I am going to read again tomorrow, did a quick speed read through, but needs considered read, but essentiall agree with you. Appreciate your valuable time spent on the answers here and thought provocation.
I think the answer is to believe in God. Which entails that the map is NOT the territory.
They are constantly arguing that it is all one and the same, and I think it is a very important part of the deception. It will unravel as soon as more people start to see the more subtle aspects of reality again.
Which, I think, is, spoken in "systems theory" a HIGHLY non-linear and unpredictable process, but it has started ...
*Who, esc, or WHAT is at the helm and navigating this diabolical vessel that crushes ALL divergent thoughts, propositions and actions🤔 !?
*Through this machine's well-oiled insane actions, represent the rope around your neck that tightens until your submission is complete....or you suffocate and perish💀😈.
*Global top-down serfdom by controlling the Trinity,
Energy : control nations
Food : control the people
Money : control the WORLD🥺
will inevitably be imposed if spanners in the works aren't found and appropriately used.
*Some say that otherworldly forces are wielding their absolute control influence until the Human Herd is closed tight shut in the 'Cube' (film) from where it's almost impossible to escape🥴☹️.
*Identifying the invisible Enemy🤫 against whom we may be able to combat is, in my opinion, primordial.
I wasted 10 comments or so on yet another Marxist who point blank refused to reply to really simple yet fatal issues in his religion only yesterday. I’ve had enough of their ignorance for a while. It’s always the same. They willfully ignore catastrophic issues at the heart of their ideology.
Some people might think that this is still largely fiction. It is not.
I know someone who participated in a 'prestigious project' for one of the key institutions involved.
He withdrew, because he realized he was contributing to the development of a dystopian system.
On the other hand, I also know people who voluntarily (and sometimes proudly) promote the SDGs or the WEF on LinkedIn, at conferences, in interviews, etc.
Naturally, these are, almost without exception, highly educated people.
The system still has structural weaknesses. But whoever tries to hack at these, even if through fully legal and moral ways, will find out the hard way that "they"also have an underbelly which uses force and threats to run the invisible electric fence ...
A prominent example would be Julian Assange. Less prominent examples would be those who got imprisoned in the "war on crypto". (Look up what e.g. Aaron Day writes about that).
Even though esc is right that much of the enforcement is out in the open, one should not at all forget that they have a very dark side of very dark operations, too.
They need folks like Epstein and people who are compromised to run it, so it isn't all just deception out in the open and for everyone to see ...
Undoubtedly, dark/invisible operations exist, and within these domains there are different levels of (technical) sophistification. Most of the readers will be familiar with various 'black' intelligence and weapons development programs, so this is hardly a secret.
The notion of an invisible electric fence is interesting, because there might be another factor behind the ‘games that people play’.
In my country, there have been various whistleblowers in the past, as well as people who spoke out against certain phenomena serving the agenda.
Active solo resistance against institutions is almost always doomed to failure.
A recent example makes this perfectly clear.
This person made it into the national mainstream media, and his protest - primarily directed against the academic world - was even discussed in parliament.
The platform thus 'created' fueled his fighting spirit, but also revealed the pitfall.
Since this person was a colleague of people I know personally, I contacted him. He told me that ‘they (too) had stabbed him in the back’, leading me to suspect that his 'case' was already getting out of hand. I then warned him and advised him to ease off the gas, so as not to be completely absorbed by the dynamics and be left ruined.
In vain, as proved to be the case in the following months.
Co-option is the strategy of the system when a group has reached a certain level of resistance to the establishment. Im pretty sure there is a handbook somewhere. Controlled opposition, co-opting talking points etc. That is why Reform in the UK has no chance. It pretends to be the 'alternative'. That is just the sales pitch..
Highly educated usually means highly indoctrinated. The system creates its own set of reality bias. Historians get trained to look through a framework already set up for them. Take the 2 world wars. Almost no historian asks the question why it was necessary for the brits to become involved. It's mainly: we had to step in to stop the Evil Man. And then everything follows from there. Churchill is seen as the Great Statesman, etc. Time for a re-think.
don't entertain comments that tell you that everything is hopeless. it definitely isn't. the system is yet to close.
besides, think of it logically. you giving up - whose interests does that serve?
my objective is not to tell you, explicitly, who the adversaries are. it's to explain how they created and operate their system.
knowledge of the former leads to a replacement of baddies. the system will still stand. knowledge of the latter is where true resistance can begin. only by understanding how the system works can you begin to formulate what should take its place.
ethics - standards - clearing - settlement - outcome. that's what you need to understand.
once you understand, really understand how it's been implemented through and through, at the level from the local to the global, then we can start discussing lasting solutions.
until then, reject digital id, reject CBDCs, question all the 'SDG ethics'. delay, delay, delay - that's the strategy they use against us when convenient, now it's time to turn the tables.
here's a primer on ethics (keter)-standards (da'at)-clearing (tipheret)-settlement (yesod)-outcome (malkuth). it should be fairly easy to understand.
also, don't blame nationalities or ethnicities. michael laitman tells you why in his own words.
> Chilling statement, a type of Stockholm Syndrome.
Exactly that, and if you try to tell people that in the nicest, most roundabout way they still get angry. Maybe because I am too stupid to "awaken", but I sense I share that observation with unfortunately quite a few...
Just when you think the novel '1984' was a bad scenario, ESC comes and pushes the ultra doom button further down.
Makes you think: with the name ESC...where the hell IS the escape? Non compliance and resistance looks futile. But, there will be some that will find a way to subvert the control grid putting spanners in the works. Will they be the New Resistance? Freedom Fighters? Malware? I'm sure that scenario has also been considered. If the control grid fails the state will revert to physical force. Question: will the people by then already be propagandised to comply w the authorities and fearful of chaos to actually help to enforce the 'order'? Covid19 indicates that will be the case next time. It was, after all THE testcase.
At the end of 'Maxwell'.... 'The wiring does not stop working because someone published the diagram. But the system was never designed to be seen whole — and it has no defence for when it is.' Did I miss the exit?
The issue w the 'exit' is that the mechanism by which the Program 2030 can be reversed depends on actual power, not on revelation or skepticism, whistleblowers etc. It is basically elite theory 101. And where exactly IS that elite or where will it come from? I don't see any way of reversing the trajectory until a high level of deprevation and conflict is reached. That is history's lesson. Any opposition will be absorbed or excluded. And i ask this question: which party has CBDCs and Digital IDs high on their agenda? Some may say they have but all they talk about is immigration and border control, as if those issues can simply handled on a national level. In fact, they often seem to quite like the Digital ID idea. It gives them the sense of control. But that looks like co-option to me.
Untrue. Everyone with power was solidly working on the pro-narrative side of Covid. People are increasingly calling out the global warming scam for what it is. Labour and the tories combined barely took a third of all voters when they historically would be expected to carry that, each. ‘MAGA’ influencers are hyper-busy telling their supporters how totally aligned with ‘MAGA’ it is to bomb Iran, when Trump won the 2016 election because he opposed the war in Iraq. Ireland is close to breaking point. Need I go on?
They are completely dependent on censorship at this stage, and it will break. It’s just a matter of time. This is why they increasingly push through authoritarian measures wrt large social media platforms and allowed speech.
I hope i am wrong. Id gladly be wrong. But ask yourself this: did any mass protest actually resulted in policy change? Did the mass protests against Blair before the Iraq war stop UKs involvement? Did the french 'yellow vest' protests result in any structural changes?
Did the dutch farmer protests lead to halting the CO2 or nitrogen emission targets? 'Ireland at 'breaking point'? That is just a slogan. Even Sinn Fein considers 'sovereignty' a dirty far-right word now.(!)
do you think the ill will has gone anywhere, or do you think it's ready to re-emerge again down the road?
why is popular support for labour and the tories collapsing?
you're fundamentally arguing as if this is a done deal. in that case - why the emphasis on censoring voices on the internet? why are they daily ramping up the war on free speech?
if you're right, then that wouldn't matter at all.
One example: The Christian "invisible sky daddy" is ridiculed, but the structure is adapted as much as possible to be something like "big daddy government".
Totally cozy if you want to believe in this false, huge, all-encompassing mainstream cult until you happen to touch the invisible electric fence. Or as others say: "Beast system".
One huge deception.
It is also this *emulation* that pushed me to the realization that God is real, though transcendent.
Good essay with all the puzzle pieces in place…The end game was laid out in the 17th century “Enlightenment” era. Intellectuals discussed and researched the perfectibility of a “fallen world” by modeling the God concept of religious belief to create a secular society. Prosperity replaced the promised afterlife. They anticipated using education to produce the future technological tools provided by the scientific method to control and create the necessary environment. The study of classical literature and language (Latin and Greek allowed reading original sources) was considered dead, inferior and useless to educate future scientists. Reason ruled, no more superstitious stuff. Nature will tell us what we need to know and do. Ever wonder why climate change became such a big deal and a sacred cow?
I think nostalgia for the past occurs after any social upheaval. The “social sciences” were launched during the Enlightenment. They’ve come a long way since as a way to control humans and our way of being. Witness the article herein.
The out-picturing of the mind set by judgement assigns agency to its world.
The mind sets up an experience of self-illusion by judging thoughts, and then judging itself for its thought.
"What if love were different than it is?"
Is the wish to have the experience of a special love.
"What if reality were different than it is?"
Is the wish to see an idea of reality as separate or external to a private judgement suffering personal limitation as if at the hand of another.
As long as we reject or deny the experience we have set up to learn from, we persist in an intent running dark or disowned —as at the hand of blind agents —for they do not know or indeed love who you are.
But nor do the thoughts we send forth as judgements seeking reinforcement for a self-grievance.
The mind that knows not what it does runs automata - as the wish for a private or personal autonomy, in place of the willingness to love.
Love became an object, asset, and means for a possessive control in a loveless world.
Or rather our recognition and participation in love's awareness is discarded for the experience of self-will.
The belief we thus become free is an en-trance to a blind slavery, but when we recognise and release the mind of judgement, truth comes rushing in, to rise as awareness of true desire and fulfilment.
Does it not help to look at our experience as something we set up to learn from?
For when we see that we do not want what it pictures, it is released from service.
The cost of control is isolation, conflict and loss—or sacrifice set in struggle, sickness and death - masking as freedom-from life framed in lack, fear, rejection, abandonment, treachery and betrayal.
Judgement splits and fragments the mind that then defends the split against healing —in fear of loss of face or control—mistaken for reality.
WHO defines Life or Reality
MUST suffer the measure they gave.
That in truth we can NOT judge is hidden by 'conflicting judgements'.
That run as a default or automatic perceptual response loop.
Is this what I set up as a learning experience by which to freely accept love freely given, by release the choice to frame love as a dictate?
There is no truth IN a world of lies, but there is a freedom in releasing such a search to let it serve the healing reintegration and rehabilitation of a split mind.
You are not IN the experience that judgement made.
Nor need You be at war with what you think as if to set external controls for getting rid of (or masking over) internal contradictions.
Wrong, again. The crises that have been extracting wealth from the lower classes and diminishing freedoms in the last 2 centuries didn't just occur spontaneously. The system manufactures crisis, and requires crisis to operate. It has been Crisis Capitalism from the start : depressions, recessions, inflation, crashes, world wars, all deliberately provoked. It is not even theory anymore but documented fact.
You've done a truly masterful job of explaining how the 'architecture' keeps everyone in line, not through overt coercion, but by (through standards) making non-compliance difficult-to-impossible.
What is still unclear (at least to me) is who the architecture serves? I can't imagine it is some kind of self-runnig operation that serves itself. Does the BIS operate as it does, for purely bureaucratic interests? Or does it serve the interests of others that control it?
Put another way, you've described how ideology/ethics sets the initial stage. But who defines that ideology/ethics? And to what end?
Do you believe that the overall architecture is exclusively controlled by the Rothschild family? Or perhaps by a broader collection of (dynastic) banking interests?
In the end it comes down to systems of power and control. This trumps ideology or ethics. You strengthen the system by co-opting those outside your circle, widening it, combining it, institutionalise it. You might not share their beliefs but the combined power has a strong forcefield that will suck in other players who feel their power will be enhanced by joining the bigger group. Then you device an ethic and/or a religion which gives justification to the system and brings ingroup bondage as well as enhanced outreach. The biggest players will be able to shift the levers of control. They can brand shift, start a new conglomerate, change tactics and strategy. They will become immune to changes in the system and jump when a deck of cards is in danger of collapse. They will be there to 'help' in times of crisis. They are, in short: shape shifters. Pointing them out does not change matters..
Which is why I have focused on what it is they do, so people can recognise it. Pointing out that Rothschild and Rockefeller are at the heart of this is one thing but what actually matters is deciphering how they influence from behind the curtain so they can’t do it without being spotted.
It’s about giving people the tools so they realise themselves. That’s how you create change that lasts. Simply saying ‘it’s those people over there’ won’t make a blind bit of difference because others will just jump in and take their place.
Chilling exposé of the beast system. But again, it has one major weakness : kill the internet and it's dead and gone. Start with the few key DNS servers, there aren't that many. And sure, without the internet, there will be major pains. But I think it's definitely worth it. We humans have lived thousands of years without it. We can do it again.
The only way out is through exposure. Make people understand the system they face. Get it right out in the open, there’s a reason they’ve carried out their plans in the middle of the night.
If people legitimately understood, those politicians would be forced to act in a heartbeat. Because what’s taken place is genuinely outrageous, and those corrupt bastards need to be aware that they’re not getting away with their outright treason.
Their defence hinges on censorship of information. We, collectively, need a handful of charismatic people informing and we need to route around google facebook and twitter. Because those three are at the heart of the hyper-corrupt censorship machine.
And this i think is the flaw in your reasoning. There is no 'we'. A 'handful of charismatic people' won't be able to change anything if they don't actually have power. Elite theory 101. You need to be able to force things and steer the ship into a different direction. Right now it is basically a fight between rival castles of mafiosi as you yourself have pointed out. But who can go against the combined technological structure as it stands? Because anyone strong enough is already part of the structure. We DO live in a globalised world. In the end, if disruption is at a high level, chaos will bring forth compliance mechanisms and in the end technical and physical controls by the state.
so far, what i've learned from your comments is that
a) market prices are unimportant, which is absolutely not true
b) we need a 'counter-elite' - which is exactly the sort which will be corrupted in an instant; the system is almost explicitly set up to neutralise these. ironically, you then point out how hopeless it is for reform, which IS meant as the counter
c) you're focused on short-scale timelines, when these battles for the minds take longer - but we saw with covid that attitude changed very rapidly once the 'omicron' scarecrow failed to instill fear
d) the hopelessness of the entire situation
people are already well aware that something is majorly wrong. election results alone attest to that. but they don't yet know what the issue is.
the politicians are coming to realise they sit on a tinderbox, and only outright censorship is throttling what will eventually happen. which is why they're trying, desperately, to race to the finish point, throwing every distraction in your face in the media.
It's a start and a rather practical one. The word "internet" is rather interesting. Many think of it as inter-network, but it is inter-net, i.e a net in which we are caught like fishes. Rip the thing and you can escape somewhat. It will be chaotic for a while but better that than the alternative.
Thank you for aggregating and articulating all this information. No wonder you're exhausted.
Masterful work.
I am going to read again tomorrow, did a quick speed read through, but needs considered read, but essentiall agree with you. Appreciate your valuable time spent on the answers here and thought provocation.
Action is a MUST!
A WORLD THAT IS SO HOLLOW.
MVP. escape key guy is most valuable producer!!!
So many boomers of my age just can’t understand what’s the game; where all the nonsense is coming from.
Well, here ‘tis.
I see the cage but don’t know how to escape. One way ticket to the moon?
gold and silver ? Bitcoins ? You know the architecture, you must know the escape path
I think the answer is to believe in God. Which entails that the map is NOT the territory.
They are constantly arguing that it is all one and the same, and I think it is a very important part of the deception. It will unravel as soon as more people start to see the more subtle aspects of reality again.
Which, I think, is, spoken in "systems theory" a HIGHLY non-linear and unpredictable process, but it has started ...
Tell you what, I’ll spare you from having to read it from now on.
I fucking hate Marxist morons anyway.
Blocked
*Who, esc, or WHAT is at the helm and navigating this diabolical vessel that crushes ALL divergent thoughts, propositions and actions🤔 !?
*Through this machine's well-oiled insane actions, represent the rope around your neck that tightens until your submission is complete....or you suffocate and perish💀😈.
*Global top-down serfdom by controlling the Trinity,
Energy : control nations
Food : control the people
Money : control the WORLD🥺
will inevitably be imposed if spanners in the works aren't found and appropriately used.
*Some say that otherworldly forces are wielding their absolute control influence until the Human Herd is closed tight shut in the 'Cube' (film) from where it's almost impossible to escape🥴☹️.
*Identifying the invisible Enemy🤫 against whom we may be able to combat is, in my opinion, primordial.
Bonne continuation,
CJY🇫🇷
> or you suffocate
They have a thing for suffocation. See:
COVID...
CO2 tax... (which is essentially an O2 tax, so a tax on breathing without calling it that!)
Id rather talk to a proper educated marxist than an ignorant boomer 'normie'.
I wasted 10 comments or so on yet another Marxist who point blank refused to reply to really simple yet fatal issues in his religion only yesterday. I’ve had enough of their ignorance for a while. It’s always the same. They willfully ignore catastrophic issues at the heart of their ideology.
My comment was about preference, not whether marxism is flawed or not.
'A properLY indoctrinated Marxist'.
It's a cult, after all.
Some people might think that this is still largely fiction. It is not.
I know someone who participated in a 'prestigious project' for one of the key institutions involved.
He withdrew, because he realized he was contributing to the development of a dystopian system.
On the other hand, I also know people who voluntarily (and sometimes proudly) promote the SDGs or the WEF on LinkedIn, at conferences, in interviews, etc.
Naturally, these are, almost without exception, highly educated people.
It's the discernment of spirits, I guess.
The system still has structural weaknesses. But whoever tries to hack at these, even if through fully legal and moral ways, will find out the hard way that "they"also have an underbelly which uses force and threats to run the invisible electric fence ...
A prominent example would be Julian Assange. Less prominent examples would be those who got imprisoned in the "war on crypto". (Look up what e.g. Aaron Day writes about that).
Even though esc is right that much of the enforcement is out in the open, one should not at all forget that they have a very dark side of very dark operations, too.
They need folks like Epstein and people who are compromised to run it, so it isn't all just deception out in the open and for everyone to see ...
Undoubtedly, dark/invisible operations exist, and within these domains there are different levels of (technical) sophistification. Most of the readers will be familiar with various 'black' intelligence and weapons development programs, so this is hardly a secret.
The notion of an invisible electric fence is interesting, because there might be another factor behind the ‘games that people play’.
In my country, there have been various whistleblowers in the past, as well as people who spoke out against certain phenomena serving the agenda.
Active solo resistance against institutions is almost always doomed to failure.
A recent example makes this perfectly clear.
This person made it into the national mainstream media, and his protest - primarily directed against the academic world - was even discussed in parliament.
The platform thus 'created' fueled his fighting spirit, but also revealed the pitfall.
Since this person was a colleague of people I know personally, I contacted him. He told me that ‘they (too) had stabbed him in the back’, leading me to suspect that his 'case' was already getting out of hand. I then warned him and advised him to ease off the gas, so as not to be completely absorbed by the dynamics and be left ruined.
In vain, as proved to be the case in the following months.
Co-option is the strategy of the system when a group has reached a certain level of resistance to the establishment. Im pretty sure there is a handbook somewhere. Controlled opposition, co-opting talking points etc. That is why Reform in the UK has no chance. It pretends to be the 'alternative'. That is just the sales pitch..
Highly educated usually means highly indoctrinated. The system creates its own set of reality bias. Historians get trained to look through a framework already set up for them. Take the 2 world wars. Almost no historian asks the question why it was necessary for the brits to become involved. It's mainly: we had to step in to stop the Evil Man. And then everything follows from there. Churchill is seen as the Great Statesman, etc. Time for a re-think.
don't entertain comments that tell you that everything is hopeless. it definitely isn't. the system is yet to close.
besides, think of it logically. you giving up - whose interests does that serve?
my objective is not to tell you, explicitly, who the adversaries are. it's to explain how they created and operate their system.
knowledge of the former leads to a replacement of baddies. the system will still stand. knowledge of the latter is where true resistance can begin. only by understanding how the system works can you begin to formulate what should take its place.
ethics - standards - clearing - settlement - outcome. that's what you need to understand.
once you understand, really understand how it's been implemented through and through, at the level from the local to the global, then we can start discussing lasting solutions.
until then, reject digital id, reject CBDCs, question all the 'SDG ethics'. delay, delay, delay - that's the strategy they use against us when convenient, now it's time to turn the tables.
here's a primer on ethics (keter)-standards (da'at)-clearing (tipheret)-settlement (yesod)-outcome (malkuth). it should be fairly easy to understand.
also, don't blame nationalities or ethnicities. michael laitman tells you why in his own words.
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/eleven-gates
"A population tired of pointless fighting welcomes the quiet efficiency of technical administration as relief."
Chilling statement, a type of Stockholm Syndrome.
We're definitely in a bit of a pickle, but a ratchet is bidirectional.
We can turn this around with team-work, small successes compound over time.
Thanks for sharing this research esc.
> Chilling statement, a type of Stockholm Syndrome.
Exactly that, and if you try to tell people that in the nicest, most roundabout way they still get angry. Maybe because I am too stupid to "awaken", but I sense I share that observation with unfortunately quite a few...
“The architecture takes the space religion once held”
It’s like the system is constructed as Plato’s Nobel lie
Just when you think the novel '1984' was a bad scenario, ESC comes and pushes the ultra doom button further down.
Makes you think: with the name ESC...where the hell IS the escape? Non compliance and resistance looks futile. But, there will be some that will find a way to subvert the control grid putting spanners in the works. Will they be the New Resistance? Freedom Fighters? Malware? I'm sure that scenario has also been considered. If the control grid fails the state will revert to physical force. Question: will the people by then already be propagandised to comply w the authorities and fearful of chaos to actually help to enforce the 'order'? Covid19 indicates that will be the case next time. It was, after all THE testcase.
I already outlined the exit in ‘Maxwell’
At the end of 'Maxwell'.... 'The wiring does not stop working because someone published the diagram. But the system was never designed to be seen whole — and it has no defence for when it is.' Did I miss the exit?
The issue w the 'exit' is that the mechanism by which the Program 2030 can be reversed depends on actual power, not on revelation or skepticism, whistleblowers etc. It is basically elite theory 101. And where exactly IS that elite or where will it come from? I don't see any way of reversing the trajectory until a high level of deprevation and conflict is reached. That is history's lesson. Any opposition will be absorbed or excluded. And i ask this question: which party has CBDCs and Digital IDs high on their agenda? Some may say they have but all they talk about is immigration and border control, as if those issues can simply handled on a national level. In fact, they often seem to quite like the Digital ID idea. It gives them the sense of control. But that looks like co-option to me.
Untrue. Everyone with power was solidly working on the pro-narrative side of Covid. People are increasingly calling out the global warming scam for what it is. Labour and the tories combined barely took a third of all voters when they historically would be expected to carry that, each. ‘MAGA’ influencers are hyper-busy telling their supporters how totally aligned with ‘MAGA’ it is to bomb Iran, when Trump won the 2016 election because he opposed the war in Iraq. Ireland is close to breaking point. Need I go on?
They are completely dependent on censorship at this stage, and it will break. It’s just a matter of time. This is why they increasingly push through authoritarian measures wrt large social media platforms and allowed speech.
I hope i am wrong. Id gladly be wrong. But ask yourself this: did any mass protest actually resulted in policy change? Did the mass protests against Blair before the Iraq war stop UKs involvement? Did the french 'yellow vest' protests result in any structural changes?
Did the dutch farmer protests lead to halting the CO2 or nitrogen emission targets? 'Ireland at 'breaking point'? That is just a slogan. Even Sinn Fein considers 'sovereignty' a dirty far-right word now.(!)
Do you see where i am going w this?
do you think the ill will has gone anywhere, or do you think it's ready to re-emerge again down the road?
why is popular support for labour and the tories collapsing?
you're fundamentally arguing as if this is a done deal. in that case - why the emphasis on censoring voices on the internet? why are they daily ramping up the war on free speech?
if you're right, then that wouldn't matter at all.
🗽FREE SPEECH UNDER FIRE 🇺🇸
Antisemitism Laws vs. Liberty for ALL
https://telegra.ph/CENSORSHIP-04-28-7
Yes. Thank you.
They are trying to become God by emulating God.
One example: The Christian "invisible sky daddy" is ridiculed, but the structure is adapted as much as possible to be something like "big daddy government".
Totally cozy if you want to believe in this false, huge, all-encompassing mainstream cult until you happen to touch the invisible electric fence. Or as others say: "Beast system".
One huge deception.
It is also this *emulation* that pushed me to the realization that God is real, though transcendent.
Good essay with all the puzzle pieces in place…The end game was laid out in the 17th century “Enlightenment” era. Intellectuals discussed and researched the perfectibility of a “fallen world” by modeling the God concept of religious belief to create a secular society. Prosperity replaced the promised afterlife. They anticipated using education to produce the future technological tools provided by the scientific method to control and create the necessary environment. The study of classical literature and language (Latin and Greek allowed reading original sources) was considered dead, inferior and useless to educate future scientists. Reason ruled, no more superstitious stuff. Nature will tell us what we need to know and do. Ever wonder why climate change became such a big deal and a sacred cow?
Maybe, but German 'romanticism' was a reaction to french rationality so there's that..
I think nostalgia for the past occurs after any social upheaval. The “social sciences” were launched during the Enlightenment. They’ve come a long way since as a way to control humans and our way of being. Witness the article herein.
Are B Corps a good or a bad thing?
bad. they lead to the 'social license to operate'
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/esg-and-the-social-license-to-operate?utm_source=publication-search
The out-picturing of the mind set by judgement assigns agency to its world.
The mind sets up an experience of self-illusion by judging thoughts, and then judging itself for its thought.
"What if love were different than it is?"
Is the wish to have the experience of a special love.
"What if reality were different than it is?"
Is the wish to see an idea of reality as separate or external to a private judgement suffering personal limitation as if at the hand of another.
As long as we reject or deny the experience we have set up to learn from, we persist in an intent running dark or disowned —as at the hand of blind agents —for they do not know or indeed love who you are.
But nor do the thoughts we send forth as judgements seeking reinforcement for a self-grievance.
The mind that knows not what it does runs automata - as the wish for a private or personal autonomy, in place of the willingness to love.
Love became an object, asset, and means for a possessive control in a loveless world.
Or rather our recognition and participation in love's awareness is discarded for the experience of self-will.
The belief we thus become free is an en-trance to a blind slavery, but when we recognise and release the mind of judgement, truth comes rushing in, to rise as awareness of true desire and fulfilment.
Does it not help to look at our experience as something we set up to learn from?
For when we see that we do not want what it pictures, it is released from service.
The cost of control is isolation, conflict and loss—or sacrifice set in struggle, sickness and death - masking as freedom-from life framed in lack, fear, rejection, abandonment, treachery and betrayal.
Judgement splits and fragments the mind that then defends the split against healing —in fear of loss of face or control—mistaken for reality.
WHO defines Life or Reality
MUST suffer the measure they gave.
That in truth we can NOT judge is hidden by 'conflicting judgements'.
That run as a default or automatic perceptual response loop.
Is this what I set up as a learning experience by which to freely accept love freely given, by release the choice to frame love as a dictate?
There is no truth IN a world of lies, but there is a freedom in releasing such a search to let it serve the healing reintegration and rehabilitation of a split mind.
You are not IN the experience that judgement made.
Nor need You be at war with what you think as if to set external controls for getting rid of (or masking over) internal contradictions.
Wrong, again. The crises that have been extracting wealth from the lower classes and diminishing freedoms in the last 2 centuries didn't just occur spontaneously. The system manufactures crisis, and requires crisis to operate. It has been Crisis Capitalism from the start : depressions, recessions, inflation, crashes, world wars, all deliberately provoked. It is not even theory anymore but documented fact.
escKey,
You've done a truly masterful job of explaining how the 'architecture' keeps everyone in line, not through overt coercion, but by (through standards) making non-compliance difficult-to-impossible.
What is still unclear (at least to me) is who the architecture serves? I can't imagine it is some kind of self-runnig operation that serves itself. Does the BIS operate as it does, for purely bureaucratic interests? Or does it serve the interests of others that control it?
Put another way, you've described how ideology/ethics sets the initial stage. But who defines that ideology/ethics? And to what end?
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-rothschild-nexus
Do you believe that the overall architecture is exclusively controlled by the Rothschild family? Or perhaps by a broader collection of (dynastic) banking interests?
In the end it comes down to systems of power and control. This trumps ideology or ethics. You strengthen the system by co-opting those outside your circle, widening it, combining it, institutionalise it. You might not share their beliefs but the combined power has a strong forcefield that will suck in other players who feel their power will be enhanced by joining the bigger group. Then you device an ethic and/or a religion which gives justification to the system and brings ingroup bondage as well as enhanced outreach. The biggest players will be able to shift the levers of control. They can brand shift, start a new conglomerate, change tactics and strategy. They will become immune to changes in the system and jump when a deck of cards is in danger of collapse. They will be there to 'help' in times of crisis. They are, in short: shape shifters. Pointing them out does not change matters..
Which is why I have focused on what it is they do, so people can recognise it. Pointing out that Rothschild and Rockefeller are at the heart of this is one thing but what actually matters is deciphering how they influence from behind the curtain so they can’t do it without being spotted.
It’s about giving people the tools so they realise themselves. That’s how you create change that lasts. Simply saying ‘it’s those people over there’ won’t make a blind bit of difference because others will just jump in and take their place.
Chilling exposé of the beast system. But again, it has one major weakness : kill the internet and it's dead and gone. Start with the few key DNS servers, there aren't that many. And sure, without the internet, there will be major pains. But I think it's definitely worth it. We humans have lived thousands of years without it. We can do it again.
The problem is rather the collective *belief* in the system and if one wants to strike at the root, one has to work on changing that.
Burning PCs or cutting fiber optic cables would rather look like a substitute action along the "but we must do something!1! lines" IMO ...
You’re not going to win that way
The only way out is through exposure. Make people understand the system they face. Get it right out in the open, there’s a reason they’ve carried out their plans in the middle of the night.
If people legitimately understood, those politicians would be forced to act in a heartbeat. Because what’s taken place is genuinely outrageous, and those corrupt bastards need to be aware that they’re not getting away with their outright treason.
Their defence hinges on censorship of information. We, collectively, need a handful of charismatic people informing and we need to route around google facebook and twitter. Because those three are at the heart of the hyper-corrupt censorship machine.
And this i think is the flaw in your reasoning. There is no 'we'. A 'handful of charismatic people' won't be able to change anything if they don't actually have power. Elite theory 101. You need to be able to force things and steer the ship into a different direction. Right now it is basically a fight between rival castles of mafiosi as you yourself have pointed out. But who can go against the combined technological structure as it stands? Because anyone strong enough is already part of the structure. We DO live in a globalised world. In the end, if disruption is at a high level, chaos will bring forth compliance mechanisms and in the end technical and physical controls by the state.
Complete bollocks. Do you think they would succeed in locking down the west again?
Is that because of a few members of the elite?
Due to the nature of your inferences i consider it a fruitless effort to further engage w you on these matters.
I will continue to follow you and will link the various excellent articles you have written. Thank you for your work..🙂
Ok, now you've made it personal. Not a good move..
I will contemplate whether it is worth my time to reply. Your response indicates a misunderstanding..
you do as you do
so far, what i've learned from your comments is that
a) market prices are unimportant, which is absolutely not true
b) we need a 'counter-elite' - which is exactly the sort which will be corrupted in an instant; the system is almost explicitly set up to neutralise these. ironically, you then point out how hopeless it is for reform, which IS meant as the counter
c) you're focused on short-scale timelines, when these battles for the minds take longer - but we saw with covid that attitude changed very rapidly once the 'omicron' scarecrow failed to instill fear
d) the hopelessness of the entire situation
people are already well aware that something is majorly wrong. election results alone attest to that. but they don't yet know what the issue is.
the politicians are coming to realise they sit on a tinderbox, and only outright censorship is throttling what will eventually happen. which is why they're trying, desperately, to race to the finish point, throwing every distraction in your face in the media.
It's a start and a rather practical one. The word "internet" is rather interesting. Many think of it as inter-network, but it is inter-net, i.e a net in which we are caught like fishes. Rip the thing and you can escape somewhat. It will be chaotic for a while but better that than the alternative.
Made me think of Mike Smith's opening line in the documentary OUT OF SHADOWS:
"WHY DO YOU BELIEVE WHAT YOU BELIEVE?"