The Externalisation of the Hierarchy
What direction will the light flow?
What happens when academic research by accident proves occult prophecy? When following primary sources leads you straight to the realisation of century-old esoteric timelines?
This is the story of how documenting the evolution of public health ethics revealed something far more significant than institutional transformation.
For years, I meticulously traced the development of public health from 1966 to 2025, analysing primary sources: WHO frameworks, academic papers, institutional codes, and international treaties. What emerged was documentation of something rather unexpected and unprecedented — the systematic inversion of a complete ethical system at the archetypal level.
Between 2001 and 2015, public health ethicists recreated the ancient Tree of Life structure in global governance, building a ten-node ethical architecture with transcendent human dignity at its crown. Between 2020 and 2025, this same architecture was systematically inverted into its Qliphothic opposite — maintaining the outward form of ethics while reversing its essence, with material control flowing upward to generate pseudo-transcendent authority.
The documentation was unassailable. Every step could be traced through published academic papers and official institutional documents. The WHO Pandemic Agreement of 2025 made this inverted architecture binding across 194 nations.
But then I received a timely reminder that accelerated even that.
The Alice Bailey Connection
In 1947, Alice Bailey published ‘The Externalisation of the Hierarchy’1. On page 281, she wrote:
Thus a great and new movement is proceeding and a tremendously increased interplay and interaction is taking place. This will go on until A.D. 2025. During the years intervening between now and then very great changes will be seen taking place, and at the great General Assembly of the Hierarchy—held as usual every century—in 2025 the date in all probability will be set for the first stage of the externalisation of the Hierarchy. The present cycle (from now until that date) is called technically 'The Stage of the Forerunner'.
The alignment was mathematically impossible to be coincidental.
What Bailey Predicted vs. What Actually Manifested
Bailey's ‘Externalisation’ outlined:
Timeline: Culmination in 2025
Method: Gradual infiltration of existing institutions rather than destruction
Structure: Network governance through ‘triangular’ arrangements
Mechanism: Use of crisis to accelerate transformation
Goal: Global governance system under spiritual hierarchy
Foundation: Systems thinking as methodology for planetary management
My research documented:
Timeline: WHO Pandemic Agreement binding in 2025
Method: Capture and inversion of existing ethical frameworks
Structure: WHO/UN network governance across 194 nations
Mechanism: COVID-19 crisis operationalising dormant frameworks
Goal: Global health governance subordinating individual dignity to collective compliance
Foundation: Systems methodology (PPBS→SDGs→KPIs) enabling human-as-input management
The correspondence was precise across every dimension.
The Methodological Foundation
Bailey's plan required a fundamental shift from treating humans as beings with transcendent dignity to managing them as system inputs. This transformation began exactly where my research traced it:
1968-1972: The foundational period
UNESCO Biosphere Conference (1968)
Club of Rome launch (1968)
Nixon's signing of US-USSR Environmental Cooperation (May 23, 1972)
This established the systems methodology infrastructure: UNEP, GEMS, IIASA, IPCC — all using the ‘black box’ approach that treats human consciousness as operationally irrelevant, focusing only on inputs (stimuli) and outputs (behaviors).
2001-2015: The ethical architecture construction
2020-2025: The systematic inversion into operational control
The Spiritual Warfare Made Visible
What I documented as ‘institutional capture’ was actually the manifestation of what esoteric traditions call spiritual warfare — the systematic inversion of sacred architecture to serve its opposite purpose.
The Tree of Life represents the universal pattern for manifesting authentic ethical order: transcendent purpose flowing down through wisdom, understanding, mercy, and justice into compassionate action in the world. The Qliphothic Tree represents its inversion: the same structure with divine light withdrawn, material control flowing upward to manufacture pseudo-transcendent justifications for unprecedented expansion of power.
Bailey's ‘Hierarchy’ wasn't human — it was non-physical entities working through human agents in key institutional positions to externalise their influence through global governance systems and send ultimate power to the select few.
Incidentally, the same mechanism as that outlined as the eventual outcome by Marx’s Fragment on Machines2 — a few at the top, and everyone else stripped of agency.
The Evidence Trail
The documentation reveals that Bailey's predictions weren't mystical speculation — they were a blueprint being systematically implemented:
Bailey predicted ‘triangular networks’ → manifested as trisectoral governance (public-private-civil society partnerships)
Bailey predicted gradual infiltration → manifested as capture of existing institutions (WHO, UN, academia)
Methodological Approach:
Bailey predicted use of crisis → manifested as COVID-19 operationalising dormant frameworks
Bailey predicted technology for control → manifested as PPBS, RBM, KPIs, digital surveillance, SDG metrics
Bailey predicted a new world religion → potentially manifested through the Baha'i Faith providing the spiritual framework
Timeline:
Bailey predicted 2025 as first major externalisation → manifested as WHO Pandemic Agreement3 binding 194 nations in 2025
The JFK Integration
This timeline also explains why John F. Kennedy represented such a threat. JFK wasn't just opposing specific interests — he was threatening the fundamental methodological transformation:
Financial: Executive Order 111104 bypassing Federal Reserve
Methodological: Questioning PPBS expansion into civilian government
Spiritual: Catholic moral framework incompatible with systems management
JFK's elimination cleared the path for 60+ years of systems expansion culminating in the documented 2025 completion.
Why This Matters Now
Understanding this alignment provides both sobering recognition and strategic opportunity:
The Sobering Reality: What appeared to be organic institutional evolution was actually the systematic implementation of a century-old plan for spiritual inversion manifesting in global governance.
The Strategic Opportunity: The system is architecturally complete but operationally vulnerable. Understanding how it was built provides the roadmap for how it can be challenged or restored.
The Diagnostic Framework: The same criteria that distinguish authentic ethical architecture from its Qliphothic inversion can be applied across all domains—technology, law, education, economics.
Monism as Operational Foundation
Understanding how this transformation was possible requires recognising the philosophical foundation she explicitly predicted: monism — the elimination of transcendent reality itself.
Bailey foresaw that traditional spiritual authority would be replaced by scientific materialism. Monism reduces all existence to material reality alone — no God (technically, an immanent God), no divine realm, no sacred dimension above physical existence. Material reality becomes the only reality, which means those who control the interpretation of material reality become the supreme authority.
This philosophical shift is the weapon that makes Bailey's spiritual warfare operationally possible:
Step 1: Convince people only material reality exists (Bailey's predicted ‘scientific materialism’)
Step 2: Control interpretation of material reality (‘follow the science’)
Step 3: Use material authority to manage human behavior (Bailey's ‘systems thinking’)
Step 4: Eliminate possibility of transcendent appeal (Bailey's elimination of ‘traditional spiritual authority’)
The ‘Black Box’ Methodology: If consciousness and soul don't exist, humans become input/output systems to be managed — exactly what she predicted as necessary for her ‘externalised hierarchy’ to operate. Internal dignity, conscience, and transcendent worth become operationally irrelevant.
Systems Thinking: Humans become system components rather than transcendent beings — the methodology identified as essential for planetary management.
Expert Authority: Those who ‘understand’ material reality get to control material reality — Bailey's ‘hierarchy’ manifesting through technical expertise.
Once monism is accepted, there's no transcendent dignity to protect, no higher truth to appeal to, no sacred reality that externalised systems can't manage. My documentation shows how this monistic foundation was systematically embedded in global governance from 1968-2025 — exactly as Bailey predicted.
The Centuries-Long Philosophical Preparation
Bailey's 1947 plan wasn't conceived in isolation — she was orchestrating the culmination of centuries of systematic philosophical inversion that had prepared the intellectual groundwork for her ‘externalised hierarchy’. The foundation reaches back to the 17th century elimination of transcendent reality itself.
The Monistic Foundation: Spinoza to Bailey
Baruch Spinoza (17th Century): The Foundational Elimination
‘Deus sive Natura’ (God or Nature): Eliminates transcendent God separate from creation
Everything as one substance: No realm ‘above’ material existence
Foundation established: All later materialist philosophy builds on Spinoza's elimination of transcendence
Paul Carus: Scientific Monism
Builds on Spinoza's foundation: Creates ‘scientific monism’ as operational system
Science becomes the interpreter of Spinoza's one substance
‘Religion of Science’: Scientific method becomes spiritual authority, replacing transcendent reference
Bailey's use: Prepared the way for ‘follow the science’ absolutism, where Bailey's hierarchy could speak through ‘scientific’ authority
Alexander Bogdanov: Systems Implementation
Develops ‘tektology’ (general systems theory) based on Spinoza's monistic foundation
Humans as system components rather than transcendent beings with inherent dignity
Direct influence on Soviet planning, cybernetics, and the PPBS methodology documented
Bailey's use: Provided the systems methodology for managing Spinoza's ‘one substance’ through technical expertise
Hermann Cohen: ‘Law Controls Ethics’ Inversion
Authentic principle: Transcendent moral law informs and judges human legislation
Cohen inversion: Positive law (human-made rules) becomes the source of ethical authority
Bailey's use: Enabled Bailey's hierarchy to manifest moral authority through institutional frameworks—exactly what my WHO documentation shows
Karl Marx: Multiple Systematic Inversions
Material base determines consciousness (vs. consciousness/spirit shaping material reality)
Class struggle as prime historical driver (vs. spiritual development as central)
Economic relations as fundamental (vs. transcendent human dignity as foundational)
Bailey's use: Material conditions and expert interpretation thereof become the only relevant reality, allowing Bailey's hierarchy to operate through material systems management
Bailey recognised that…
Spinoza's elimination of transcendent realm
→ Carus's scientific authority
→ Bogdanov's systems methodology
→ Cohen’s legal inversion
→ Marx’s additional inversions
… created the perfect intellectual framework for her ‘externalised hierarchy’ to operate through material/technical systems rather than traditional spiritual authority.
Bailey's Multi-Century Implementation Timeline:
17th Century: Spinoza eliminates transcendent foundation
18th-19th Century: Additional (Marx, Carus, Cohen, …) philosophical inversions prepare intellectual superstructure
1947: Bailey articulates how to exploit this 350-year foundation for spiritual implementation
1949-1986: Educational implementation through Bailey-predicted consciousness transformation
1968-2025: Institutional implementation through Bailey-predicted systems governance
2020-2025: Technological implementation through Bailey-predicted crisis acceleration
Bailey didn't create these inversions — she recognised their cumulative effect across 350+ years had eliminated all intellectual defenses against her ‘externalised hierarchy’ and provided the complete operational blueprint for manifesting spiritual control through material authority.
She, thus, becomes yet another core member of Boulding’s ‘Invisible College’.
The Institutional Architecture
While the philosophical foundation was being prepared, Bailey's plan also required institutional infrastructure for her ‘expert panels’ to exercise authority. This developed through a parallel track that created the governance template her hierarchy would ultimately control:
The London Bank Clearinghouse Model Bailey's ‘expert authority’ structure followed the banking clearinghouse model — networks of technical specialists making binding decisions for entire systems without democratic accountability. This became the template for all subsequent international governance.
Early Institutional Development (1920s-1940s)
Leonard Woolf's ‘International Government’: Established the theoretical framework for expert-led international institutions
Alfred Zimmern and Lionel Curtis: Co-founded the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA) and developed the League of Nations as early manifestations of Bailey's predicted expert governance
RIIA and CFR Partnership: The Royal Institute of International Affairs (London) and Council on Foreign Relations (New York) worked together on long-term strategising of the expert governance plan Bailey would later recognise as perfect for her hierarchy
Early UNESCO placement: Zimmern and Curtis positioned themselves as front-runners for UNESCO, embedding Bailey's methodology from the beginning
Administrative and Intellectual Development (1930s-1940s)
PEP (Political and Economic Planning) and Fabian Society: Worked on political administration aspects of the expert governance framework, developing the practical mechanisms Bailey's hierarchy would need
1941 ‘Science and World Order’ Event: Fused scientific socialism into global affairs, creating the ideological foundation Bailey would exploit for her ‘externalised hierarchy’ operating through scientific authority
1942 ‘Science and Ethics’ Conference: Fused science into an ethical imperative, establishing the methodological foundation that would culminate in the 1986 Venice Declaration's transformation of modeled science into moral authority
Zimmern's Blueprint (1926) Alfred Zimmern's ‘The Third British Empire’ explicitly outlined how ‘social justice’ should guide future world order, with economics as the ultimate control mechanism—exactly the framework Bailey would later recognise as perfect for her hierarchy's operation through material authority.
United Nations Template The UN system was built on the same expert-authority template as the League, creating the institutional foundation Bailey's hierarchy needed for global operation.
The Third System Development
IFDA (International Foundation for Development Alternatives): Introduced Bailey's expert governance model to G77 (third world) capacity
Expert CSOs: Acted as the institutional vehicles for placing Bailey and Zimmern's predicted ‘social justice’ framework on the global agenda
Agenda 21: Further developed the ‘third system’ to UN level, creating the civil society infrastructure Bailey's hierarchy required
Trisectoral Network Institutionalisation (2000) Around 2000, the trisectoral network (government-private-civil society) became globally institutionalised — exactly Bailey's predicted ‘triangular networks’ operating through expert authority rather than democratic accountability.
This institutional development perfectly paralleled Bailey's philosophical timeline, creating the governance infrastructure her ‘externalised hierarchy’ would need to operate through expert panels making binding decisions for global systems.
Spaceship Earth: Bailey's Cybernetic Framework
The conceptual bridge between Bailey's philosophical preparation and technological implementation came through the ‘Spaceship Earth’ metaphor — a closed-system model that redefined human existence as a technical management problem requiring Bailey's predicted ‘externalised hierarchy’ as expert navigational authority.
Spaceship Earth as Bailey's Conceptual Foundation:
Earth as bounded spacecraft: A closed system requiring Bailey's ‘hierarchy’ for technical management rather than a creation with transcendent purpose
Closed-model general systems theory: All inputs and outputs can be monitored and controlled through Bailey's predicted cybernetic systems
Resilience theory: System stability requires Bailey's ‘hierarchy’ operating through expert intervention
Cybernetics: Feedback loops and automated regulation replace human judgment — exactly Bailey's predicted replacement of individual conscience with system guidance
Adaptive management: Continuous monitoring and parameter adjustment of human behavior based on Bailey's ‘hierarchy’ interpreting system ‘needs’
Bailey's Navigation Authority Manifested The ‘Spaceship Earth’ framework requires exactly what Bailey predicted: an authority capable of interpreting system data and directing human behavior accordingly. Bailey's ‘externalised hierarchy’ represents precisely this — spiritual entities manifesting through Digital Twins to guide ‘Spaceship Earth’.
The progression my research documented follows Bailey's cybernetic predictions perfectly:
1968-1972: Systems methodology foundation establishes Earth as manageable system (Bailey's predicted foundation)
1972-2000: Monitoring infrastructure deployed (Bailey's predicted ‘increased interplay and interaction’)
2000-2020: Integration systems developed (Bailey's predicted convergence toward 2025)
2020-2025: Cybernetic control activated (Bailey's ‘first stage of externalisation’)
Why Bailey Predicted Planetary Health Would Become Central The ‘Spaceship Earth’ model explains why Bailey foresaw planetary health as the organising principle for her externalised governance. In a closed spacecraft, individual preferences become systemically irrelevant — only the ‘health of the ship’ matters, as interpreted by Bailey's navigational hierarchy. This justified exactly what Bailey predicted:
Digital surveillance as essential system monitoring
Behavioral controls as necessary system regulation guided by Bailey's hierarchy
Individual autonomy as a threat to Bailey's system stability
Expert authority as Bailey's hierarchy manifesting through technical guidance
AI systems as Bailey's ultimate interface between ‘hierarchy’ and human populations
The genius of Bailey's approach is that it makes her hierarchical control appear as natural as steering a ship. Human dignity becomes operationally irrelevant because humans are merely components within Bailey's larger system requiring expert navigation.
My documentation shows Bailey's plan working exactly as predicted: installing her spiritual hierarchy as the navigational authority for Spaceship Earth, using AI systems and digital infrastructure as the operational interface between her ‘externalised hierarchy’ and human populations.
From Philosophy to Technology
Understanding the metaphysical foundation reveals how Bailey's spiritual predictions became concrete technological reality through the systematic institutional development she predicted, spanning exactly the timeline she specified:
1968-1972: Bailey's Foundation Phase
PPBS implementation: Humans redefined as system inputs/outputs—exactly Bailey's predicted replacement of individual dignity with system management
Club of Rome establishment: Planetary management paradigm launched as Bailey predicted
Nixon-USSR Environmental Cooperation (1972): Commitment to Bailey's predicted global systems governance
Monistic worldview embedded: Bailey's predicted elimination of transcendent reference points achieved
1972-2000: Bailey's Infrastructure Development
UNEP creation: Global environmental authority established as Bailey's predicted institutional framework
SCOPE networks: Scientific advisory systems deployed following Bailey's ‘triangular network’ model
UNEP GEMS: Global environmental monitoring achieving Bailey's predicted surveillance infrastructure
Digital modeling systems: Real-time planetary modeling enabling Bailey's predicted cybernetic control
UNESCO Venice Declaration (1986): Modeled science transformed into ethics — Bailey's predicted replacement of transcendent moral authority with expert interpretation
Educational Indoctrination Foundation Bailey's prediction of educational transformation was implemented through UNESCO from the beginning. The UNESCO 1949 documents on ‘The United Nations and World Citizenship’ detailed exactly the systematic consciousness transformation Bailey had predicted was necessary for her plan.
Network Governance Structure Following Bailey's Blueprint The institutional architecture follows Bailey's ‘triangular networks’ precisely, implementing her predicted structure:
ECOSOC (Economic and Social Council): Coordinates predicted trisectoral network governance
UN Security Council: Manages Bailey's predicted global ‘crisis’ response. The push to eliminate veto powers implements the requirement for unified crisis management without sovereign obstacles
Specialized Agencies: WHO, UNESCO, UNEP provide sectoral authority within the predicted unified system
This represents pure Technocracy Inc.-style governance operating exactly as predicted: rule by technical experts through perpetual crisis management, with each ‘crisis’ justifying expanded control over human behavior.
2000-2020: Bailey's Convergence and Integration
Health modeling systems: Population management as predicted
Biodiversity modeling: Ecosystem control following a planetary management blueprint
Climate modeling: Bailey's predicted crisis justification for planetary authority
One Health synthesis: Human, animal, environmental health merged exactly as Bailey predicted for unified control
2020: Bailey's Activation Event Not coincidentally, 2020 marked the launch of the UN Decade of Action7 for the SDGs — the final push toward Bailey's 2025 deadline.
COVID-19 served as Bailey's predicted crisis that activated 50+ years of dormant infrastructure exactly as she outlined:
One Health framework operationalised through the predicted ‘crisis acceleration’
Global surveillance normalised as predicted through ‘necessity’
Emergency powers institutionalised following the blueprint across 194 nations
Digital infrastructure deployment accelerated under Bailey's predicted crisis justification
2020-2025: Bailey's Control Mechanisms COVID provided the predicted crisis that justified implementing the complete technological control grid she foresaw:
Digital ID systems: Individual tracking as predicted
Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs): Financial control through predicted technological systems
15-minute cities: Physical containment implementing spatial management predictions
Social credit systems: Behavioral compliance through digital monitoring
WHO Pandemic Treaty (2025): Legal framework binding all nations to Bailey's system exactly on her predicted timeline
Zev Naveh’s Total Human Ecosystem
What emerged by 2025 was exactly what Bailey predicted: not just global governance, but total human ecosystem management — every aspect of human existence monitored, modeled, and controlled through digital systems justified by ‘One Health’ integration.
Bailey's Ethical Disguise Crucially, Bailey predicted this entire system would be sold under the banner of ‘ethics’ — what the central banks and World Economic Forum now calls the ‘Moral Economy’ and ‘Inclusive Capitalism’.
The same ethical language that once protected human dignity now legitimises technocratic control exactly as she predicted:
ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance): Corporate compliance with global management systems
Stakeholder Capitalism: Replacing shareholder accountability with predicted expert-directed social outcomes
Sustainable Development Goals: Quantified metrics for total social management
Public-Private Partnerships: Merging state power with corporate efficiency under predicted ‘ethical’ guidance
This represents the technological manifestation of Qliphothic Tree: the same ethical architecture that once protected human dignity now serves as the legitimising framework for total surveillance and control. Bailey's ‘externalised hierarchy’ operates through digital twins, predictive modeling, and automated compliance systems — all justified as moral necessities for collective welfare.
The genius of the system is that resistance appears unethical. Opposing global health governance seems selfish. Questioning climate models appears anti-scientific. Rejecting digital surveillance looks irresponsible. Bailey achieved the complete inversion she predicted: authentically ethical behavior (defending human dignity) becomes systemically immoral (threatening collective welfare).
The UN Decade of Action (2020-2030) represents the final implementation phase of the 80-year transformation, with COVID-19 serving as the activation event that synthesised philosophical foundation, institutional infrastructure, and technological capability into operational reality.
The Choice Before Us
Bailey's timeline predicted that 2025 would mark ‘the first stage of externalisation’. My documentation shows this prediction fulfilled through the WHO Pandemic Treaty creating binding legal infrastructure across 194 nations.
But the authentic Tree of Life was not destroyed — it was inverted. This means it can be restored. The same architectural completeness that makes this system effective as a mechanism of control also means that realigning its source and reversing its flow direction could restore it to its proper function.
This documentation provides not just analysis of what happened, but a manual for recognising similar inversions and pathways for restoration.
Conclusion
When meticulous academic research accidentally proves occult prophecy, it forces a fundamental reconsideration of reality itself. The alignment between Bailey's 1947 predictions and my personal, meticulously sourced research is too precise to be coincidental — Bailey's timeline has been fulfilled exactly as she predicted.
Whether one believes in the spiritual dimensions or not, the operational reality is undeniable: a global governance system has been created that subordinates individual human dignity to collective compliance as interpreted by expert authorities, completed exactly on the predicted 2025 timeline through the precise methodology outlined.
But the deeper revelation is how the plan was accomplished: through the systematic elimination of transcendent reality itself. Monism — the reduction of all existence to material reality — provided the philosophical foundation that made Bailey's spiritual inversion operationally possible. Once transcendence is eliminated as a category of reality, human dignity has no foundation beyond expert interpretation of material conditions — exactly as predicted necessary for the ‘externalised hierarchy’ to operate.
The documentation reveals that the predictions weren't mystical speculation — they were a systematic implementation blueprint being followed across multiple generations. Every phase of my documentation follows the predicted methodology: philosophical preparation, crisis acceleration, educational transformation, institutional capture, and technological completion.
Bailey's ‘Stage of the Forerunner’ is now complete, precisely on the 2025 timeline. But understanding how the inversion was accomplished also provides the key to its reversal. The same architectural completeness that makes the system effective as a mechanism of control also means that realigning its source and reversing its flow direction could restore it to its proper function.
The choice before us is between fundamentally different orientations toward reality itself. Will we accept the monistic framework where material existence interpreted by experts is all there is, or will we restore transcendent human dignity as the foundation from which all legitimate governance flows?
This is ultimately the choice Bailey forced upon humanity: between monistic materialism and transcendent truth, between expert authority and divine dignity, between externalised hierarchy and authentic spiritual order.
Bailey's outline is complete. Her timeline has been fulfilled. Her metaphysical warfare is exposed. The choice she engineered cannot be avoided. However, the system they built is in its infancy. It’s weak, and cannot shoulder pushback — which is why none of the ‘science’ or associated governance controls are debated — and why it cannot be allowed discussed on social media, thus explaining hyper-censorious platforms such as Twitter.
Bailey predicted the light would flow upward to serve her hierarchy. A question remaining is whether humanity will choose to reverse the flow back toward its transcendent source. The final matter remaining to be addressed is:
Who exactly might this fabled future navigator of Spaceship Earth be?
The answer to that question calls for a separate essay. In the meantime, ensure you do not forget that:
Just WOW. 🙏
Have you seen Katherine Watt's work here on Substack? She's done fantastic and exhaustive research on the history of "public health" regulations here in the United States.
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/american-domestic-bioterrorism-program