they're pretty much identical. the primary difference relates to the guild socialism mechanism applied to the league of industrial democracy.
incidentally, the LID were founded as the intercollegiate socialist society, and included a number of members - including Walter Lippmann - of the Fabian Society and the Council on Foreign Relations.
Howard Scott's, by contrast, is the one more outwardly dressed up as top-down. but they both preach materialistic monism delivered by scientific clergy in the end. the difference is slight when it comes down to it - apart from the rhetoric.
but bogdanov's the one to read up on, because between Empiriomonism, Proletkult and Tektology... well, all contemporary roads lead to Bogdanov, including cultural engineering and all flavours of systems theory, ie adaptive management. i even posit that cybernetic empiriomonism is the equivalent of AI ethics.
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/closing-the-gap
So, Mark Carney, Trudeau's advisor during the Covid-19 military operation FAKE PANDEMIC which enabled the elimination of hundreds of thousands of Canadians (including me) from government pensions, payrolls and benefits thus, ERASING THOSE GOVERNMENT/CROWN CORPORATION LIABILITIES and maximizing stakeholder profits is a "scientific socialist"?
Mark Carney studied under Larry Summers which makes him a Friedmanian disaster capitalist who used MKULTRA SHOCK THERAPY for asset-stripping of workers. This was the biggest transfer (theft) of wealth in Canadian history.
Mark Carney was the Governor of the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England. He also worked for the Bank of International Settlements and Goldman Sachs. Mark Carney was part of the team of Friedmanian disaster capitalists responsible for the public asset-stripping and privatization of Russia after Parastroika.
What is being implemented is Global Governance via Technocracy and Algocracy (rule by Artificial Intelligence algorithms like Palantir's) FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE RICHEST CAPITALISTS IN THE WORLD. To insist these people are socialists is utterly absurd.
https://thenationaltelegraph.com/national/canadian-crown-corporations-coerced-employees-with-fake-vaccine-mandate/
https://www.activistpost.com/node-without-consent/
everything i do is with structure, organisation. everything logically can be traced back to a prior, and the buck stops with julius wolf. finance, governance, mediator approach, common good, gold clearance, environmentalism, systems theory - it all traces back to Julius Wolf. from there, you can work your way back to the Bank Charter Act of 1844 which kickstarted 'monetary monism' which is a central aspect of Marx/Engels's menifesto which followed 4 years later.
Albert Pike, incidentally, in 1871 outlined the level 33 freemason as one who balances inequilibrium. that is the central purpose behind freemasonry, and it aligns perfectly with the 'mediator approach', which may be more commonly known as guild socialism.
besides, in 1844 the sect which i have repeatedly outlined as the future One World Religion was founded - the Baha'i Faith. in the two threads, i had actual baha'i come and fundamentally misrepresent the structure, which aligns pretty much perfectly with the future global governance system.
here's the trace back to Julius Wolf. i outlined the technocracy movement above, which traces back to the ISS, which was essentially a communist front.
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-origin-of-global-governance?utm_source=publication-search
done in two - actually, let's drag in bogdanov as 3, technocracy inc as 4... let's add in the mediator approach as no five which you can call guild socialism if you like
https://chatgpt.com/share/68126dd9-d454-8005-87f3-5bfb84d87bb6
Although author, Naomi Klein failed to acknowledge the Covid-19 military operation FAKE PANDEMIC as disaster capitalism and her greenwashing climate change narrative is a cover for the UN Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals....her book "The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism" is precisely what we are experiencing along with economic collapse of the debt-based capitalist financial system. This is predatory corporate raiding and asset-stripping of citizens/small businesses in order to usurp their market share using false flags, forever wars and manufactured emergencies like fake pandemics which suddenly, are everywhere.
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1237300.The_Shock_Doctrine
https://unlimitedhangout.com/2021/11/investigative-reports/un-backed-banker-alliance-announces-green-plan-to-transform-the-global-financial-system/
https://unlimitedhangout.com/2024/11/investigative-reports/get-ready-for-the-republican-carbon-market/
Socialist systems have been under attack by disaster capitalists for decades. Your "scientific socialism" theory is akin to saying that the monster we face is a bankrupt and sick paraplegic while ignoring the Bank of International Settlements which is really in charge. Banks have never been socialists.
did you read the article?
it's includes mention of klein, which is a small aspect of the ground i cover.
5 steps to tie it all up. it's communism, whether you like it or not.
https://chatgpt.com/share/68126dd9-d454-8005-87f3-5bfb84d87bb6
added detail on wolf, bernstein, woolf, zimmern, IIIC, League of Nations, UNESCO, the RIIA, the third british empire... look, i can do this all day long.
https://chatgpt.com/share/68126dd9-d454-8005-87f3-5bfb84d87bb6
I think you may be dealing with an AI "writer".
You are holding your own and making sense. So "good on you".
Thanks for the dialog. It is interesting training to sharpen discernment.
interesting theory - but in case so, please -
a) explain what the motivation would be here, wrt outlining the entire financial system, which clearly isn't in the interest of the stablishment
b) outline other 'AI Writers' which have, in depth, explained the role of each of its subsystems, how they're associated, and how it's twisted against the people
c) mesh the above with my systematic outlining of historical trajectory, including the entire trail of primary source documents
as i further explained in the exchange, technocratic ideals materialised essentially through the league of industrial democracy and howard scott's technocracy inc, where the former was essentially the fabian society's guild socialist model, and the latter comes back to energy monism. both aspects are part of the structure - but neither counts as an origin. LID, formerly the Intercollegiate Socialist Society, was essentially a communist front founded in the early 20th century with fabian backing (hence, the guild socialist aspects), whereas the energy accounting you presently see early stage, fused through CBDCs.
i have systematically provided primary documents at every stage of my discoveries, and it takes no more than a few clicks to establish. in fact, the very first link in this very post is to leo woolf's 1916 'international government', which details a trajectory - with full sourcing - which i haven't even seen anyone else discuss, never mind source. the origin of global governance, below, then places that in aspect of the system's full development.
in my most recent post, i again connect these lineages through the concept of monism, which in essence creates a mechanism of control. i can further elaborate on how this fits into spinoza's, in fact, i can tell you exactly what the fatal flaw is in Spinoza's Ethica is, because it's just another manipulative sleigh of hand at the end of the day.
but, again - what would be AI's motivation for laying this out?
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-origin-of-global-governance?utm_source=publication-search
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-carbon-currency?utm_source=publication-search
A lot of words for saying: All (instigated/created) wars (and "crises") are bankers' wars.
Has been the case for centuries, if not longer. Glad to see some other people find out.
And the fun fact is; We don't need central banks, we can "print money" ourselves, without interest.
For the US, let's start by abolishing the privately owned Federal Reserve. Man, that would be life changing! Ever tried to FOIA balance sheets and the like of any central bank? Those who control your tax dollars and hand them over to the multi corps? You can't!
Well done and, sadly, all too accurate.
I believe that what you've described is what CJ Hopkins refers to as GloboCap.
There is something so cold and impersonal and I mean without personality in your writing, that I think I am writing on an AI's substack.
If you are a living breathing, eating and defecating human being, I ask you to allow me to know it.
Otherwise, congrats, and I leave you.
nah, i'm human alright, but i've outsourced the grammar and spelling operation to chatgpt quite simply because the articles took way too long to write without. in that process, it often frames stuff in a better way than i so i leave it. i know that somewhat strips personality, and of that im not crazy, but i quite simply don't have the time at this juncture.
unsure how ai, however, could have located this extremely-hard-to-find document, processed it, systemically discussing it, sourcing and publishing. many of
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/science-and-world-order?utm_source=publication-search
my review of jeff sachs' book over here took, essentially, 3 days from morning to midnight to write. i quite simply cannot spend that amount of time on this at the moment, so it's either publish less with more personality, or publish more with less. but in my thinking, what matters is the underlying subject - and that i havent seen ai discuss anywhere to this level of depth. in fact, i haven't found anyone who does, ai or human, anywhere.
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/ethics-in-action-for-sustainable-9be?utm_source=publication-search
the reality is that the second pass of the writing aspect itself commonly took as long as the first, because by then you have the actual story, as opposed to just some reflection of it in your brain. but once you have the full story, you commonly rewrite practically every paragraph so that it aligns, and preempts later topics by softly introducing underlying principles, etc, so that later topics appear more fluid in introduction. and all of that takes time - a lot of time.
but yeah, i readily accept that it results in better writing than outsourcing some of these aspects to AI. i still have to direct ai, and it's still a process which takes time, but it does reduce it significantly.
having said that, the more important aspects are the linkage to 'the structure', because as said - most of this isn't discussed anywhere. there are fragments here and there, many written in aesopian phrasing which you initially have to decipher, which then slowly connect to one another - often while o3 'fact checking' your connections will protest on some made-up (but 'AI Ethics' compliant) ground. that then costs yet more time.
anyhoo...